Package: openoffice.org-math
Version: 1:3.1.0-5
Severity: normal
Steps to reproduce:
* Create a new OpenOffice.org Math document.
* Select “Save As...” and specify e.g. ‘foo.odf’ as an OpenDocument
Formula file.
The file is saved successfully to ‘foo.odf’.
* Enter the following markup in t
revno: 1638
committer: Rene Engelhard
branch nick: experimental
timestamp: Mon 2009-08-17 02:52:50 +0200
message:
use gcj-jdk/java-gcj-compat-dev on kfreebsd-*
modified:
changelog
rules
=== modified file 'changelog'
--- a/changelog
revno: 1637
committer: Rene Engelhard
branch nick: experimental
timestamp: Mon 2009-08-17 02:47:08 +0200
message:
when building with gcc 4.4 build with gcc-mingw32
modified:
changelog
rules
=== modified file 'changelog'
--- a/chang
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny3
> retitle 541814 openoffice.org: no 2^20 rows row support in calc
Bug #541814 {Done: Rene Engelhard } [openoffice.org]
openoffice.org: Go-OO for Windows allows 2^20 rows i
revno: 1636
committer: Rene Engelhard
branch nick: experimental
timestamp: Mon 2009-08-17 01:11:42 +0200
message:
Standards-Version: 3.8.3
removed:
source.lintian-overrides
modified:
changelog
control
control.in
=== modified fi
Hi,
On Sun, Aug 16, 2009 at 03:15:42PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> > * How many "big" transitions will the upcoming changes cause? When should
> > those
> > happen? Can we do something to make them easier?
>
> I am not aware of any, but you never know with Sun. (The last one was with
> OOo
Your message dated Sun, 16 Aug 2009 19:03:16 +0200
with message-id <20090816170316.gh23...@rene-engelhard.de>
and subject line Re: Bug#541814: openoffice.org: Go-OO for Windows allows 2^20
rows in calc (approx 1 million), why not the Debian build?
has caused the Debian Bug report #541814,
regardin
On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 06:13:14PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> Hi,
Hi René,
> On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 01:22:43PM +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > > Anyway, I'll fix this but I am not convinced that we should move from
> > > SSl to Gnutls (except for curl which must be at gnutls for now because
>
Package: openoffice.org
Version: 1:3.1.0-5
Severity: wishlist
The Go-OO website says that the Debian build of openoffice.org is based on the
Go-OO code.
On Windows, Go-OO allows "1 million" rows in Calc.
(I haven't put this to the test much, I have to admit). Is there a reason why
Debian doesn
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 540442 [fixed for 3.2, cws dr72] openoffice.org: OpenOffice.org don't
> open OOXML with password
Bug #540442 [openoffice.org] openoffice.org: OpenOffice.org don't open OOXML
with password
Changed Bug title to '[fixed for 3.2, cws dr72] o
Hi,
On Sun, Aug 16, 2009 at 02:41:06PM +0200, Marc Brockschmidt wrote:
> * Which major upstream releases of OO.org are expected in the next two
> years? Which of those are material for Debian stable, which might be a bit
> flaky?
The next two years from now?
OOo 3.2.0 (planned End of Noiv. 2
Heya,
As announced on dda [RT1], we want to get an impression when releasing
Squeeze is feasible. We have proposed a (quite ambitious) freeze in December
2009, and some developers have noted that their planned changes wouldn't be
possible in this time frame. So, to find out when releasing would wo
12 matches
Mail list logo