Bug#380414: Illegal system call of soffice.bin -> OpenOffice 2.0.3 does not start

| Or the OOo upstream added some (new/changed) i686 inline asm during their speedup work... Seriously ? How can i find the right answer ? Will UPS be notified of this issue ? I mean, there are plenty non-i686 processors out (even more advanced ones). m°

Bug#380414: Illegal system call of soffice.bin -> OpenOffice 2.0.3 does not start

| > Linux woody 2.6.13.2-1 #1 Sun Nov 27 06:52:07 CET 2005 i586 GNU/Linux | | Oh, old kernel... Also with 2.6.15 and 2.6.16. | But the problem here might be the i586 ok. So what... I have a K6, and chose this option in the kernel

Bug#380556: can't see images in .doc

Package: openoffice.org-common Version: 2.0.2-3 Severity: minor $ wget http://www.sow.org.tw/english/indx/funding_and_finance.doc $ openoffice funding_and_finance.doc doesn't show the images that $ wvHtml funding_and_finance.doc ff.html $ firefox ff.html does. And none nor catdoc shows the text t

Bug#380513: openoffice.org-writer: 2.0.3 has wrong colors and misses text in anchored frames

[ please let the bug in the CC, thanks ] Hi, Thomas Zander wrote: > On Sunday 30 July 2006 20:32, you wrote: > > > It also happened in 2.0.3-2 and I used reportbug only today (as I > > > wanted to upgrade first, see if the problem went away) > > > > OK, and can you check whether that's a problem

Bug#380513: openoffice.org-writer: 2.0.3 has wrong colors and misses text in anchored frames

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Rene Engelhard wrote: > No. Just get upstreams rpms[1] and try with those. > (Or the debs from Pavel Janik from ftp.linux.cz[2], currently down, though) Seems to work now, have to wait a bit longer, though... Regards, Rene -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE--

Bug#380513: openoffice.org-writer: 2.0.3 has wrong colors and misses text in anchored frames

notfound 380513 2.0.3-3 found 380513 2.0.3-2 tag 380513 + confirmed thanks Hi, Thomas Zander wrote: > > And if you mean 2.0.2 -> 2.0.3 upgrade, did it also happen in 2.0.3-2? > > Why are you reporting it against 2.0.3-3 then? > > It also happened in 2.0.3-2 and I used reportbug only today (as I

Processed: Re: Bug#380513: openoffice.org-writer: 2.0.3 has wrong colors and misses text in anchored frames

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > notfound 380513 2.0.3-3 Bug#380513: openoffice.org-writer: 2.0.3 has wrong colors and misses text in anchored frames Bug marked as not found in version 2.0.3-3. > found 380513 2.0.3-2 Bug#380513: openoffice.org-writer: 2.0.3 has wrong colors and misse

Bug#380513: openoffice.org-writer: 2.0.3 has wrong colors and misses text in anchored frames

On Sunday 30 July 2006 19:35, Rene Engelhard wrote: > Thomas Zander wrote: > > Severity: grave > > Justification: causes non-serious data loss > > Wow. And it is grave because _some_ feature doesn't work anymore. Come > on... Anchored frames are a basic thing and lots of documents depend on them.

Processed: Re: Bug#380513: openoffice.org-writer: 2.0.3 has wrong colors and misses text in anchored frames

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 380513 important Bug#380513: openoffice.org-writer: 2.0.3 has wrong colors and misses text in anchored frames Severity set to `important' from `grave' > tag 380513 + moreinfo Bug#380513: openoffice.org-writer: 2.0.3 has wrong colors and misse

Bug#380513: openoffice.org-writer: 2.0.3 has wrong colors and misses text in anchored frames

severity 380513 important tag 380513 + moreinfo thanks Thomas Zander wrote: > Subject: openoffice.org-writer: 2.0.3 has wrong colors and misses text in > anchored frames > Package: openoffice.org-writer > Version: 2.0.3-3 > Severity: grave > Justification: causes non-serious data loss Wow. And i

Bug#380513: openoffice.org-writer: 2.0.3 has wrong colors and misses text in anchored frames

Subject: openoffice.org-writer: 2.0.3 has wrong colors and misses text in anchored frames Package: openoffice.org-writer Version: 2.0.3-3 Severity: grave Justification: causes non-serious data loss In upgrading from 2.0.2 to 2.0.3 I found that writer stopped being able to display anchored frames

Bug#380414: Illegal system call of soffice.bin -> OpenOffice 2.0.3 does not start

Rene Engelhard wrote: > OOo is built with -mtune=pentiumpro since long ago (1.0.1-6...[1]) - > otherwise it would be even more > slow, see the changelog - which is a i686... Might be it just happened to use > a i686-specific > instruction right now (changed gcc etc.) Or the OOo upstream added so

Processed: Re: Bug#377261: openoffice.org-common: Me too (while upgrading to 2.0.3-3)

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > notfound 377261 2.0.3-3 Bug#377261: warning about /etc/xml/openoffice.org-common.xml when unpacking openoffice.org-common (misplaced exit 0??) Bug marked as not found in version 2.0.3-3. (By the way, this Bug is currently marked as done.) > thanks Sto

Bug#377261: openoffice.org-common: Me too (while upgrading to 2.0.3-3)

notfound 377261 2.0.3-3 thanks Bernardo Dal Seno wrote: > I've just upgraded my sid installation (apt-get upgrade) and got the same > error: > > Preparing to replace openoffice.org-common 2.0.3-2 (using > .../openoffice.org-common_2.0.3-3_all.deb) ... > update-xmlcatalog: error: entity not regis

Bug#380414: Illegal system call of soffice.bin -> OpenOffice 2.0.3 does not start

retitle 380414 illegal instruction on i586 tag 380414 + wontfix thanks Hi, Micha wrote: > $ oowriter > /usr/lib/openoffice/program/soffice: line 252: 13678 Illegal instruction > "$sd_prog/$sd_binary" "$@" Hmm. > $ uname -a > Linux woody 2.6.13.2-1 #1 Sun Nov 27 06:52:07 CET 2005 i586 GNU/Linu

Bug#380420: openoffice.org: Segmentation fault on startup.

retitle 380420 openoffice.org: Segmentation fault on startup when sofficerc not present tag 380420 + pending thanks Hi, Tobbe Eriksson wrote: > After installing OO.org i get this the first time I run any of the > applications: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ /usr/bin/oowriter > fopen() failed.: No su

Processed: Re: Bug#380414: Illegal system call of soffice.bin -> OpenOffice 2.0.3 does not start

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > retitle 380414 illegal instruction on i586 Bug#380414: Illegal system call of soffice.bin -> OpenOffice 2.0.3 does not start Changed Bug title. > tag 380414 + wontfix Bug#380414: illegal instruction on i586 There were no tags set. Tags added: wontfix

Processed: Re: Bug#380420: openoffice.org: Segmentation fault on startup.

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > retitle 380420 openoffice.org: Segmentation fault on startup when sofficerc > not present Bug#380420: openoffice.org: Segmentation fault on startup. Changed Bug title. > tag 380420 + pending Bug#380420: openoffice.org: Segmentation fault on startup wh