Hi,
I came across this bug with Libreoffice
I solved it by updating the following packages:
libxext6 to 2:1.3.0-3
libxmu6 to 2:1.1.0-2
libxmuu1 to 2:1.1.0-2
(These versions are in wheezy/testing ).
--
Daniel Reurich.
Centurion Computer Technology (2005) Ltd
Mobile 021 797 722
--
To UNSU
Hi,
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 12:34:20AM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> > diff --git i/libreoffice-core.postinst.in w/libreoffice-core.postinst.in
> > index e69de29b..cbf8ec59 100644
> > --- i/libreoffice-core.postinst.in
> > +++ w/libreoffice-core.postinst.in
> > @@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
> > +#!/bin/sh
> >
On Sun, Jul 10, 2011 at 05:04:45PM -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> diff --git i/libreoffice-common.postinst.in w/libreoffice-common.postinst.in
> index 56b9edce..03aea359 100644
> --- i/libreoffice-common.postinst.in
> +++ w/libreoffice-common.postinst.in
> @@ -36,10 +36,10 @@ if [ "$1" = "configur
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 633396 + pending
Bug #633396 [libreoffice-common] cannot upgrade libreoffice-common (cp: cannot
stat `/usr/lib/libreoffice/basis3.4/program/.services.rdb': No such file or
directory)
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
The following commit has been merged in the debian-experimental-3.4.0 branch:
commit 82b915c4b3e75faf2ec6234a7ec10a7d45c3059e
Author: Rene Engelhard
Date: Sun Jul 10 22:31:56 2011 +
make new -common break old -evolution/-filter-binfilter
diff --git a/changelog b/changelog
index de4309d
The following commit has been merged in the debian-experimental-3.4.0 branch:
commit f1a0e0256c34445f8bc6d9e0fe79af8b8e80f5b6
Author: Rene Engelhard
Date: Sun Jul 10 23:04:55 2011 +
call dpkg-trigger instead of calling the funtins directly (Jonathan Nieder)
diff --git a/changelog b/cha
The following commit has been merged in the debian-experimental-3.4.0 branch:
commit 3719071ece1927f7fa2188cf580db8c6a0734d70
Author: Rene Engelhard
Date: Sun Jul 10 21:16:00 2011 +0200
check for /@OOBASISDIR@/program/.services.rdb
diff --git a/changelog b/changelog
index 214ca9b..de4309d
The following commit has been merged in the debian-experimental-3.4.0 branch:
commit 1d6e969fb4af6c3c5f1bb5f4d7ea096a6e06d603
Author: Rene Engelhard
Date: Thu Jul 7 15:07:33 2011 +0200
remove obsolete changelog entry
diff --git a/changelog b/changelog
index 00af19f..214ca9b 100644
--- a/ch
Hi,
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 12:34:20AM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> Is there any reason against just calling the correct functions? I mean,
> what if the trigger once did more stuff we don't want it here at that
> place?
Umm, after reading your changelog entry it's clear.
> Hmm. Do we really n
On Sun, Jul 10, 2011 at 05:04:45PM -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> To lead the conversation in a more productive direction, the specific
> part that led me to think you find this to be a marginal use case was
> the "unreproducible".
Correct. For me. As I wrote this.
> How, after explicitly descr
thanks
Hi,
On Sun, Jul 10, 2011 at 11:37:09PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> Ah. Something extravagant I do not and never will care about.
OK, this extravagant stuff is so extravagant that I can't test it,
sorry
Doesn't handle file:/// here and neither when I move it to my public_html.
Why? Bec
> Rene Engelhard wrote:
>> Fuck off.
To lead the conversation in a more productive direction, the specific
part that led me to think you find this to be a marginal use case was
the "unreproducible". How, after explicitly describing an upgrade
path triggering the problem, could you believe it was
On Sun, Jul 10, 2011 at 04:52:48PM -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> Agh! Honestly I was trying to help (setting "owner" was to make clear
> that I am happy to take responsibility for the bug) and don't
> understand what I did wrong, so I would like some advice.
Then you shouldn't have claimed obvi
Rene Engelhard wrote:
> Fuck off.
Agh! Honestly I was trying to help (setting "owner" was to make clear
that I am happy to take responsibility for the bug) and don't
understand what I did wrong, so I would like some advice.
Clearly I don't understand how to contribute to Debian in a way that
is
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> owner 633396 !
Bug #633396 [libreoffice-common] cannot upgrade libreoffice-common (cp: cannot
stat `/usr/lib/libreoffice/basis3.4/program/.services.rdb': No such file or
directory)
Owner changed from Jonathan Nieder to Rene Engelhard
.
> thank
owner 633396 !
thanks
Hi,
On Sun, Jul 10, 2011 at 04:31:01PM -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> # maintainer doesn't seem to be interested, but the problem is well understood
> # and I'm happy to fix it
> owner 633396 !
If I was not interested I would have closed it alright and not
asked you stuff.
Hi,
On Sun, Jul 10, 2011 at 04:31:01PM -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> Rene Engelhard wrote:
> > On Sat, Jul 09, 2011 at 03:27:09PM -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
>
> >> Typical experimental amd64 system. From today's upgrade:
> >
> > How did you do the upgrade?
> >
> > And what is a "typical exp
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 633396 - unreproducible moreinfo
Bug #633396 [libreoffice-common] cannot upgrade libreoffice-common (cp: cannot
stat `/usr/lib/libreoffice/basis3.4/program/.services.rdb': No such file or
directory)
Removed tag(s) unreproducible and moreinf
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # maintainer doesn't seem to be interested, but the problem is well understood
> # and I'm happy to fix it
> owner 633396 !
Bug #633396 [libreoffice-common] cannot upgrade libreoffice-common (cp: cannot
stat `/usr/lib/libreoffice/basis3.4/program
# maintainer doesn't seem to be interested, but the problem is well understood
# and I'm happy to fix it
owner 633396 !
tags 63396 - unreproducible moreinfo
quit
Hi Rene,
Rene Engelhard wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 09, 2011 at 03:27:09PM -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
>> Typical experimental amd64 system
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tag 633396 + unreproducible
Bug #633396 [libreoffice-common] cannot upgrade libreoffice-common (cp: cannot
stat `/usr/lib/libreoffice/basis3.4/program/.services.rdb': No such file or
directory)
Added tag(s) unreproducible.
> tag 633396 + moreinf
tag 633396 + unreproducible
tag 633396 + moreinfo
thanks
On Sat, Jul 09, 2011 at 03:27:09PM -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> Typical experimental amd64 system. From today's upgrade:
How did you do the upgrade?
And what is a "typical experimental amd64 system"?
> | Setting up libreoffice-style-g
Package: libreoffice
Version: 1:3.4.1-1
Severity: important
After #616117 has been fixed, I cannot open exported PDFs with
Acrobat Reader at all anymore. If I try to view a generated PDF
(which displays fine with e.g. okular), Acrobat Reader tells me
about an Invalid Colorspace and then hangs itse
Package: libreoffice-impress
Version: 1:3.3.3-4+b1
Severity: normal
Hi,
I'm experimenting some srange behaviour with slide sorter with large documents
(200 - 300 slides) !
When I trying to select some silde in the middle of the document (more or less
!) and then delete that selection, the slide s
24 matches
Mail list logo
