Rene Engelhard wrote:
>>OOo already works with GCC's STL (there are a few namespace-shuffling
>>patches needed, but they're already in the upstream tree). The only reason
>
>
> Sure it will work? See
> http://lists.ximian.com/pipermail/openoffice/2005-August/001090.html (and
> the referenced
> h
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> found 305949 1.1.4-7
Bug#305949: openoffice.org: Unrecognized token in pdf export
Bug marked as found in version 1.1.4-7.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administr
Hi !
Thank you very much for a prompt answer.
Rene Engelhard wrote:
> Hi,
[ ... ]
> The helpcontent2 buils needs Java and the gcj build does not work always.
> And the build of the help needs some non-free, binary-only jars from Sun
> which of course have been removed in the Debian source packa
Hi,
Emmanuel Charpentier wrote:
> openoffice.org2-help is therefore a necessity. openoffice.org2-help-*
> would be even better, of course...
> Are those package difficult to port ?
They are not really buildable atm.
The helpcontent2 buils needs Java and the gcj build does not work always.
And th
Package: openoffice.org2
Version: 1.9.125+2.0beta2-1
Severity: wishlist
The current experimental packages do not provide online help. OOo is
sufficiently rich and heavy for loosing even a seasoned user, trying
to do something unusual for him.
openoffice.org2-help is therefore a necessity. openof
5 matches
Mail list logo
