Thanks so much for this info! Up and purring like a kitten ... man did I get
a performance boost with this dual amd64/2Gig RAM upgrade ... ;0)
Joh
Clive Menzies wrote:
> On (02/11/05 21:35), Rene Engelhard wrote:
>> Johannes Graumann wrote:
>> > I just came back from prowling the web for the ans
Hi,
Is there any apt-get URL for openoffice 2 .deb for Sarge?
If not, do you plan to backport openoffice 2 packages for sarge?
Thanks in advance,
Pedro
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On (02/11/05 21:35), Rene Engelhard wrote:
> Johannes Graumann wrote:
> > I just came back from prowling the web for the answer to the question on how
> > to best get openoffice running on my swanky new dual amd64 debian unstable
> > box ... and fail to see the situation clearly.
>
> The situation
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 337147 openoffice.org-common
Bug#337147: /etc/bash_completion.d/openoffice: new OpenOffice 2 file formats
not recognized
Bug reassigned from package `openoffice.org-debian-files' to
`openoffice.org-common'.
> retitle 337147 bash completion d
reassign 337147 openoffice.org-common
retitle 337147 bash completion does not work because old 1.1.x info file still
around
thanks
Hi,
Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
> Package: openoffice.org-debian-files
> Version: 1.1.4-6+1
^
> Severity: wishlist
openoffice.org-debian-files is obs
Package: openoffice.org-debian-files
Version: 1.1.4-6+1
Severity: wishlist
Hi,
It would be nice of the bash completion stuff for OpenOffice could
regnonize the new file formats introduced by OpenOffice.org 2 (like odt
for texts, odp for presentations, etc.).
Thanks,
Thomas
-- System Informati
Hi,
Johannes Graumann wrote:
> I just came back from prowling the web for the answer to the question on how
> to best get openoffice running on my swanky new dual amd64 debian unstable
> box ... and fail to see the situation clearly.
The situation is: use a chroot with the 32-bit stuff. The nativ
Hello,
I just came back from prowling the web for the answer to the question on how
to best get openoffice running on my swanky new dual amd64 debian unstable
box ... and fail to see the situation clearly.
Would anybody mind letting me know the current state of the art way of
getting it to work -
Your message dated Wed, 2 Nov 2005 15:09:33 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#336633: openoffice.org segfaults on startup
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
On Mon, Oct 31, 2005 at 10:32:47PM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> Nicolas Chauvat wrote:
> > Package: openoffice.org
> > Version: 2.0.0-1
> > Severity: grave
> > Justification: renders package unusable
>
> I can't reproduce that. In any way. It works fine here (except the known
> crash with CJK lo
Your message dated Wed, 2 Nov 2005 09:47:43 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#296143: OO1.1.4 still not doing lanscape rotation on
COM10 envelopes
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
Your message dated Wed, 2 Nov 2005 09:46:28 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line fixed in 2.0.0-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to
12 matches
Mail list logo
