Hi,
Julien Langer wrote:
> On So, 2006-03-26 at 16:01 +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> > Julien Langer wrote:
> > > Seems like this error was caused by an old version of
> > > openoffice.org-gnome.
> > > I upgraded the openoffice.org-gnome package from 2.0.1-5 to 2.0.2-2 and
> > > now everything wor
On So, 2006-03-26 at 16:01 +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> Julien Langer wrote:
> > Seems like this error was caused by an old version of
> > openoffice.org-gnome.
> > I upgraded the openoffice.org-gnome package from 2.0.1-5 to 2.0.2-2 and
> > now everything works fine again.
>
> Ah. Thanks. Althou
[ Cc'ing Emmanuel Fleury <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> who also did build
unofficial, broken amd64 debs for 2.0.1-1 and provided them publically.
also Cc'ing -amd64 ]
Hi,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Modify debian/control file
>append amd64 on Architecture: for each necessary packages.
Wrong. (although
Hi,
Ambrose Li wrote:
> In OOo 2.0's Presentation, there is a Task Pane that is impossible to disable.
> This makes the effective work area for the slide really small compared to
> OOo 1.4, and make the screen "jump" (very annoying) if the slide contains an
> OLE table and the user tries to edit t
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 358570 + pending
Bug#358570: openoffice.org: signal 11 on startup
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, De
tag 358570 + pending
thanks
Julien Langer wrote:
> Seems like this error was caused by an old version of
> openoffice.org-gnome.
> I upgraded the openoffice.org-gnome package from 2.0.1-5 to 2.0.2-2 and
> now everything works fine again.
Ah. Thanks. Although I wonder how you got that mismatch; pr
6 matches
Mail list logo
