revno: 1701
committer: Rene Engelhard
branch nick: unstable
timestamp: Mon 2009-10-12 20:59:21 +0200
message:
better changelog entry
modified:
changelog
=== modified file 'changelog'
--- a/changelog 2009-10-12 18:15:31 +
+++ b/c
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 550758 normal
Bug #550758 [openoffice.org-kde] file extension never added
Severity set to 'normal' from 'important'
> severity 550759 normal
Bug #550759 [openoffice.org-kde] file dialogues always point to parent
directory of the one I'v
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # splitting the bugs
> clone 550467 -1 -2
Bug#550467: [openoffice.org] File dialogs are fucked up (not bar)
Bug 550467 cloned as bugs 550758-550759.
> retitle -1 file extension never added
Bug #550758 [openoffice.org-kde] [openoffice.org] File di
# splitting the bugs
clone 550467 -1 -2
retitle -1 file extension never added
tag -1 + moreinfo
tag -1 + unreproducible
retitle -2 file dialogues always point to parent directory of the one I've been
working on
tag -2 + moreinfo
tag -2 + unreproducible
# retitle original bug
retitle 550467 filter
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 544691 + pending
Bug #544691 [openoffice.org-kde] [openoffice.org-writer] Garbled open/save
windows
Bug #548771 [openoffice.org-kde] openoffice.org-kde: Checkbox description not
showing in the File > "Save as" dialog
Added tag(s) pending.
A
revno: 1700
committer: Rene Engelhard
branch nick: unstable
timestamp: Mon 2009-10-12 20:15:31 +0200
message:
KDE4 fpicker fixes
modified:
changelog
=== modified file 'changelog'
--- a/changelog 2009-10-10 20:56:37 +
+++ b/change
My version of python-uno is 1:3.1.1-4
I tested your suggestion and found out that the email-merge function
crashes 100% of the time too.
In a new text document, I did:
Tools > Mail merge wizard
At step 3 (insert block address), substep 1 (select address list), I
clicked on Create, and when
Quoting Rene Engelhard (r...@debian.org):
> No. This package is about "languages spoken in India". That Bengali
> is also spoken in Bangladesh is true, but not in the scope of this
> package which from the beginning only was intended to install all l10ns
> for packages spoken *in India*.
I don't
Hi,
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 07:20:45PM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
> Hmmm, I doubt that. That localization is also useful for bengali
> speakers in Bengladesh.
Who denies that?
> I think that "Indic-script languages" is the most appropriate term,
> here. This is what the users of these langu
Quoting Justin B Rye (j...@edlug.org.uk):
> > That was not the intention. It a metapackage for "languages spoken
> > in India". I don't care about what their script is or whether it's
> > actually a "Indic language" from language definition.
>
> Oh, and openoffice.org-l10n-bn is included for the
Rene Engelhard wrote:
>> Tamil and Telugu aren't "Indic languages", they're Dravidian
>> languages. Unfortunately we can't just substitute "Indian" either -
>> Bangla is Indic but not Indian.
>>
>> Of course this is really just another case of confusion between
>> writing systems and languages.
#
# bts-link upstream status pull for source package openoffice.org
# see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
#
user bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.org
# remote status report for #550453 (http://bugs.debian.org/550453)
# * https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_b
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> #
> # bts-link upstream status pull for source package openoffice.org
> # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
> #
> user bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Setting user to bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.d
13 matches
Mail list logo
