Package: openoffice.org-common
Version: 1:3.0.1-2
Severity: normal
After today's upgrade, the Debian menu entries for Openoffice.org's
programs have lost their icons. This is due to a discrepancy of the
filenames referenced in /usr/share/menu/* and the actual filenames.
E.g. the menu entry for wr
revno: 1408
committer: Rene Engelhard
branch nick: debian
timestamp: Thu 2009-02-19 23:17:59 +0100
message:
update ooo-build; add missing changelog entry
modified:
changelog
=== modified file 'changelog'
--- a/changelog 2009-02-19 21
revno: 1407
committer: Rene Engelhard
branch nick: debian
timestamp: Thu 2009-02-19 23:12:01 +0100
message:
oops, missing comma
modified:
rules
=== modified file 'rules'
--- a/rules 2009-02-19 21:41:40 +
+++ b/rules 2009-
revno: 1406
committer: Rene Engelhard
branch nick: debian
timestamp: Thu 2009-02-19 22:41:40 +0100
message:
version the boost 1.37 build-dep for safety
modified:
control
rules
=== modified file 'control'
--- a/control 2009-02-19
revno: 1405
committer: Rene Engelhard
branch nick: debian
timestamp: Thu 2009-02-19 22:34:40 +0100
message:
typo; add libdbX.Y-dbg to DBG_DBG_SUGGESTS
modified:
rules
=== modified file 'rules'
--- a/rules 2009-02-19 21:30:51 +000
revno: 1404
committer: Rene Engelhard
branch nick: debian
timestamp: Thu 2009-02-19 22:30:51 +0100
message:
build with boost 1.37
modified:
changelog
control
rules
=== modified file 'changelog'
--- a/changelog 2009-02-18 21:12:55
is there any change / progress in this issue
is there an experimental package i / we can test ?
Hi,
Steve M. Robbins wrote:
> In a nutshell: libboost-dev is deprecated and will be removed in the
> coming weeks. In its place please build-depend on libboost1.38-dev
> (and siblings), which will be uploaded very shortly.
So 1.35 and 1.37 are OK? When are you planning to remove 1.35/1.37?
> As
Hi,
Julien Blanc wrote:
> In fact, i'm saying wrong version, because i would expect apt-get not to
> install anything in this case (not migrating to 3.0 since there is a
> dependancy breakage). This is what it does when installing, unfortunately not
There is no dependency breakage. The dependenci
Hi,
First, thanks for your answer,
> Hi,
>
> Julien Blanc wrote:
>> Looks also like there is a dependancy problem.
>
> Maybe, yes.
>
>> I'll try to remove and reinstall everything, and found the following :
>>
>> apt-get install openoffice.org-core -V
>> Les NOUVEAUX paquets suivants seront insta
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny3
> notfound 516090 3.0
Bug#516090: dependencies allow mixture of 2.4.1 arch-dep with 3.0.1 arch-indep
which fails to start
Bug#516084: when doing a dist-upgrade on sid, I g
Hi,
Julien Blanc wrote:
> Looks also like there is a dependancy problem.
Maybe, yes.
> I'll try to remove and reinstall everything, and found the following :
>
> apt-get install openoffice.org-core -V
> Les NOUVEAUX paquets suivants seront installés :
>openoffice.org-common (3.0.1-2)
>o
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny3
> found 516090 1:3.0.1-2
Bug#516090: dependencies allow mixture of 2.4.1 arch-dep with 3.0.1 arch-indep
which fails to start
Bug#516084: when doing a dist-upgrade on sid,
severity 516090 serious
retitle 516090 dependencies allow mixture of 2.4.1 arch-dep with 3.0.1
arch-indep which fails to start
reassign 516090 openoffice.org
reopen 516084
severity 516084 serious
forcemerge 516090 516084
found 516090thanks
Hi,
jblanc wrote:
> Package: openoffice.org-core
> Versi
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 516090 serious
Bug#516090: openoffice.org: Openoffice fails to launch
Severity set to `serious' from `grave'
> retitle 516090 dependencies allow mixture of 2.4.1 arch-dep with 3.0.1
> arch-indep which fails to start
Bug#516090: openoffi
Your message dated Thu, 19 Feb 2009 12:12:12 +0100
with message-id <20090219111212.ga23...@rene-engelhard.de>
and subject line Re: Bug#516084: when doing a dist-upgrade on sid, I get a
mixture of 2.4 and 3.0 openoffice.org. That doesn't work!
has caused the Debian Bug report #516084,
regarding wh
Looks also like there is a dependancy problem.
I'll try to remove and reinstall everything, and found the following :
apt-get install openoffice.org-core -V
Les NOUVEAUX paquets suivants seront installés :
openoffice.org-common (3.0.1-2)
openoffice.org-core (2.4.1-17+b1)
openoffice.org-s
Package: openoffice.org-core
Version: 1:2.4.1-17+b1
Severity: grave
File: openoffice.org
Justification: renders package unusable
Launching openoffice gives the following error :
/usr/lib/openoffice/program/soffice: 214:
/usr/lib/openoffice/program/../basis-link/program/pagein: not found
[Java fra
Package: openoffice.org
Version: 3.0
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
[r...@v200:~]38# apt-get update ; dpkg -l|fgrep openoffice
Hit http://debian.co.il unstable Release.gpg
Hit http://ftp.de.debian.org testing Release.gpg
Ign http://ftp.de.d
19 matches
Mail list logo