RE> WTF are you citing libreoffice-common here but then file it against
openoffice.org-impress?
All I know is the latter has this dependency problem, as that is the
package I installed.
RE> No, because it not a MUST but it needed for SOME features. (And none in
impress)
Then please kindly rewo
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 629850 openoffice.org-core
Bug #629850 [openoffice.org-impress] "Please ensure that a JVM and the package
libreoffice-java-common"
Bug reassigned from package 'openoffice.org-impress' to 'openoffice.org-core'.
Bug No longer marked as fou
reassign 629850 openoffice.org-core
tag 629850 + wontfix
thanks
On Thu, Jun 09, 2011 at 04:40:53AM +0800, jida...@jidanni.org wrote:
> Package: openoffice.org-impress
> Version: 1:3.3.0-10
> Severity: wishlist
>
> Setting up libreoffice-common (1:3.3.2-4) ...
WTF are you citing libreoffice-commo
Package: openoffice.org-impress
Version: 1:3.3.0-10
Severity: wishlist
Setting up libreoffice-common (1:3.3.2-4) ...
javaldx: Could not find a Java Runtime Environment!
Please ensure that a JVM and the package libreoffice-java-common
is installed.
If it is already installed then try removing
~/.
Source: ooo-build-extensions
Version: 3.0.0.9+r14588-9
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110607 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> ┌
On 06/03/2011 10:24 AM, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> 2/ If your package uses the "activate" directive, is it important that
> your package be considered as not configured (and thus not satisfying
> dependencies) until the trigger has been processed?
i don't use any of the triggers but the one for upda
6 matches
Mail list logo
