Bug#316625: marked as done (INTL:vi)

Your message dated Sat, 30 Jul 2005 22:34:56 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line included in 1.1.4-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility

Bug#320047: marked as done (openoffice.org: Don't install, dependencies problem)

Your message dated Sat, 30 Jul 2005 09:36:55 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#317762: fixed in openoffice.org 1.1.4-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#318340: marked as done (openoffice.org: Broken dependency)

Your message dated Sat, 30 Jul 2005 09:36:55 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#317762: fixed in openoffice.org 1.1.4-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#306642: marked as done (openoffice.org: a patch to fix hebrew fonts problems with culmus package version 0.101-2)

Your message dated Sat, 30 Jul 2005 09:36:52 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#306642: fixed in openoffice.org 1.1.4-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

openoffice.org_1.1.4-4_source+i386.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: openoffice.org-bin_1.1.4-4_i386.deb to pool/main/o/openoffice.org/openoffice.org-bin_1.1.4-4_i386.deb openoffice.org-dev_1.1.4-4_i386.deb to pool/main/o/openoffice.org/openoffice.org-dev_1.1.4-4_i386.deb openoffice.org-evolution_1.1.4-4_i386.deb to pool/main/o/openoffice.org/openof

Bug#293015: marked as done (openoffice.org-debian-files: IDL Compiler fails)

Your message dated Sat, 30 Jul 2005 09:36:52 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#293015: fixed in openoffice.org 1.1.4-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#315421: marked as done (openoffice.org-gtk-gnome: Special characters and accents)

Your message dated Sat, 30 Jul 2005 09:36:55 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#315421: fixed in openoffice.org 1.1.4-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#317762: marked as done (openoffice.org-bin: broken dependencies with libmyspell3 and libwpd8)

Your message dated Sat, 30 Jul 2005 09:36:55 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#317762: fixed in openoffice.org 1.1.4-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#316256: marked as done (openoffice.org-bin: dead key and compose key don't work anymore)

Your message dated Sat, 30 Jul 2005 09:36:55 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#316256: fixed in openoffice.org 1.1.4-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Re: No jdbc availlable ?

Em Sun, 24 Jul 2005 14:03:43 +0200, Rene Engelhard escreveu: > http://people.debian.org/~rene/openoffice.org/1.1.3/openoffice.org-java_1.1.3-4_i386.deb Nice to know about this! Nevertheless, I haven't been able to install it in parallel with openoffice.org -- it requests libstlpo

Processing of openoffice.org_1.1.4-4_source+i386.changes

openoffice.org_1.1.4-4_source+i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: openoffice.org-mimelnk_1.1.4-4_all.deb ttf-opensymbol_1.1.4-4_all.deb openoffice.org-l10n-cy_1.1.4-4_all.deb openoffice.org_1.1.4-4.diff.gz openoffice.org-l10n-ns_1.1.4-4_all.deb openoffi