./packages/openofficeorg/3.1.1/experimental r1644: released rc2-1

2009-08-21 Thread Rene Engelhard
revno: 1644 committer: Rene Engelhard branch nick: debian timestamp: Sat 2009-08-22 06:01:21 +0200 message: released rc2-1 modified: changelog === modified file 'changelog' --- a/changelog 2009-08-21 00:59:21 + +++ b/changelog 20

openoffice.org_3.1.1~rc2-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED

2009-08-21 Thread Archive Administrator
Accepted: broffice.org_3.1.1~rc2-1_all.deb to pool/main/o/openoffice.org/broffice.org_3.1.1~rc2-1_all.deb cli-uno-bridge_3.1.1~rc2-1_amd64.deb to pool/main/o/openoffice.org/cli-uno-bridge_3.1.1~rc2-1_amd64.deb libmythes-dev_3.1.1~rc2-1_amd64.deb to pool/main/o/openoffice.org/libmythes-dev_3.

Processing of openoffice.org_3.1.1~rc2-1_amd64.changes

2009-08-21 Thread Archive Administrator
openoffice.org_3.1.1~rc2-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: openoffice.org_3.1.1~rc2-1.dsc openoffice.org_3.1.1~rc2.orig.tar.gz openoffice.org_3.1.1~rc2-1.diff.gz openoffice.org_3.1.1~rc2-1_amd64.deb openoffice.org-core_3.1.1~rc2-1_amd64.deb openoff

Bug#542854: writer2latex: suboptimal determination of tex-filename: w2l test-v0.1.odt results in test-v0.tex

2009-08-21 Thread Jan Beyer
Package: writer2latex Version: 0.5.0.2-4 Severity: minor Hi, when running writer2latex on a .odt-file where the filename contains dots, the determination of the new tex-filename goes strange. Running $ w2l test-v0.1.odt results in test-v0.tex, whereas I would expect test-v0.1.tex. Actually, $ w

Processed: Re: Bug#539642: [openoffice.org-base] UPDATE db record fails: [unixODBC][SQLite]out of memory

2009-08-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > forwarded 539642 http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=104088 Bug #539642 [openoffice.org-base] [openoffice.org-base] UPDATE db record fails: [unixODBC][SQLite]out of memory Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'http://www.openoffice.org/i

Bug#539642: [openoffice.org-base] UPDATE db record fails: [unixODBC][SQLite]out of memory

2009-08-21 Thread Rene Engelhard
forwarded 539642 http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=104088 tag 539642 + patch tag 539642 + moreinfo thanks Hi, On Mon, Aug 03, 2009 at 01:13:11AM +, IMOTO Takashi wrote: > I'm using openoffice.org-base/unixodbc/sqlite3. When I try to modify > data in columns and push "save curr

Bug#527535: openoffice.org-calc: Rows to repeat in print range yields Invalid sheet reference

2009-08-21 Thread Mechtilde
I can reproduce it under the experimental version 3.1.1RC2 but not in the vanilla versions Mechtilde -- Dipl. Ing. Mechtilde Stehmann ## http://de.openoffice.org ## Ansprechpartnerin für die deutschsprachige QA ## Freie Office-Suite für Linux, Mac, Windows, Solaris ## Meine Seite http://www.mech

Bug#527535: openoffice.org-calc: Rows to repeat in print range yields Invalid sheet reference

2009-08-21 Thread acf
withckage: openoffice.org-calc Version: 1:3.1.0-5 Severity: normal Hi, I can confirm this bug, for openoffice.org-calc 1:3.1.0-4 and 1:3.1.0-5 and I am missing this feature. Reading https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502641 there seems to be no progress and the bug seems to be Debian s