Bruce Byfield wrote:
> I'm working on an article about the decision to use Java in
> OpenOffice.org. The article will include both positive and negative
> opinions, and talk about how it affects repackagers of OOo, and how they
> are planning on handling the situation.
>
> If possible, I'd like to
Rene Engelhard wrote:
This is my comment. Probably not suitable for a official quote but the
comment of one of the two maintainers.
Would you mind being quoted, or at least cited as the source? Your
comments will be a good example of the problems that the situation causes.
To put it mildly, it so
Anders Breindahl wrote:
P. S.: Bruce, would you post a link to me, when you're done with your article?
I'll write to the debian-openoffice list when it appears.
However, in case I forget, the article is being done for Newsforge, and
I plan on finishing it within the week. That probably means that
I can still reprocuce this crash with 1.1.3-7
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Rene and others,
I truly concur. I find it increasingly worrying that Sun to some extent
considers Java to be okay for a Free office-suite. I also spot the commercial
interest that Sun might have, and I think that this makes OOo less optimal
for the Free Software community -- including Debi
Rene Engelhard wrote:
Hi,
David A. Cobb wrote:
I only discovered the page and the working group by way of the
"back-door." That is, through the OpenOffice.org page on Installing for
Linux. As it is, I would not have read that except for the 2.0 _beta_
announcement -- I already had both a 1.
Hi,
David A. Cobb wrote:
> I only discovered the page and the working group by way of the
> "back-door." That is, through the OpenOffice.org page on Installing for
> Linux. As it is, I would not have read that except for the 2.0 _beta_
> announcement -- I already had both a 1.1.2, and a "1.9.
Rene Engelhard wrote:
Hi,
David A. Cobb wrote:
I guess I need to start with, "Is anyone here awake?" I see that
No, the question here is where you were the last months.
OK. Any of the months from June 2004 through February 2005, mostly
trying to get a stable and working Debian insta
Update of /cvs/debian-openoffice/openoffice.debian.net/WML/INCLUDES
In directory gluck:/tmp/cvs-serv12766/WML/INCLUDES
Modified Files:
body.wmi
Log Message:
fix comment
Index: body.wmi
===
RCS file: /cvs/debian-openoffice/op
Update of /cvs/debian-openoffice/openoffice.debian.net
In directory gluck:/tmp/cvs-serv7873
Modified Files:
patches.wml
Log Message:
s/openoffice/ooo-build/
Index: patches.wml
===
RCS file: /cvs/debian-openoffice/openoffice.
Update of /cvs/debian-openoffice/openoffice.debian.net/WML/INCLUDES
In directory gluck:/tmp/cvs-serv19043/WML/INCLUDES
Modified Files:
body.wmi
Log Message:
add MST to make dates/times more clear
Index: body.wmi
===
RCS file
Update of /cvs/debian-openoffice/oo-debian-files/doc
In directory gluck:/tmp/cvs-serv11515/doc
Modified Files:
TODO
Log Message:
minor TODO update
Index: TODO
===
RCS file: /cvs/debian-openoffice/oo-debian-files/doc/TODO,v
r
Update of /cvs/debian-openoffice/oo-debian-files/debian
In directory gluck:/tmp/cvs-serv11515/debian
Modified Files:
changelog
Log Message:
minor TODO update
Index: changelog
===
RCS file: /cvs/debian-openoffice/oo-debian-fi
Hi,
Rene Engelhard wrote:
> Anyway, I will look whether I can find some time at this weekend to
> update the page...
I just did a quick update...
Grüße/Regards,
René
--
.''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer
: :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/
`. `'
[CC:ing debain-openoffice, may be interessant for others, too ]
Hi,
Alex Perry wrote:
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-openoffice/2004/07/msg00216.html
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-openoffice/2004/07/msg00227.html
>
> This exchange was six months ago, and I can't find anything more recent
>
Hi,
Bruce Byfield wrote:
> If possible, I'd like to get a quote about how Debian plans to respond.
> By putting together a Java-free package? By using a free implementation
This is what we currently do for 1.1.x.
> of Java? By some other means? Since Debian is a distribution that is
That's w
Hi,
David A. Cobb wrote:
>I guess I need to start with, "Is anyone here awake?" I see that
No, the question here is where you were the last months. If you would have
been here (or using Debian sarge/sid) you would have seen that there were
regular openoffice.org updates for sarge and sid an
On Fri, 2005-03-04 at 19:50 -0500, David A. Cobb wrote:
> Bruce Byfield wrote:
>
> > Hi:
> >
> > I'm working on an article about the decision to use Java in
> > OpenOffice.org. The article will include both positive and negative
> > opinions, and talk about how it affects repackagers of OOo, and h
18 matches
Mail list logo
