Bug#386763: openoffice.org-dtd-officedocument1.0: installation fails

Package: openoffice.org-dtd-officedocument1.0 Version: 2.0.4~rc1-1 Severity: grave # apt-get install openoffice.org-dtd-officedocument1.0 Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree... Done The following NEW packages will be installed: openoffice.org-dtd-officedocument1.0 0 upgraded,

Bug#373579: marked as done (openoffice.org: no orientation option in printer dialogue)

Your message dated Sat, 09 Sep 2006 01:51:45 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#353595: fixed in openoffice.org 2.0.4~rc1-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case i

Bug#336284: marked as done (python-uno: python2.4-uno would be appreciated)

Your message dated Sat, 09 Sep 2006 01:51:21 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#336284: fixed in openoffice.org 2.0.4~rc1-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case i

Bug#360489: marked as done (upgrading from sarge to etch remove openoffice.org)

Your message dated Sat, 09 Sep 2006 01:52:01 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#360489: fixed in openoffice.org 2.0.4~rc1-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case i

Bug#321876: marked as done (openoffice.org: Split off XML Catalog stuff to a separate package)

Your message dated Sat, 09 Sep 2006 01:50:47 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#321876: fixed in openoffice.org 2.0.4~rc1-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case i

Bug#332194: marked as done (openoffice.org: Can't insert/reproduce sound in OO documents)

Your message dated Sat, 09 Sep 2006 01:51:00 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#332194: fixed in openoffice.org 2.0.4~rc1-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case i

Bug#364814: marked as done (can you switch to stlport5?)

Your message dated Sat, 09 Sep 2006 01:52:03 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#364814: fixed in openoffice.org 2.0.4~rc1-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case i

Bug#353595: marked as done (openoffice.org: no orientation option in printer dialogue)

Your message dated Sat, 09 Sep 2006 01:51:45 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#353595: fixed in openoffice.org 2.0.4~rc1-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case i

Bug#384727: marked as done (openoffice.org-2.0.4~ood680m1 failes to compile on amd64, tries to find unowinreg.dll)

Your message dated Sat, 09 Sep 2006 01:52:04 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#384727: fixed in openoffice.org 2.0.4~rc1-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case i

Processing of openoffice.org_2.0.4~rc1-1_source+powerpc+all.changes

openoffice.org_2.0.4~rc1-1_source+powerpc+all.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: openoffice.org-l10n-en-za_2.0.4~rc1-1_all.deb openoffice.org-qa-api-tests_2.0.4~rc1-1_all.deb openoffice.org-l10n-sl_2.0.4~rc1-1_all.deb openoffice.org-l10n-hr_2.0.4~rc1-1_all.deb

Bug#383312: marked as done (Please package OpenOffice.org DTD independently)

Your message dated Sat, 09 Sep 2006 01:50:47 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#321876: fixed in openoffice.org 2.0.4~rc1-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case i

Bug#245861: marked as done (openoffice.org: no largefile support)

Your message dated Sat, 09 Sep 2006 01:50:39 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#245861: fixed in openoffice.org 2.0.4~rc1-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case i

Bug#373974: marked as done (openoffice.org-writer: Does not save printer and paper and bin settings.)

Your message dated Sat, 09 Sep 2006 01:52:04 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#373974: fixed in openoffice.org 2.0.4~rc1-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case i

Bug#335266: marked as done (openoffice.org-common: Dependance on openoffice.org-l10n-en-us, why not | openoffice.org-l10n-2.0.0 ?)

Your message dated Sat, 09 Sep 2006 01:51:11 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#335266: fixed in openoffice.org 2.0.4~rc1-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case i

Bug#346183: marked as done (openoffice.org-common depends on l10n-en-us)

Your message dated Sat, 09 Sep 2006 01:51:11 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#335266: fixed in openoffice.org 2.0.4~rc1-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case i

openoffice.org_2.0.4~rc1-1_source+powerpc+all.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: libmythes-dev_2.0.4~rc1-1_powerpc.deb to pool/main/o/openoffice.org/libmythes-dev_2.0.4~rc1-1_powerpc.deb openoffice.org-base_2.0.4~rc1-1_powerpc.deb to pool/main/o/openoffice.org/openoffice.org-base_2.0.4~rc1-1_powerpc.deb openoffice.org-calc_2.0.4~rc1-1_powerpc.deb to pool/main/o