Re: Bug#422530: more details, retry without -gtk

Mirco Bauer debian.org> writes: > > Rene also asked me to retry after removing -gtk, here the result: > > meebey redbull:~$ sudo apt-get remove openoffice.org-gtk > Password: > Reading package lists... Done > Building dependency tree... Done > The following packages will be REMOVED: > openof

Bug#422870: openoffice.org: Confirm problem

Package: openoffice.org Version: 2.2.0-6 Followup-For: Bug #422870 On my system I have exactly the same problem. Also, after manually installing an extension using the unopkg tool, the extension does show up in the menu, it seems that it cannot be used (I guess that it tries to open a window).

Bug#423184: X driver

Hello my X driver is ati from xorg, no propietary driver here... setting OPENGL_SUPPORT to no does not change anything. sorry pgpyYMJYupsSY.pgp Description: PGP signature

Bug#423030: Does not work either

Hi, Thank you for the reply. Sorry for my previous confusion about ooimpress and oowriter. I tried with oowriter too. I removed .openoffice.org2 and restarted "oowriter Mini\ Raport.odt", the same problem appeared: it entered recovery. (Maybe a powerpc problem ?) -- Eugen Dedu -- To UNSU

Bug#411693: same bug with 2.2 version

Hi all, I've installed Debian again from testing recently and upgraded it to lenny/sid. The bug is still here. I've also installed openoffice.org-dbg to give a more useful bug report, but I still don't have any backtrace (what's wrong?). What have I to do to generate a useful bug report? -

Bug#423215: Changelog entry for amd64 but no change

Package: oooqs Version: 2.0.3-8 The changelog for version 2.0.3-8 says that it enabled amd64 but it's still not enabled in debian/control. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Processed: Re: Bug#423184: openoffice.org: Segfaults on startup

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 423184 + moreinfo Bug#423184: openoffice.org: Segfaults on startup There were no tags set. Tags added: moreinfo > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator,

Bug#423184: openoffice.org: Segfaults on startup

tag 423184 + moreinfo thanks Hi, BARBIER Jean-Matthieu wrote: > On a fresh installation of Openoffice (unstable), openoffice gives a segfault > on startup : > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ /usr/lib/openoffice/program/soffice.bin > Erreur de segmentation Which X driver? There is a known segfault with

Re: OO.org and java

On 5/10/07, Rene Engelhard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, Miso Liptak wrote: > On 5/10/07, Rene Engelhard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >Miso Liptak wrote: > >> On 5/10/07, Мажурин И. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> >Ð' Ñ Ð¾Ð¾Ð±Ñ‰ÐµÐ½Ð¸Ð¸ от Thursday 10 May 2007 12:45:13 Miso Liptak > >

Re: OO.org and java

Hi, Miso Liptak wrote: > On 5/10/07, Rene Engelhard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >Miso Liptak wrote: > >> On 5/10/07, Мажурин И. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> >В сообщении от Thursday 10 May 2007 12:45:13 Miso Liptak > >> >написал(а): > >> >> Hi, > >> >> does OO.org 2.2.0 works with Java 1.5 or

Re: OO.org and java

В сообщении от Thursday 10 May 2007 13:52:55 Miso Liptak написал(а): > sudo aptitude install openoffice.org-java-common #dpkg -s openoffice.org-java-common Package: openoffice.org-java-common Status: install ok installed Priority: optional Section: editors Installed-Size: 3752 Maintainer: Debian

Bug#422492: marked as done (crashes with OPENGL_SUPPORT=yes and nvidia driver)

Your message dated Thu, 10 May 2007 09:48:01 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#422492: fixed in openoffice.org 2.2.0-7 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#422530: marked as done (ooffice doesn't start, component manager not available, dies with segfault)

Your message dated Thu, 10 May 2007 09:48:01 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#422530: fixed in openoffice.org 2.2.0-7 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Re: OO.org and java

On 5/10/07, Rene Engelhard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Miso Liptak wrote: > On 5/10/07, Мажурин И. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >В сообщении от Thursday 10 May 2007 12:45:13 Miso Liptak > >написал(а): > >> Hi, > >> does OO.org 2.2.0 works with Java 1.5 or Java 6 from Debian Unstable? > >> Because

openoffice.org_2.2.0-7_source+powerpc+all.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: broffice.org_2.2.0-7_all.deb to pool/main/o/openoffice.org/broffice.org_2.2.0-7_all.deb libmythes-dev_2.2.0-7_powerpc.deb to pool/main/o/openoffice.org/libmythes-dev_2.2.0-7_powerpc.deb mozilla-openoffice.org_2.2.0-7_powerpc.deb to pool/main/o/openoffice.org/mozilla-openoffice.org_

Re: OO.org and java

Miso Liptak wrote: > On 5/10/07, Мажурин И. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >В сообщении от Thursday 10 May 2007 12:45:13 Miso Liptak > >написал(а): > >> Hi, > >> does OO.org 2.2.0 works with Java 1.5 or Java 6 from Debian Unstable? > >> Because on my PC it does not find any JRE and when trying to sp

Processing of openoffice.org_2.2.0-7_source+powerpc+all.changes

openoffice.org_2.2.0-7_source+powerpc+all.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: openoffice.org-officebean_2.2.0-7_powerpc.deb openoffice.org-help-hu_2.2.0-7_all.deb openoffice.org-l10n-tn_2.2.0-7_all.deb openoffice.org-l10n-hi-in_2.2.0-7_all.deb openoffice.org-

Bug#423021: openoffice.org: andromeda style cannot be removed

severity 423021 wishlist retitle 423021 please don't depends on -style-andromeda reassign 423021 openoffice.org-common tag 423021 - patch tag 423021 + wontfix thanks Dieter J�ger wrote: > The default openoffice style andromeda is bound by dependency to openoffice.org-common. Right. > Through thi

Processed: Re: Bug#423021: openoffice.org: andromeda style cannot be removed

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 423021 wishlist Bug#423021: openoffice.org: andromeda style cannot be removed Severity set to `wishlist' from `normal' > retitle 423021 please don't depends on -style-andromeda Bug#423021: openoffice.org: andromeda style cannot be removed Chan

Re: OO.org and java

On 5/10/07, Мажурин И. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: В сообщении от Thursday 10 May 2007 12:45:13 Miso Liptak написал(а): > Hi, > does OO.org 2.2.0 works with Java 1.5 or Java 6 from Debian Unstable? > Because on my PC it does not find any JRE and when trying to specify > the path manually, it says

Re: Etch: openoffice.org-deb package: assistants for forms, queries and reports do not start

Steffen Mutter wrote: > The problem I have is already mentioned i n the subject and it is very > easy to check: > Open OpenOffice.org-base and create a new database and set it up, create > a table. > I have the error at all my machines running debian or ubuntu. The only > one where at least the for

Re: OO.org and java

В сообщении от Thursday 10 May 2007 12:45:13 Miso Liptak написал(а): > Hi, > does OO.org 2.2.0 works with Java 1.5 or Java 6 from Debian Unstable? > Because on my PC it does not find any JRE and when trying to specify > the path manually, it says the folder does not contain JRE.. > Thanks > m. yes

Bug#353003: marked as done (openoffice programs crash when using digital signatures)

Your message dated Thu, 10 May 2007 10:48:57 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line fixed in 2.0.3+2.0.4m179-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your respons

Processed: merge

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > merge 420347 406778 Bug#406778: openoffice.org-common: Circular depends with openoffice.org-style-andromeda Bug#420347: openoffice.org-common: circular dependency with openoffice.org-style-andromeda Merged 406778 420347. > thanks Stopping processing

OO.org and java

Hi, does OO.org 2.2.0 works with Java 1.5 or Java 6 from Debian Unstable? Because on my PC it does not find any JRE and when trying to specify the path manually, it says the folder does not contain JRE.. Thanks m. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Tro