openoffice.org_1.1.4-6_source+all+i386+powerpc.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: openoffice.org-bin_1.1.4-6_i386.deb to pool/main/o/openoffice.org/openoffice.org-bin_1.1.4-6_i386.deb openoffice.org-bin_1.1.4-6_powerpc.deb to pool/main/o/openoffice.org/openoffice.org-bin_1.1.4-6_powerpc.deb openoffice.org-dev_1.1.4-6_i386.deb to pool/main/o/openoffice.org/openof

Processing of openoffice.org_1.1.4-6_source+all+i386+powerpc.changes

openoffice.org_1.1.4-6_source+all+i386+powerpc.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: openoffice.org-evolution_1.1.4-6_i386.deb openoffice.org-l10n-fi_1.1.4-6_all.deb openoffice.org-l10n-nn_1.1.4-6_all.deb openoffice.org-gnomevfs_1.1.4-6_powerpc.deb openoffice.o

Bug#198694: Why don't you compile OO with -O2 on i386?

Hi René, I compiled 1.1.4-5 with -O2 as described in this bug, and it the resulting OO seems to work fine. Was there a specific reason why you dropped the plan to make this change in the OO packages? cu Adrian -- "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out of

Processed: retitle 322598 to langpacks should provide openoffice.org2-l10m-* instead of openoffice.org-l10n-*

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > retitle 322598 langpacks should provide openoffice.org2-l10m-* instead of > openoffice.org-l10n-* Bug#322598: langpacks hould provide openoffice.org2-l10n-* instead of openoffice.org-l10n-* Changed Bug title. > End of message, stopping processing her

Processed: Bug#322598: Should provide openoffice.org2-l10-* instead of openoffice.org-l10-*

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > retitle 322598 langpacks hould provide openoffice.org2-l10n-* instead of > openoffice.org-l10n-* Bug#322598: Should provide openoffice.org2-l10-* instead of openoffice.org-l10-* Changed Bug title. > reassign 322598 openoffice.org2 Bug#322598: langpack

Bug#322598: Should provide openoffice.org2-l10-* instead of openoffice.org-l10-*

retitle 322598 langpacks hould provide openoffice.org2-l10n-* instead of openoffice.org-l10n-* reassign 322598 openoffice.org2 tag 322598 + pending thanks Hi, Jacek Politowski wrote: > I believe openoffice.org2-l10-pl should have provides field suitable for > openoffice.org 2, not 1.1 version.

Bug#322598: Should provide openoffice.org2-l10-* instead of openoffice.org-l10-*

Package: openoffice.org2-l10n-pl Version: 1.9.114-1 Severity: normal I believe openoffice.org2-l10-pl should have provides field suitable for openoffice.org 2, not 1.1 version. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'ex

Re: oooprelink for OOo2

[..] > But well, it does not work for the moment on my PC (Sid) because OOo2 > does not find "libstlport_gcc.so.4.6". > This is another story, and I hope that my patch (made in about 5 > minutes) helps. I created a link today to fix this issue (linking to /usr/lib/openoffice2/program/libstlport_gc