Bug#541975: openoffice.org-math: some characters lead to “Write Error”

2009-08-16 Thread Ben Finney
Package: openoffice.org-math Version: 1:3.1.0-5 Severity: normal Steps to reproduce: * Create a new OpenOffice.org Math document. * Select “Save As...” and specify e.g. ‘foo.odf’ as an OpenDocument Formula file. The file is saved successfully to ‘foo.odf’. * Enter the following markup in t

./packages/openofficeorg/3.1.1/experimental r1638: use gcj-jdk/java-gcj-compat-dev on kfreebsd-*

2009-08-16 Thread Rene Engelhard
revno: 1638 committer: Rene Engelhard branch nick: experimental timestamp: Mon 2009-08-17 02:52:50 +0200 message: use gcj-jdk/java-gcj-compat-dev on kfreebsd-* modified: changelog rules === modified file 'changelog' --- a/changelog

./packages/openofficeorg/3.1.1/experimental r1637: when building with gcc 4.4 build with gcc-mingw32

2009-08-16 Thread Rene Engelhard
revno: 1637 committer: Rene Engelhard branch nick: experimental timestamp: Mon 2009-08-17 02:47:08 +0200 message: when building with gcc 4.4 build with gcc-mingw32 modified: changelog rules === modified file 'changelog' --- a/chang

Processed: retitle 541814 to openoffice.org: no 2^20 rows row support in calc

2009-08-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny3 > retitle 541814 openoffice.org: no 2^20 rows row support in calc Bug #541814 {Done: Rene Engelhard } [openoffice.org] openoffice.org: Go-OO for Windows allows 2^20 rows i

./packages/openofficeorg/3.1.1/experimental r1636: Standards-Version: 3.8.3

2009-08-16 Thread Rene Engelhard
revno: 1636 committer: Rene Engelhard branch nick: experimental timestamp: Mon 2009-08-17 01:11:42 +0200 message: Standards-Version: 3.8.3 removed: source.lintian-overrides modified: changelog control control.in === modified fi

Re: OpenOffice.org plans for the squeeze cycle

2009-08-16 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, On Sun, Aug 16, 2009 at 03:15:42PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote: > > * How many "big" transitions will the upcoming changes cause? When should > > those > > happen? Can we do something to make them easier? > > I am not aware of any, but you never know with Sun. (The last one was with > OOo

Bug#541814: marked as done (openoffice.org: Go-OO for Windows allows 2^20 rows in calc (approx 1 million), why not the Debian build?)

2009-08-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 16 Aug 2009 19:03:16 +0200 with message-id <20090816170316.gh23...@rene-engelhard.de> and subject line Re: Bug#541814: openoffice.org: Go-OO for Windows allows 2^20 rows in calc (approx 1 million), why not the Debian build? has caused the Debian Bug report #541814, regardin

Bug#534243: openoffice.org-core: Please switch to libneon27-gnutls

2009-08-16 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 06:13:14PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote: > Hi, Hi René, > On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 01:22:43PM +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > > Anyway, I'll fix this but I am not convinced that we should move from > > > SSl to Gnutls (except for curl which must be at gnutls for now because >

Bug#541814: openoffice.org: Go-OO for Windows allows 2^20 rows in calc (approx 1 million), why not the Debian build?

2009-08-16 Thread Tim Richardson
Package: openoffice.org Version: 1:3.1.0-5 Severity: wishlist The Go-OO website says that the Debian build of openoffice.org is based on the Go-OO code. On Windows, Go-OO allows "1 million" rows in Calc. (I haven't put this to the test much, I have to admit). Is there a reason why Debian doesn

Processed: your mail

2009-08-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > retitle 540442 [fixed for 3.2, cws dr72] openoffice.org: OpenOffice.org don't > open OOXML with password Bug #540442 [openoffice.org] openoffice.org: OpenOffice.org don't open OOXML with password Changed Bug title to '[fixed for 3.2, cws dr72] o

Re: OpenOffice.org plans for the squeeze cycle

2009-08-16 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, On Sun, Aug 16, 2009 at 02:41:06PM +0200, Marc Brockschmidt wrote: > * Which major upstream releases of OO.org are expected in the next two > years? Which of those are material for Debian stable, which might be a bit > flaky? The next two years from now? OOo 3.2.0 (planned End of Noiv. 2

OpenOffice.org plans for the squeeze cycle

2009-08-16 Thread Marc Brockschmidt
Heya, As announced on dda [RT1], we want to get an impression when releasing Squeeze is feasible. We have proposed a (quite ambitious) freeze in December 2009, and some developers have noted that their planned changes wouldn't be possible in this time frame. So, to find out when releasing would wo