Your message dated Fri, 5 Dec 2008 18:47:50 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug close
has caused the Debian Bug report #386936,
regarding openoffice.org-core: Depends on libgstreamer0.10-0... why?
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35
> # GAH! 2
> retitle 434510 [fixed for 3.0.1, cws swffixes] flash v9 does not work
Bug#434510: [fixed for 3.0.1, cws swffixes] lash v9 does not work
Changed Bug title to `[fixed for 3.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35
> # GAH!
> retitle 434510 [fixed for 3.0.1, cws swffixes] lash v9 does not work
Bug#434510: [fixed for 3.0.1, cws swffixes] lash v9 does not work
Changed Bug title to `[fixed for 3.0.1
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35
# GAH! 2
retitle 434510 [fixed for 3.0.1, cws swffixes] flash v9 does not work
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35
# GAH!
retitle 434510 [fixed for 3.0.1, cws swffixes] lash v9 does not work
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35
> retitle 434510 [fixed for 3.0.1, cws swffixes] lash v9 does not work
Bug#434510: ~[fixed for 3.0.1, cws swffixes] flash v9 does not work
Changed Bug title to `[fixed for 3.0.1, cws s
revno: 1334
committer: Rene Engelhard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
branch nick: experimental
timestamp: Fri 2008-12-05 12:55:03 +0100
message:
close #434510
modified:
changelog
=== modified file 'changelog'
--- a/changelog 2008-12-04 17:03:32
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35
> forwarded 434510 http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=84584
Bug#434510: flashplugin-nonfree: please add support for openoffice.org
Noted your statement that Bug has been
On Fri, 2008-12-05 at 10:16 +0100, Noèl Köthe wrote:
> I prefer to put OOo 3.x into lenny because this is IMHO the major
> desktop application for alot of users.
I am not so keen on this idea.
We can fix OO.o 2.x for lenny users by backporting half of a relatively
small patch; Chris Halls and I w
Hi,
Tim Retout wrote:
> On Fri, 2008-12-05 at 09:40 +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> > But only when the text was formatted as hidden if I read the issue right?
>
> Not only then.
>
> Conforming documents (e.g. documents produced by Abiword are known to
> sometimes have this) might have text:displ
On Fri, 2008-12-05 at 09:40 +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> But only when the text was formatted as hidden if I read the issue right?
Not only then.
Conforming documents (e.g. documents produced by Abiword are known to
sometimes have this) might have text:display="true" explicitly set,
which is th
Hello together,
Am Freitag, den 05.12.2008, 09:40 +0100 schrieb Rene Engelhard:
> Rene Engelhard wrote:
> > > Now the problem is that data exchange from 3.0 to 2.x results in documents
> > > with blanked text so the user will not see the data of the text.
>
> But only when the text was formatted
[ oops, I noticed I did forget to Cc -release ]
Hi,
Rene Engelhard wrote:
> > Now the problem is that data exchange from 3.0 to 2.x results in documents
> > with blanked text so the user will not see the data of the text.
But only when the text was formatted as hidden if I read the issue right?
forwarded 507865 http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=96878
tag 507865 + upstream
thanks
Noel Köthe wrote:
> sadly we found a IMHO bigger problem for the 2.x users which will be in lenny.
>
> OOo 2.x implemented the ODF standard wrong which is fixed in OOo 3.0:
>
> http://www.openoff
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> forwarded 507865 http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=96878
Bug#507865: openoffice.org-writer: OOo 2.4.x openinig OOo 3 files doesn't show
text (2.x implements standard wrong)
Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to
http://www.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35
> found 507865 1:2.4.1-12
Bug#507865: openoffice.org-writer: OOo 2.4.x openinig OOo 3 files doesn't show
text (2.x implements standard wrong)
Bug marked as found in version 1:2.4.1-12
Package: openoffice.org-writer
Version: 1:2.4.1-13
Severity: grave
Justification: causes non-serious data loss
Hello,
sadly we found a IMHO bigger problem for the 2.x users which will be in lenny.
OOo 2.x implemented the ODF standard wrong which is fixed in OOo 3.0:
http://www.openoffice.org/is
17 matches
Mail list logo
