Bug#220226: Status check

2005-07-05 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, Ryan Lovett wrote: > I'm just curious about the status of this bug. Is a PyUNO package > imminent? Yes. See experimental. Although there is some bugs in it still which question its usefulness atm a package exists :) [ And this bug is tagged fixed-in-experimental already FWIW ] Grüße/Regards

Processed: severity of 316951 is serious

2005-07-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 316951 serious Bug#316951: openoffice.org2: compile errors Severity set to `serious'. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs

Bug#316951: openoffice.org2: compile errors

2005-07-05 Thread Brian May
> "Rene" == Rene Engelhard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Rene> I'd wait. Why do you want to rebuild it anyway? Its a long story. Basically I want to convert a Microsoft document to PDF within PHP (Yes, this is yuck). Google research revealed the best way to do this is using python-uno to co

Re: I've tested ooo2 1.9.108-1 for you

2005-07-05 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, Rene Engelhard wrote: > > 2) OOo2 is bringing kaffe to run by default, and is *dog slw* with > > it on my PC at least. Using Blackdown JRE 1.4.2 makes it like 10x > > faster. > > It just takes kaffe with it because some of the dependencies (libraries, > IMHO they should NOT depend on a JV

Re: OOo2 and 64-bits architectures

2005-07-05 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, Jérôme Warnier wrote: > > Yes. > No more comments? Not even a single link to point me to? You didn't ask :) http://porting.openoffice.org/servlets/ReadMsg?list=dev&msgNo=15935 Grüße/Regards, Rene -- .''`. Rene Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer : :' : http://www.debian.org | http:

Re: I've tested ooo2 1.9.108-1 for you

2005-07-05 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, Jérôme Warnier wrote: > 1) I'm using GNOME, and for whatever reason, the icons where not in the > menu after the installation. Logout and back in fixes it. Don't know if > this is a problem in GNOME or in OOo. If you want, I can investigate. Normal I guess. > 2) OOo2 is bringing kaffe to run

myspell_3.0+pre3.1-12_i386.changes is NEW

2005-07-05 Thread Debian Installer
libmyspell-dev_3.1-12_i386.deb to pool/main/m/myspell/libmyspell-dev_3.1-12_i386.deb (new) libmyspell3c2_3.1-12_i386.deb optional libs MySpell spellchecking library MySpell is a Spellchecker as (and derived from) ispell. . This package contains the runtime library for programs using the myspel

Processing of myspell_3.0+pre3.1-12_i386.changes

2005-07-05 Thread Archive Administrator
myspell_3.0+pre3.1-12_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: myspell_3.0+pre3.1-12.dsc myspell_3.0+pre3.1-12.diff.gz libmyspell-dev_3.1-12_i386.deb libmyspell3c2_3.1-12_i386.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAI

I've tested ooo2 1.9.108-1 for you

2005-07-05 Thread Jérôme Warnier
I've tested quickly experimental packages of ooo2 on an up-to-date Sid x86 PC. 1) I'm using GNOME, and for whatever reason, the icons where not in the menu after the installation. Logout and back in fixes it. Don't know if this is a problem in GNOME or in OOo. If you want, I can investigate. 2) O

Processed: severity of 316951 is normal

2005-07-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14 > severity 316951 normal Bug#316951: openoffice.org2: compile errors Severity set to `normal'. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. D

Re: OOo2 and 64-bits architectures

2005-07-05 Thread Jérôme Warnier
Le mardi 05 juillet 2005 à 18:51 +0200, Rene Engelhard a écrit : > Hi, > > Jerome Warnier wrote: > > Finally, is it supposed to build on 64-bits architectures? > > I heard it is not working as expected and OOo 2.0 may well ship without > > official 64-bits architectures. > > Is this right? > > Ye

Bug#220226: Status check

2005-07-05 Thread Ryan Lovett
Hi, I'm just curious about the status of this bug. Is a PyUNO package imminent? Thanks, Ryan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: openoffice.org-gtk-gnome and SCIM

2005-07-05 Thread Martin Kretzschmar
Hi Andre, Andre Caldas schrieb: > When I install the package openoffice.org-gtk-gnome the SCIM input > method does not work. > > I am using debian testing. GNOME, of course. :-) > Also, my locales are set to en_US.UTF-8. I was trying to input in Japanese. Did you try with a Japanese locale? My s

Bug#316951: openoffice.org2: compile errors

2005-07-05 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, Am Dienstag, 5. Juli 2005 13:22 schrieb Brian May: > I get the impression that the cause of problem #1 and #3 were due to > my confusion in java-gcj-compat being split. I believe it was split in #3 not. #3 is just that you changed to a compiler which didn't yet work with the source. #1 is ja

Bug#316951: openoffice.org2: compile errors

2005-07-05 Thread Rene Engelhard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, > > #2. Error that libjawt doesn't exist. This is because it was renamed to > > libgcjawt in version gcc-4.0 4.0.0ds1-9ubuntu1, which is in the Debian > > version. > > > > Solution: > [ snip ] > > I am not stupid. I know what causes this, especi

Bug#316951: openoffice.org2: compile errors

2005-07-05 Thread Brian May
> "Rene" == Rene Engelhard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Rene> Please do TEST whether it is applicable to Debian. This is Rene> the Debian BTS, not the Ubuntu one. i Rene> If it doesn't fail in Debian it's not really a problem for Rene> the Debian BTS (I do accept patches of cou

Re: OOo2 and 64-bits architectures

2005-07-05 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, Jerome Warnier wrote: > Finally, is it supposed to build on 64-bits architectures? > I heard it is not working as expected and OOo 2.0 may well ship without > official 64-bits architectures. > Is this right? Yes. Grüße/Regards, Rene -- .''`. Rene Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer

OOo2 and 64-bits architectures

2005-07-05 Thread Jerome Warnier
Finally, is it supposed to build on 64-bits architectures? I heard it is not working as expected and OOo 2.0 may well ship without official 64-bits architectures. Is this right? Thanks -- Jerome Warnier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> BeezNest -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject o

Processed: tagging 316059

2005-07-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 316059 + pending Bug#316059: does not find libstdc++6 (missing depenency / broken RPATH) Tags were: experimental Tags added: pending > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system

Processed: tagging 315643

2005-07-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 315643 + pending Bug#315643: please enable build for amd64 There were no tags set. Tags added: pending > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator,

Processed: Re: Bug#316951: openoffice.org2: compile errors

2005-07-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 316951 + pending Bug#316951: openoffice.org2: compile errors Tags were: experimental Tags added: pending > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian

Bug#316951: openoffice.org2: compile errors

2005-07-05 Thread Rene Engelhard
tag 316951 + pending thanks Hi, Brian May wrote: > When compiling on a Ubuntu system with gcc-4.0 4.0_4.0.0ds1-11 ported > >from Debian, I noticed some compile errors. I think some of these are > applicable to Debian, so I am reporting my solutions here in case they > can help others. Please do