Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 337735 oooqs-kde: fails to install
Bug#337735: oooqs-kde: fails to install
Changed Bug title.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debia
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 337735 oooqs-kde: fails to install - needs update for OOo2
Bug#337735: oooqs-kde: fails to install
Changed Bug title.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrat
68371791 22 5835268919979 19 59413 137439 1141
79 91 38 35 69 18 86 36 112 562 53 78 3412 37 59
71 75 86 54 25 89 17 35 2964 5573 46 34 78 4437
67482973 877432967 61 45 82277953 19 281 85 84 55 18
Package: openoffice.org
Usertag: g++-3.4
This package build-depends for some reason on g++-3.4 (most likely,
because it could not be built with a newer g++ version. We would
like to get rid of g++-3.4 for the etch release, although currently
not a hard release goal.
Please (re)check, if the pack
Your message dated Sun, 11 Dec 2005 15:06:07 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#342612: fixed in openoffice.org 2.0.0-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Sun, 11 Dec 2005 15:06:07 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#342610: fixed in openoffice.org 2.0.0-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Sun, 11 Dec 2005 15:06:07 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#342610: fixed in openoffice.org 2.0.0-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Sun, 11 Dec 2005 15:06:07 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#341271: fixed in openoffice.org 2.0.0-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Sun, 11 Dec 2005 15:06:07 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#340468: fixed in openoffice.org 2.0.0-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Accepted:
libmythes-dev_2.0.0-5_i386.deb
to pool/main/o/openoffice.org/libmythes-dev_2.0.0-5_i386.deb
mozilla-openoffice.org_2.0.0-5_i386.deb
to pool/main/o/openoffice.org/mozilla-openoffice.org_2.0.0-5_i386.deb
openoffice.org-base_2.0.0-5_i386.deb
to pool/main/o/openoffice.org/openoffice.or
Your message dated Sun, 11 Dec 2005 23:23:13 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
has caused the Debian Bug report #342791,
regarding hunspell: porting the -g option from ispell
to be marked as having been forwarded to the upstream software
author(s) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(NB: If you are a system
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> forwarded 324637 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#324637: please provide a shared library
Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> forwarded 324639 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#324639: please add information how to build hunspell dictionar
Matej Cepl wrote:
> On Sat 10. December 2005 16:47, Matej Cepl wrote:
> > I am not sure, whether it is correct, but when applied patch
> > from http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=47835, I
> > was able to create new version of package which seems to work.
>
> Correction, no it doesn't
Hi,
given that you seem MIA and didn't fix easy to fix bugs for a long time
and the current ooqstart-gnome needs updates for OOo2 - because OOo2
changed interface and the openoffice.org 2.0.x-y packages conflict against
the current ooqstart-gnome in sid; not to mention that because of this
fact oo
Dan Jacobson wrote:
> Package openoffice.org has broken dep on openoffice.org-writer
> Considering openoffice.org-writer 1 as a solution to openoffice.org -1
> Holding Back openoffice.org rather than change openoffice.org-writer
You must have a old sid, works fine here. And without clear evide
Your message dated Sun, 11 Dec 2005 18:21:14 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Problem gone
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reo
Is this bad?:
Package openoffice.org has broken dep on openoffice.org-writer
Considering openoffice.org-writer 1 as a solution to openoffice.org -1
Holding Back openoffice.org rather than change openoffice.org-writer
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscri
17 matches
Mail list logo
