On Wed, 18 Jan 2006 16:08:32 +0900
YABUKI Yukiharu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In My Option:
> When we use gcc 4.0.1 or later, we will evaluate 'cws-i18nshrink.diff' and
> 'buildfix-gcc41-friend-decl-i18npool.diff' again.
I mistake. I mean that fix '-fvisibity=hidden' version.
I used gcc :
[EM
On Mon, 16 Jan 2006 11:29:56 +0100
Martin Kretzschmar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Just disable the gcc41 patches. Shouldn't be a problem because you're
> using gcc 4.0
>
> HTH,
Thank you. > Hope this Helps
I can rebuild. And I re-check libdict_ja.so. It is also fine.
It is better way to fix
Your message dated Tue, 17 Jan 2006 16:33:50 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#347787: fixed in openoffice.org 2.0.1-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Tue, 17 Jan 2006 16:33:50 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#347491: fixed in openoffice.org 2.0.1-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Tue, 17 Jan 2006 16:33:50 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#345611: fixed in openoffice.org 2.0.1-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Tue, 17 Jan 2006 16:33:50 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#344718: fixed in openoffice.org 2.0.1-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Tue, 17 Jan 2006 16:33:50 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#343011: fixed in openoffice.org 2.0.1-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Tue, 17 Jan 2006 16:33:50 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#343343: fixed in openoffice.org 2.0.1-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Accepted:
openoffice.org-help-cs_2.0.1-2_all.deb
to pool/contrib/o/openoffice.org-help/openoffice.org-help-cs_2.0.1-2_all.deb
openoffice.org-help-de_2.0.1-2_all.deb
to pool/contrib/o/openoffice.org-help/openoffice.org-help-de_2.0.1-2_all.deb
openoffice.org-help-en-us_2.0.1-2_all.deb
to
pool
Accepted:
libmythes-dev_2.0.1-2_i386.deb
to pool/main/o/openoffice.org/libmythes-dev_2.0.1-2_i386.deb
mozilla-openoffice.org_2.0.1-2_i386.deb
to pool/main/o/openoffice.org/mozilla-openoffice.org_2.0.1-2_i386.deb
openoffice.org-base_2.0.1-2_i386.deb
to pool/main/o/openoffice.org/openoffice.or
openoffice.org_2.0.1-2_source+i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
openoffice.org-l10n-el_2.0.1-2_all.deb
openoffice.org-l10n-pt-br_2.0.1-2_all.deb
openoffice.org-l10n-zh-cn_2.0.1-2_all.deb
openoffice.org-core_2.0.1-2_i386.deb
openoffice.org-gtk-gnome_2.0.
openoffice.org-help_2.0.1-2_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
openoffice.org-help_2.0.1-2.dsc
openoffice.org-help_2.0.1-2.diff.gz
openoffice.org-help-en-us_2.0.1-2_all.deb
openoffice.org-help-cs_2.0.1-2_all.deb
openoffice.org-help-de_2.0.1-2_all.deb
o
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
FYI, the exact error message is
The connection to the data source 'test' could not be established.
libhsqldb2: file not found
(when working on a document named "test.odb".)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFD
Your message dated Tue, 17 Jan 2006 19:23:22 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#343758: HSQLDB access fails with "no hsqldb2.so in
java.library.path"
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I seem to have mixed up bug numbers here. This bug is indeed gone. I
confused it with #340468.
Very sorry for the inconvenience.
Marcus
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFDzS1EXjXn6TzcAQkRAp/ZAKCu8e9TKMUOL5UrWLMJc
reopen 343758
found 343758 2.0.0-5
thanks
Am Dienstag 17 Januar 2006 12:53 schrieb Marcus Better:
> I'm sorry to say that the bug still appears with 2.0.1-1, despite my
> earlier messages. So it will have to be reopened.
:-(
>
> This is both with gij and Sun JRE.
With exact the same error? Or wi
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reopen 343758
Bug#343758: openoffice.org-base: HSQLDB access fails with "no hsqldb2.so in
java.library.path"
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
> found 343758 2.0.0-5
Bug#343758: openoffice.org-base: HSQLDB access fails with "no hsqldb2.so in
java
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I'm sorry to say that the bug still appears with 2.0.1-1, despite my
earlier messages. So it will have to be reopened.
This is both with gij and Sun JRE.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFDzNrKXjXn6TzcAQkRArmFAJ9i
my e-mail is not going
through
19 matches
Mail list logo
