found 605178 1:3.2.1-7
found 605178 1:2.4.1+dfsg-1+lenny8
severity 605178 minor
thanks
On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 10:45:58PM +, Sandro Tosi wrote:
> Version: 1:3.3.0~beta2-2
If the log says 2.4.1 and 3.2.1, too, why did you file it only against
1:3.3.0~beta2-2? :)
> Severity: important
Well, i
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> found 605178 1:3.2.1-7
Bug #605178 [python-uno] python-uno: Use of PYTHONPATH env var in an insecure
way
Bug #605181 [python-uno] python-uno: Use of PYTHONPATH env var in an insecure
way
Bug #605193 [python-uno] python-uno: Use of PYTHONPATH env
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> merge 605152 605155
Bug#605152: gquilt: Use of PYTHONPATH env var in an insecure way
Bug#605155: gquilt: Use of PYTHONPATH env var in an insecure way
Merged 605152 605155.
> merge 605153 605156
Bug#605153: pybliographer: Use of PYTHONPATH env var
Package: python-uno
Version: 1:3.3.0~beta2-2
Severity: important
Tags: security
User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: pythonpath
Jakub Wilk performed an analysis[1] for packages setting PYTHONPATH in
an insecure way. Those packages do something like:
PYTHONPATH=/spam/eggs:$PYTHONPATH
Package: python-uno
Version: 1:3.3.0~beta2-2
Severity: important
Tags: security
User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: pythonpath
Jakub Wilk performed an analysis[1] for packages setting PYTHONPATH in
an insecure way. Those packages do something like:
PYTHONPATH=/spam/eggs:$PYTHONPATH
Package: python-uno
Version: 1:3.3.0~beta2-2
Severity: important
Tags: security
User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: pythonpath
Jakub Wilk performed an analysis[1] for packages setting PYTHONPATH in
an insecure way. Those packages do something like:
PYTHONPATH=/spam/eggs:$PYTHONPATH
[ please wrap your lines. Your webmail is not a argument, there's
something like the enter key also on your keyboard ]
Hi,
On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 10:24:42PM +, Alexis PM wrote:
> Ok. I say, the problem (in Backports OOo 3.2) isn't to see the lines, but
> some lines cut in the presentation v
tag 605120
thanks
> De: Rene Engelhard
> Asunto: Re: Bug#605120: OpenOffice.org Impress 3.2 problems with
> Presentationview mode
> Para: alexispm_stellal...@yahoo.es, 605...@bugs.debian.org
> CC: cont...@bugs.debian.org
> Fecha: sábado, 27 de noviembre, 2010 22:42
> tag 605120 + confirmed
> fix
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tag 605120 + moreinfo
Bug #605120 [openoffice.org-impress] OpenOffice.org Impress 3.2 problems with
Presentationview mode
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #605120 to the same tags previously set
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please con
tag 605120 + moreinfo
thanks
> De: Rene Engelhard
> Asunto: Re: Bug#605120: OpenOffice.org Impress 3.2 problems with
> Presentationview mode
> Para: "Alexis PM" , 605...@bugs.debian.org
> CC: cont...@bugs.debian.org
> Fecha: sábado, 27 de noviembre, 2010 22:11
> tag 605120 + moreinfo
> thanks
>
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tag 605120 + confirmed
Bug #605120 [openoffice.org-impress] OpenOffice.org Impress 3.2 problems with
Presentationview mode
Added tag(s) confirmed.
> fixed 605120 libreoffice/1:3.3.0~beta3-2
Bug #605120 [openoffice.org-impress] OpenOffice.org Impr
tag 605120 + confirmed
fixed 605120 libreoffice/1:3.3.0~beta3-2
thanks
On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 03:41:55PM +, Alexis PM wrote:
> When you open a presentation made with OOo Impress 3.0 or 3.1, I can modify
> it without problems in normal view mode, but in view presentation mode (F5),
> the gra
tag 605120 + moreinfo
thanks
[ would you please wrap your lines at a sane amount? Like
at 72 chars max.? ]
Hi,
On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 09:03:19PM +, Alexis PM wrote:
> tag 605120 + moreinfo
Why? This just says "it needs more info", which you didn't provide.
> > This BTS is *not* for bugs o
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tag 605120 + moreinfo
Bug #605120 [openoffice.org-impress] OpenOffice.org Impress 3.2 problems with
Presentationview mode
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #605120 to the same tags previously set
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please con
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tag 605120 + moreinfo
Bug #605120 [openoffice.org-impress] OpenOffice.org Impress 3.2 problems with
Presentationview mode
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #605120 to the same tags previously set
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please con
tag 605120 + moreinfo
thanks
> De: Rene Engelhard
> Asunto: Re: Bug#605120: OpenOffice.org Impress 3.2 problems with
> Presentationview mode
> Para: alexispm_stellal...@yahoo.es, 605...@bugs.debian.org
> CC: cont...@bugs.debian.org
> Fecha: sábado, 27 de noviembre, 2010 16:53
> notfound 605120 1
On 11/27/2010 09:38 PM, Rene Engelhard wrote:
>>> Then just use a uptodate version? Long fixed.
indeed. by mistake, i was only checking for the debian revision -2 in
the version number, and overseen the beta2 instead of beta3. sorry for
the noise.
--
Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstra
On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 09:20:28PM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 09:17:22PM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> > Version: 1:3.3.0~beta3-1
> >
> > On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 09:12:06PM +0100, Daniel Baumann wrote:
> > > the libreoffice desktop files are all broken because during b
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> notfound 605144 1:3.3.0~beta3-2
Bug #605144 {Done: Rene Engelhard } [libreoffice] broken
desktop files
Bug No longer marked as found in versions libreoffice/1:3.3.0~beta3-2.
> found 605144 1:3.3.0~beta2-1
Bug #605144 {Done: Rene Engelhard } [libr
On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 09:17:22PM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> Version: 1:3.3.0~beta3-1
>
> On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 09:12:06PM +0100, Daniel Baumann wrote:
> > the libreoffice desktop files are all broken because during build
> > ${UNIXBASISROOTNAME} in Exec isn't expanded (wrong sed call becau
Your message dated Sat, 27 Nov 2010 21:17:22 +0100
with message-id <20101127201722.gr24...@rene-engelhard.de>
and subject line Re: Bug#605144: broken desktop files
has caused the Debian Bug report #605144,
regarding broken desktop files
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the prob
Package: libreoffice
Version: 1:3.3.0~beta3-2
Hi,
the libreoffice desktop files are all broken because during build
${UNIXBASISROOTNAME} in Exec isn't expanded (wrong sed call because of
$(VER) i think).
Regards,
Daniel
--
Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist
Em
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> notfound 605120 1:3.2.1-6~bpo50+1
Bug #605120 [openoffice.org-impress] OpenOffice.org Impress 3.2 problems with
Presentationview mode
There is no source info for the package 'openoffice.org-impress' at version
'1:3.2.1-6~bpo50+1' with architectu
notfound 605120 1:3.2.1-6~bpo50+1
found 605120 1:3.2.1-6
tag 605120 + moreinfo
thanks
On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 03:41:55PM +, Alexis PM wrote:
> Package: openoffice.org-impress
> Version: 1:3.2.1-6~bpo50+1
This BTS is *not* for bugs on bpo versions.
Does that also happen with squeeze/sids vers
Package: openoffice.org-impress
Version: 1:3.2.1-6~bpo50+1
When you open a presentation made with OOo Impress 3.0 or 3.1, I can modify it
without problems in normal view mode, but in view presentation mode (F5), the
graphics (lines, embedded images ,...) are partially cut.
If I export the presen
On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 11:50:45AM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> >Configurando openoffice.org-filter-binfilter (1:3.2.1-9) ...
> >file:///usr/lib/openoffice/basis3.2/program/libbf_migratefilterli.so
> >register component
> >'file:///usr/lib/openoffice/basis3.2/program/libbf_migrate
Hi,
first of all: habla ingles. And you don't need to send this twice.
Morover: no HTML mails, please.
On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 11:37:17PM +, DANIEL ROJAS wrote:
>/usr/lib/openoffice/program/unopkg.bin: error while loading shared
>libraries:
>/usr/lib/openoffice/program/../basis-li
27 matches
Mail list logo
