Bug#501957: libsb680lr is oo-core

2008-10-30 Thread Martin Guy
On 10/30/08, Rene Engelhard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Martin Guy wrote: > > Well, libsb680lr is in openoffice.org-core. > > And what do you want to say with that? > (Note #501957 *is* assigned against -core) Nothing, just thinkng aloud before reading up thoroughly. Can't find arm5vte in the

Re: broffice.org should have a versioned dependency on openoffice.org?

2008-10-30 Thread Nelson A. de Oliveira
Hi! On Thu, 30 Oct 2008 17:55:46 +0100 Rene Engelhard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Nelson A. de Oliveira wrote: > > Before this last update, when trying to run broffice (via Gnome's > > menu), he was getting the old splash screen of broffice 2.4. > > of course. the old broffice.org package of co

./packages/openofficeorg/3.0/experimental r1303: -4

2008-10-30 Thread Rene Engelhard
revno: 1303 committer: Rene Engelhard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> branch nick: debian timestamp: Thu 2008-10-30 18:48:57 +0100 message: -4 modified: changelog === modified file 'changelog' --- a/changelog 2008-10-30 10:51:59 + +++ b/chang

openoffice.org_3.0.0-4_source+all+amd64.changes ACCEPTED

2008-10-30 Thread Debian Installer
Accepted: broffice.org_3.0.0-4_all.deb to pool/main/o/openoffice.org/broffice.org_3.0.0-4_all.deb cli-uno-bridge_3.0.0-4_amd64.deb to pool/main/o/openoffice.org/cli-uno-bridge_3.0.0-4_amd64.deb libmythes-dev_3.0.0-4_amd64.deb to pool/main/o/openoffice.org/libmythes-dev_3.0.0-4_amd64.deb libu

Bug#501957: libsb680lr is oo-core

2008-10-30 Thread Martin Guy
On 10/30/08, Rene Engelhard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It is in the source. > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/OpenOffice.org/OOH680_m18/solenv$ grep -r armv5 * > inc/unxlngr.mk:CFLAGS+=-march=armv5te -fno-omit-frame-pointer [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/arm/openoffice.org-2.4.1$ grep -r armv5 * [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

Bug#501957: libsb680lr is oo-core

2008-10-30 Thread Rene Engelhard
Martin Guy wrote: > On 10/30/08, Rene Engelhard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > It is in the source. > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/OpenOffice.org/OOH680_m18/solenv$ grep -r armv5 * > > inc/unxlngr.mk:CFLAGS+=-march=armv5te -fno-omit-frame-pointer > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/arm/openoffice.org-2.4.1$ gr

Processing of openoffice.org_3.0.0-4_source+all+amd64.changes

2008-10-30 Thread Archive Administrator
openoffice.org_3.0.0-4_source+all+amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: openoffice.org-help-it_3.0.0-4_all.deb openoffice.org-style-industrial_3.0.0-4_all.deb openoffice.org-l10n-hu_3.0.0-4_all.deb openoffice.org-l10n-en-gb_3.0.0-4_all.deb openoffice.org-

Re: broffice.org should have a versioned dependency on openoffice.org?

2008-10-30 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, Nelson A. de Oliveira wrote: > > After a second read: not at all. Because that wouldn't help, if you > > add a versioned dep to the new broffice.org packages you still can > > have the old ones installed. What we *could* do and what would help > > would making openoffice.org-common conflict ag

Re: broffice.org should have a versioned dependency on openoffice.org?

2008-10-30 Thread Nelson A. de Oliveira
Hi Rene! On Thu, 30 Oct 2008 15:14:22 +0100 Rene Engelhard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Rene Engelhard wrote: > > > Shouldn't it have a versioned dependency on openoffice.org? > > > (while I > > > > Maybe, though I currently don't see why. > > After a second read: not at all. Because that would

Bug#501957: libsb680lr is oo-core

2008-10-30 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, Martin Guy wrote: > On 10/30/08, Rene Engelhard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Martin Guy wrote: > > > Well, libsb680lr is in openoffice.org-core. > > > > And what do you want to say with that? > > (Note #501957 *is* assigned against -core) > > Nothing, just thinkng aloud before reading up

openoffice.org-dictionaries 1:2.4.0~m240-3 MIGRATED to testing

2008-10-30 Thread Debian testing watch
FYI: The status of the openoffice.org-dictionaries source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: 1:2.4.0~m240-2 Current version: 1:2.4.0~m240-3 -- This email is automatically generated; the Debian Release Team <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> is responsible. See http://r

./packages/openofficeorg/3.0/experimental r1302: make -common conflict against older broffice.orgs

2008-10-30 Thread Rene Engelhard
revno: 1302 committer: Rene Engelhard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> branch nick: debian timestamp: Thu 2008-10-30 15:57:32 +0100 message: make -common conflict against older broffice.orgs modified: control control.in === modified file 'contro

Re: broffice.org should have a versioned dependency on openoffice.org?

2008-10-30 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, Rene Engelhard wrote: > > Shouldn't it have a versioned dependency on openoffice.org? (while I > > Maybe, though I currently don't see why. After a second read: not at all. Because that wouldn't help, if you add a versioned dep to the new broffice.org packages you still can have the old ones

./packages/openofficeorg/3.0/experimental r1301: brand dir...

2008-10-30 Thread Rene Engelhard
revno: 1301 committer: Rene Engelhard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> branch nick: debian timestamp: Thu 2008-10-30 15:33:37 +0100 message: brand dir... modified: broffice.org.preinst.in === modified file 'broffice.org.preinst.in' --- a/broffice.

Bug#501957: libsb680lr is oo-core

2008-10-30 Thread Rene Engelhard
Martin Guy wrote: > Well, libsb680lr is in openoffice.org-core. And what do you want to say with that? (Note #501957 *is* assigned against -core) Grüße/Regards, René -- .''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer : :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/ `. `' [

./packages/openofficeorg/3.0/experimental r1300: erm, here too of course

2008-10-30 Thread Rene Engelhard
revno: 1300 committer: Rene Engelhard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> branch nick: debian timestamp: Thu 2008-10-30 11:51:59 +0100 message: erm, here too of course modified: broffice.org.postrm.in broffice.org.preinst.in ---

Bug#501957: libsb680lr is oo-core

2008-10-30 Thread Martin Guy
Well, libsb680lr is in openoffice.org-core. M -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

openoffice.org_2.4.1-12~bpo40+1_amd64.changes REJECTED

2008-10-30 Thread Debian Installer
Rejected: Unknown distribution `etch-backports'. === If you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if the override file requires editing, reply to this email. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processing of openoffice.org_2.4.1-12~bpo40+1_amd64.changes

2008-10-30 Thread Archive Administrator
openoffice.org_2.4.1-12~bpo40+1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: openoffice.org_2.4.1-12~bpo40+1.dsc openoffice.org_2.4.1-12~bpo40+1.diff.gz openoffice.org_2.4.1-12~bpo40+1_amd64.deb openoffice.org-core_2.4.1-12~bpo40+1_amd64.deb openoffice.org-writer