Bug#300802: Acknowledgement (openoffice.org-bin: segfaults when updating user config)

I tried removing the msttcore (or whatever the name is) fonts, thinking that as the README says, odd fonts might cause problems. It didn't help, though, the segfault still occurs. -- David N. Welton - http://www.dedasys.com/davidw/ Apache, Linux, Tcl Consulting - http://www.dedasys.com/ --

Bug#300802: openoffice.org-bin: segfaults when updating user config

Package: openoffice.org-bin Version: 1.1.3-7 Severity: important [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ oowriter OpenOffice.org for Debian - see /usr/share/doc/openoffice.org/README.Debian.gz Previous version found: OpenOffice.org 1.1.2 upgrading openoffice.org user configuration... /usr/bin/oowriter: line 292: 1

Bug#300772: OpenOffice.org 1.1.2dfsg1-3 in Sarge

Package: openoffice.org 1.1.2dfsg1-3 OpenOffice.org 1.1.2dfsg1-3 in Debian Sarge Hi, :-) I have one Sarge kernel 2.4.27-1-686 installation in standard no-brand-no-name PC computer. Nothing special in configuration. I have installed OO from my original Sarge package (15 CDs from my local vend

Re: Problem with Debian Testing [solved]

Group, Today my (testing) system is upgraded from OOo 1.1.2 to OOo 1.1.3. I ran rm -f ~/.sversionrc ; rm -fr ~/.openoffice ; openoffice and OOo works! Thanks to Debian maintainers. However, I had this problem before: OOo works fine one day, fails the next, in two weeks it works again. I don't kno

Bug#297999: marked as done (openoffice.org-gnomevfs: Does not accept GNOME-VFS URIs)

Your message dated Mon, 21 Mar 2005 06:49:37 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#297999: fixed in openoffice.org 1.1.3-8 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#289800: marked as done (openoffice.org: please enable autosave per default)

Your message dated Mon, 21 Mar 2005 06:49:37 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#289800: fixed in openoffice.org 1.1.3-8 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

openoffice.org-debian-files_1.1.3-8+1_i386.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: openoffice.org-debian-files_1.1.3-8+1.dsc to pool/main/o/openoffice.org-debian-files/openoffice.org-debian-files_1.1.3-8+1.dsc openoffice.org-debian-files_1.1.3-8+1.tar.gz to pool/main/o/openoffice.org-debian-files/openoffice.org-debian-files_1.1.3-8+1.tar.gz openoffice.org-debian-

openoffice.org_1.1.3-8_source+i386.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: openoffice.org-bin_1.1.3-8_i386.deb to pool/main/o/openoffice.org/openoffice.org-bin_1.1.3-8_i386.deb openoffice.org-dev_1.1.3-8_i386.deb to pool/main/o/openoffice.org/openoffice.org-dev_1.1.3-8_i386.deb openoffice.org-evolution_1.1.3-8_i386.deb to pool/main/o/openoffice.org/openof

Bug#297887: marked as done (openoffice.org-debian-files: man 8 oooprelink refers to wrong configuration file)

Your message dated Mon, 21 Mar 2005 06:49:52 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#297887: fixed in openoffice.org-debian-files 1.1.3-8+1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not

Bug#299247: marked as done (openoffice.org-debian-files: noisy purge script)

Your message dated Mon, 21 Mar 2005 06:49:52 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#299247: fixed in openoffice.org-debian-files 1.1.3-8+1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not

Bug#299397: marked as done (openoffice.org-debian-files: Bash completions does not include directories)

Your message dated Mon, 21 Mar 2005 06:49:52 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#299397: fixed in openoffice.org-debian-files 1.1.3-8+1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not

Bug#299430: marked as done (openoffice.org: Please add XML catalog with OO.o DTDs)

Your message dated Mon, 21 Mar 2005 06:49:37 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#299430: fixed in openoffice.org 1.1.3-8 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#300260: marked as done (openoffice.org-bin: Menubar depends on fontconfig)

Your message dated Mon, 21 Mar 2005 06:49:37 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#300260: fixed in openoffice.org 1.1.3-8 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#299673: marked as done (Incorrect 'Suggests' on 'oooqstart-gnome')

Your message dated Mon, 21 Mar 2005 06:49:37 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#299673: fixed in openoffice.org 1.1.3-8 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Processing of openoffice.org_1.1.3-8_source+i386.changes

openoffice.org_1.1.3-8_source+i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: openoffice.org-l10n-he_1.1.3-8_all.deb openoffice.org-l10n-pt-br_1.1.3-8_all.deb openoffice.org-l10n-es_1.1.3-8_all.deb openoffice.org-l10n-fi_1.1.3-8_all.deb openoffice.org-bin_1.1.3-8_i38

Processing of openoffice.org-debian-files_1.1.3-8+1_i386.changes

openoffice.org-debian-files_1.1.3-8+1_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: openoffice.org-debian-files_1.1.3-8+1.dsc openoffice.org-debian-files_1.1.3-8+1.tar.gz openoffice.org-debian-files_1.1.3-8+1_all.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon --

Bug#300688: marked as done (openoffice.org: force users to install openoffice.org-l10n-en, on what basis?)

Your message dated Mon, 21 Mar 2005 10:58:39 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#300688: openoffice.org: force users to install openoffice.org-l10n-en, on what basis? has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has