Bug#531750: openoffice.org: does not start

Roberto Lumbreras wrote: > it's just the usual boring i386 arch, Debian GNU/Linux system working > great for years with a normal Debian testing mixed with some bits from > unstable... don't ask me which ones because apt did the job, but I'd > see if you need it. And who says that is a sensible thi

Bug#531750: openoffice.org: does not start

sorry, I ran reportbug in my laptop, the mail bounced because I wasn't at work and then I did cut-and-paste but it seems I forgot some important bits from the original report. I think you'd be happier with that... it's just the usual boring i386 arch, Debian GNU/Linux system working great for year

Processed: retitle 531750 to openoffice.org: does not start (does not find pagein and libsofficeapp.so)

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny3 > retitle 531750 openoffice.org: does not start (does not find pagein and > libsofficeapp.so) Bug#531750: openoffice.org: does not start Changed Bug title to `openoffice.o

Processed: Re: Bug#531750: openoffice.org: does not start

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tag 531750 + moreinfo Bug#531750: openoffice.org: does not start There were no tags set. Tags added: moreinfo > tag 531750 + unreproducible Bug#531750: openoffice.org: does not start Tags were: moreinfo Tags added: unreproducible > thanks Stoppi

Bug#531750: openoffice.org: does not start

tag 531750 + moreinfo tag 531750 + unreproducible thanks Roberto Lumbreras wrote: > After upgrading the system, so ooffice has been upgraded from 2.4 to 3.0, How did you upgrade? What did you upgrade? In what distro? Which packages of OOo did you have installed *when the bug occured*? "Of course"

Bug#531750: openoffice.org: does not start

Package: openoffice.org Version: 1:3.0.1-9 Severity: normal After upgrading the system, so ooffice has been upgraded from 2.4 to 3.0, it does not even start: $ openoffice.org /usr/lib/openoffice/program/soffice: line 213: /usr/lib/openoffice/program/../basis-link/program/pagein: No such file or d

Processed: Bug#531118: please build-depend on unversioned boost devel package

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tag 531118 - wontfix Bug#531118: please build-depend on unversioned boost devel package Tags were: wontfix Tags removed: wontfix > tag 531118 + pending Bug#531118: please build-depend on unversioned boost devel package There were no tags set. Tag

Bug#531118: please build-depend on unversioned boost devel package

tag 531118 - wontfix tag 531118 + pending thanks Hi, Rene Engelhard wrote: > Well, actually I didn't try 1.38 yet :) I changed to 1.37 after 1.34/1.35 > were supposed to go away and stayed there OK, it *SEEMS* that it works. I changed the version for the next upload to default *thumbs crossed*.

./packages/openofficeorg/3.1/unstable r1577: switch to default boost (thumbs crossed, 1.38 seems to work, though)

revno: 1577 committer: Rene Engelhard branch nick: unstable timestamp: Wed 2009-06-03 16:37:24 +0200 message: switch to default boost (thumbs crossed, 1.38 seems to work, though) modified: changelog control rules === modified fil

Processed: retitle 472461 to [fixed for 3.1.1, cws sb112] Random segmentation faults in unoconv

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny3 > retitle 472461 [fixed for 3.1.1, cws sb112] Random segmentation faults in > unoconv Bug#472461: [fixed for 3.2, cws sb109] Random segmentation faults in unoconv Changed