FYI: The status of the libhnj source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 0.1.1-13
Current version: (not in testing)
Hint: Package not in unstable
The script that generates this mail tries to extract removal
reasons from comments in the britney hint files
This message is being sent to all packages that depend on icu and have
not uploaded a recent version that mentions the libicu-dev change in
their changelogs. If you haven't already done so and your package
build depends on libicu36-dev, please update the build dependency to
be on libicu-dev inste
revno: 977
committer: Rene Engelhard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
branch nick: debian
timestamp: Mon 2007-12-10 15:07:42 +0100
message:
update ooo-build; add ENABLE_REPORTDESIGN conditional, disable it for etch;
remove libsvg conditional; rm -f
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> unarchive 420803
Unarchived Bug 420803
> unarchive 411693
Unarchived Bug 411693
Unarchived Bug 407949
Unarchived Bug 418146
Unarchived Bug 422084
> found 420803 2.0.2-2
Bug#420803: /usr/lib/openoffice/sdk/docs/DevelopersGuide_intro.html corrupt
Bug ma
Your message dated Mon, 10 Dec 2007 11:04:06 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#455469: openoffice.org: Meta-Package has no
Installation-Candidate in Version 2.3.1 in Experimental
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that t
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.11
> notfixed 454463 1:2.3.0.dfsg-3
Bug#454463: openoffice.org: CVE-2007-4575 possibly arbitrary code execution
through crafted database files
Bug no longer marked as fixed in version 1:
Package: openoffice.org
Version: 1:2.3.1~rc1-1
Severity: important
openoffice.org has no installation candidate. So you have to install all modul
packages separately.
I post the complete message (in German) which I get whe I try it.
apt-get install -t experimental openoffice.org
Paketlisten wer
7 matches
Mail list logo
