Re: RESOLVED [was: Re: OOo2 sarge backport fails]

2005-11-30 Thread Giacomo Mulas
On Wed, 30 Nov 2005, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote: Interesting. I have only tried with the Sun JDK, which obviously works. Yes, of course. But I want to have homogeous versions of JDK both on the 64bit and on the 32bit side of my amd64 machines, that's why I chose the blackdown version. Bye Giac

Re: RESOLVED [was: Re: OOo2 sarge backport fails]

2005-11-30 Thread Roberto C. Sanchez
On Wed, Nov 30, 2005 at 01:38:00PM +0100, Giacomo Mulas wrote: > On Wed, 30 Nov 2005, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote: > > >None of the free Java alternatives in Sarge are capable of running OOo2, > >even if it is patched. > > Indeed: that's why (as I said above) on my sarge machines I installed > java-

Re: RESOLVED [was: Re: OOo2 sarge backport fails]

2005-11-30 Thread Giacomo Mulas
On Wed, 30 Nov 2005, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote: None of the free Java alternatives in Sarge are capable of running OOo2, even if it is patched. Indeed: that's why (as I said above) on my sarge machines I installed java-package, then I downloaded the binary packages for the JRE following the dow

Re: RESOLVED [was: Re: OOo2 sarge backport fails]

2005-11-30 Thread Roberto C. Sanchez
On Wed, Nov 30, 2005 at 11:08:59AM +0100, Giacomo Mulas wrote: > On Tue, 29 Nov 2005, Ralph Katz wrote: > > >Wait! After about 6 minutes... watching top, seeing kaffe-bin take 76% > >cpu, I see an OOo logo... and this: > > Your problem is probably a mixed up set of alternatives. Install a comple

Re: RESOLVED [was: Re: OOo2 sarge backport fails]

2005-11-30 Thread Giacomo Mulas
On Tue, 29 Nov 2005, Ralph Katz wrote: Wait! After about 6 minutes... watching top, seeing kaffe-bin take 76% cpu, I see an OOo logo... and this: Your problem is probably a mixed up set of alternatives. Install a complete, working java runtime environment (kaffe apparently is not able to run