Re: OOo for mips

2006-04-07 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* Rene Engelhard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-03-24 15:44]: > mips or mipsel? Or both? Is there some fast machine available to > build/test it on? (except the buildds...) The work has been done by Fuxin Zhang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on mipsel. I wanted to take a look, clean it up and then send it to you,

Bug#361216: acknowledged by developer (Re: Bug#361216: Reinstalling dictionaries-common)

2006-04-07 Thread Agustin Martin
On Fri, Apr 07, 2006 at 04:58:32PM +0200, Max Gilead wrote: > Hello! > > > > Max Gilead wrote: > > > > I found on packages.debian.org that the missing script is located in > > > > dictionaries-common package so I tried reinstalling it and it worked. So > > > > *something* is broken, but not necess

Bug#361216: acknowledged by developer (Re: Bug#361216: Reinstalling dictionaries-common)

2006-04-07 Thread Max Gilead
Hello! > > Max Gilead wrote: > > > I found on packages.debian.org that the missing script is located in > > > dictionaries-common package so I tried reinstalling it and it worked. So > > > *something* is broken, but not necessarily the post-install script. Log > > > below. > > and note that openof

Bug#335897: openoffice.org: same issue with configuration files.

2006-04-07 Thread Jean-Michel
Package: openoffice.org Version: 2.0.1-5 Followup-For: Bug #335897 It seems the same issue occurs, with congigurations files (directory .openoffice.org) located on an nfs server. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing'), (500,

Bug#361216: marked as done (openoffice.org: Unable to install OO.org due to broken postinst script)

2006-04-07 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 7 Apr 2006 15:48:53 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#361216: Reinstalling dictionaries-common has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Rendering engine of OpenOffice.org 2.0.x.

2006-04-07 Thread priti Patil
Hi list, I am wondering how non Latin text are rendered in OpenOffice.org 2.0.x? Does it uses client side libraries of x window system or server side libraries? Can we let the text go to server side library of x window system for shaping/proper rendering? Alternatively can we allow OOo to use c

Bug#360714: Works

2006-04-07 Thread Max Gilead
Hi Rene! Sorry for making trouble -- I guess it was issue with some library upgraded during recent system upgrade. The machine I was having problems with is at work and it's not rebooted or even X aren't restarted very frequently. This time restarting X server fixed the issue. Thanks, Max --

Bug#361216: Reinstalling dictionaries-common

2006-04-07 Thread Max Gilead
I found on packages.debian.org that the missing script is located in dictionaries-common package so I tried reinstalling it and it worked. So *something* is broken, but not necessarily the post-install script. Log below. Regards, Max # apt-get install --reinstall dictionaries-common Reading pac

Bug#361231: hunspell: Hunspell does not recognize "zentralen" but it's in the dic

2006-04-07 Thread Christian Frommeyer
Package: hunspell Version: 1.1.4-3 Severity: normal Hi, I just was a bit surprised to find out Hunspell (with de_DE dictionary) does not recognize "zentralen" as correct and suggest "zentrale", "zentralem", "zentrales" and "zentraler". All these words have "zentral" as root and are created from

Bug#361216: openoffice.org: Unable to install OO.org due to broken postinst script

2006-04-07 Thread Max Gilead
Package: openoffice.org Version: 2.0.2-2 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Just tried to re-install OpenOffice.org. I removed all packages and now, when trying to install... :( Log below. Regards, Max # apt-get install ttf-opensymbol openoffice.org openoffice.org-help-en