Processed: try #2

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 294105 + fixed-upstream Bug#294105: openoffice.org-bin: why OOo depends on libstlport ? There were no tags set. Tags added: fixed-upstream > retitle 294105 [fixed for 2.0] openoffice.org-bin: why OOo depends on > libstlport ? Bug#294105: openoffic

Bug#294105: openoffice.org-bin: why OOo depends on libstlport ?

tag 294105 + fixed-upstrem retitle [fixed for 2.0] openoffice.org-bin: why OOo depends on libstlport ? thanks [ please wrap your lines after 70/72 chars. thanks ] Hi, Benoît Dejean wrote: > Package: openoffice.org-bin > Version: 1.1.3-4 > Severity: wishlist > > Hi, i'd like to know why OpenOffi

Processed: Re: Bug#294105: openoffice.org-bin: why OOo depends on libstlport ?

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 294105 + fixed-upstrem Unknown tag/s: fixed-upstrem. Recognized are: patch wontfix moreinfo unreproducible fixed potato woody sid help security upstream pending sarge sarge-ignore experimental d-i confirmed ipv6 lfs fixed-in-experimental fixed-ups

Bug#293176: Setting system wide defaults.

Any particular place? I'm not familiar with debian rules but /usr/lib/openoffice/share is a really bad place as you should be able mount /usr ro also it just seems wrong ;-) How about be real convoluted and link the cache into var :) John Rene Engelhard wrote: Hi, John McMonagle wrote: Crea

Bug#293176: Setting system wide defaults.

Hi, Rene Engelhard wrote: > If, then /var. /var looks better suited for that. Since uno_packages is > not only configuration but also external packages. And especially since it contains variable data as a cache... Grüße/Regards, René -- .''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer : :

Bug#294105: openoffice.org-bin: why OOo depends on libstlport ?

Package: openoffice.org-bin Version: 1.1.3-4 Severity: wishlist Hi, i'd like to know why OpenOffice.org depends on libstlport4.6 ? OOo seems to be the only software in Debian to depends on this C++ library, where every other C++ apps uses libstdc++. Building/running OOo against libstdc++ would

Bug#293176: Setting system wide defaults.

Hi, John McMonagle wrote: > Created /etc/openoffice/uno_packages > Linked to/etc/openoffice/uno_packages into > /usr/lib/openoffice/share > copied zip into /etc/openoffice/uno_packages > ran /usr/lib/openoffice/program/pkgchkhk -s uno_packages should be in /var if outside /usr/lib/openo

Bug#286592: Same problem here

Hi, I recently upgraded and have the same problem (at least according to the description). The trace looks pretty much the same: sh: crash_report: command not found Fatal exception: Signal 11 Stack: /usr/lib/openoffice/program/libsal.so.3[0xb72df3e8] /usr/lib/openoffice/program/libsal.so.3[0xb72

Bug#293176: Setting system wide defaults.

Made a lot of progress. Here is what I tried: Made a fresh user install. Did customizations as that user. Even added a clip art and template. Zipped up user/ I did exclude a couple things but did most everything. Created /etc/openoffice/uno_packages Linked to/etc/openoffice/uno_packages i

Processed: changing email addresses on my reported bugs

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > submitter 236852 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug#236852: evolution-wombat consumes 100% CPU when editing Appointment with Meeting information Changed Bug submitter from David Everly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > submitter 268637 [EMAIL PROTECTED] B

Re: Bug#288683: openoffice not offered for handling .doc files in evolution

I still got the probb with the .doc and all other applications in Evolution since i did the upgrade to 2.0.3 I got the right syntax in ooo645writer.desktop and in the magic.mime/vnd.ms-word.xml files. osdio:/home/anders# dpkg -l |grep evolu ii evolution 2.0.3-1.2 The groupware suite