Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> close 423636 1:2.3.0~oog680m2-1
Bug#423636: oowriter: spits repeated glib/gdk assertion errors
'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing.
Bug marked as fixed in version 1:2.3.0~oog680m2-1, send any further
explanations to
Your message dated Sat, 25 Aug 2007 00:14:44 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#423636: Fixed in latest openoffice.org
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Hello,
> > Thanks for the pointer. Do you perhaps know of tools/docs describing
> > the process of [changed menu settings] -> [changed ~/.openoffice2
> > files] -> correct .xcu files?
>
> eh? Look at the example. Just add the snippets you need. Use your
> favourite editor and look. If you want to
Just got these today, after upgrading to 2.2.1-8
% dpkg -s openoffice.org
Package: openoffice.org
Status: install ok installed
Priority: optional
Section: editors
Installed-Size: 260
Maintainer: Debian OpenOffice Team
Architecture: i386
Version: 2.2.1-8
% openoffice
/usr/lib/openoffice/progr
Hi,
Sven Joachim wrote:
> The latest upload of openoffice.org-draw to unstable added a
> dependency on libwpg-0.1-1 which is of priority "extra". This
> priority needs to be bumped to "optional".
Yep, I noticed to late that (damn, dh_make which defaults to extra now)
that I uploaded with the wro
Hi,
Radim X. wrote:
> > > able to figure out was how to do this correctly in Debian. Copy an
> > > ~/.openoffice.org2 template to /etc/openoffice? Parts of it? Something
> > > completely different?
> >
> > You can deploy a extension with the configuration data. See
> > openoffice.org-ctl-he for an
> > able to figure out was how to do this correctly in Debian. Copy an
> > ~/.openoffice.org2 template to /etc/openoffice? Parts of it? Something
> > completely different?
>
> You can deploy a extension with the configuration data. See
> openoffice.org-ctl-he for an example.
Thanks for the pointer
Hi,
Michael Biebl wrote:
> There are others (sablevm, kaffee). sun-java(5,6)-jre are in non-free.
OOo doesn't support sablevm or kaffe. I know that sun-java* is in
non-free, but that doesn't make non-free to a part of Debian (which is
per definiton the "main" section).
> > Sun JDK is not in main
Hi,
Radim X. wrote:
> For a single desktop user, it is of no interest - his/her preferences
> are saved under ~/.openoffice.org2, which is fine. However, a
> systemwide or LAN-wide installation clearly needs the possibility of
> saving default settings to some central location, which would overrid
Rene Engelhard schrieb:
>
>> which in turn puls libgcj and all its dependencies. I already have a
>> java-runtime installed and don't want an additional java-runtime.
>
> And java-gcj-compat (and therefore gij) is the default runtime on sid.
> The rest (sun?) is not even in Debian.
There are ot
Hello,
I'd like to ask about suggested ways of ooo's configuration in Debian.
The topic has been around a while (see #293176, closed couple of days
ago, apparently due to the fact that nobody bothered to confirm it
against a 2.x version), but I couldn't google any reasonable docs on
this.
For a s
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> found 439287 1:2.3.0~oog680m2-1
Bug#439287: Dependency on openoffice.org-officebean
Bug marked as found in version 1:2.3.0~oog680m2-1.
> severity 439287 wishlist
Bug#439287: Dependency on openoffice.org-officebean
Severity set to `wishlist' from `impor
found 439287 1:2.3.0~oog680m2-1
severity 439287 wishlist
thanks
Hi,
Michael Biebl wrote:
> The openoffice.org package has a Depends on openoffice.org-officebean,
This is deliberate change in -8.
> which in turn puls libgcj and all its dependencies. I already have a
> java-runtime installed an
13 matches
Mail list logo
