On Wed, Sep 02, 2009 at 03:32:17AM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 02, 2009 at 07:05:10AM +0800, Michael Deegan wrote:
> > I hope this report is against the right package (I chose the one that
> > provided unopkg, but of course it is a shell wrapper around a binary
> > living in a differ
Your message dated Wed, 2 Sep 2009 03:46:17 +0200
with message-id <20090902014617.ga10...@rene-engelhard.de>
has caused the report #470397,
regarding writer2latex: w2l fails with gij when no absolute path specified
to be marked as having been forwarded to the upstream software
author(s) writer2la
Hi,
On Wed, Sep 02, 2009 at 07:05:10AM +0800, Michael Deegan wrote:
> I hope this report is against the right package (I chose the one that
> provided unopkg, but of course it is a shell wrapper around a binary
> living in a different package).
>
> While upgrading from 3.0.1-9 to 3.1.0-5 I notice
Package: openoffice.org-common
Version: 1:3.1.0-5
Severity: normal
I hope this report is against the right package (I chose the one that
provided unopkg, but of course it is a shell wrapper around a binary
living in a different package).
While upgrading from 3.0.1-9 to 3.1.0-5 I noticed several e
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> close 542854 1.0~beta3-1
Bug#542854: writer2latex: suboptimal determination of tex-filename: w2l
test-v0.1.odt results in test-v0.tex
'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing.
Bug marked as fixed in version 1.0~beta
5 matches
Mail list logo
