On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 08:14:25PM +0200, Bernard Jungen wrote:
> not in 3.2. I don't have more feedback. Expecting all users to have new
> versions installed regularly is just nuts.
I don't. If I would, OOo wouldn't be in debian stable at all - as over the
lifecycle
of stable you always would ha
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 06:15:46PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 04:42:37PM +0200, Bernard Jungen wrote:
> > Do you have a problem with the word "linked" in the report subject? Duh!
>
> No, I don't. Please stay on the topic and don't flame. *I* didn't.
What was your probl
Accepted:
libmythes-dev_3.2.0-9_armel.deb
to main/o/openoffice.org/libmythes-dev_3.2.0-9_armel.deb
mozilla-openoffice.org_3.2.0-9_armel.deb
to main/o/openoffice.org/mozilla-openoffice.org_3.2.0-9_armel.deb
openoffice.org-base-core_3.2.0-9_armel.deb
to main/o/openoffice.org/openoffice.org-b
openoffice.org_3.2.0-9_armel.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
openoffice.org_3.2.0-9_armel.deb
openoffice.org-core_3.2.0-9_armel.deb
openoffice.org-writer_3.2.0-9_armel.deb
openoffice.org-calc_3.2.0-9_armel.deb
openoffice.org-impress_3.2.0-9_armel.deb
ope
4 matches
Mail list logo