Bug#289800: openoffice.org: autosave is not enabled by default?!?!?!?!?!?!

On Tue, 2005-01-11 at 16:59 +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote: > severity 289800 wishlist > retitle 289800 openoffice.org: please enable autosave per default > thanks > > Lee Revell wrote: > > Package: openoffice.org > > Version: 1.1.3-4 > > Severity: critical > > Justification: causes serious data loss

Bug#289793: acknowledged by developer (Re: Bug#289793: openoffice.org-debian-files: cannot launch oowriter et al. due to missing setup.bin, soffice.bin)

> Your openoffice.org-bin package installation is corrupted. Be it by the > fs or some other means. Those files *are* normally there. It looks like somehow my openoffice.org-bin deb was corrupted. I removed and redownloaded it, then forced a reinstall. It works now. Thanks. -Sean -- To UNSU

Bug#289715: Same already fixed bugs are back rendering Impress almost unusable

Rene Engelhard wrote: well, it is up to date sid with no special packages I just have gcc-3.4 as unsual things... 2.6.10. With NPTL and TLS (i.e. libc6-i686 installed). Well I have exactly this config on my laptop. My desktop is an athlon so no libc6-i686 but the bug is still there also. Read

Bug#289715: Same already fixed bugs are back rendering Impress almost unusable

Hi again, Am Dienstag, 11. Januar 2005 11:51 schrieben Sie: > 2.6.10. Erm. Blah. I should've slept more. 2.6.10 is my sarge laptop. My sid desktop is 2.6.8-1-k7. Regards, Rene -- .''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer : :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene

Bug#289715: Same already fixed bugs are back rendering Impress almost unusable

Hi, Am Dienstag, 11. Januar 2005 11:22 schrieb Eric Valette: > Eric Valette wrote: > > Eric Valette wrote: > >> 2) or the bug is not in the binaries themselves but in the > >> environment. I will try to see if it also occurs like the previous > >> time on my laptop as well. But I'm rather conf

Bug#284096: Bug#289715: Same already fixed bugs are back rendering Impress almost unusable

Eric Valette wrote: Eric Valette wrote: Eric Valette wrote: 2) or the bug is not in the binaries themselves but in the environment. I will try to see if it also occurs like the previous time on my laptop as well. But I'm rather confident. Updated my laptop with sid of today (97.2 Mb!). Reboo

Bug#289715: Same already fixed bugs are back rendering Impress almost unusable

Eric Valette wrote: Eric Valette wrote: 2) or the bug is not in the binaries themselves but in the environment. I will try to see if it also occurs like the previous time on my laptop as well. But I'm rather confident. Updated my laptop with sid of today (97.2 Mb!). Rebooted to be sure. Then

Bug#289715: Same already fixed bugs are back rendering Impress almost unusable

Eric Valette wrote: 2) or the bug is not in the binaries themselves but in the environment. I will try to see if it also occurs like the previous time on my laptop as well. But I'm rather confident. Updated my laptop with sid of today (97.2 Mb!). Rebooted to be sure. Then tested : the exact t

Bug#289715: Same already fixed bugs are back rendering Impress almost unusable

Rene Engelhard wrote: What about trying to help us (our time ressources are really limited - remember: volunteers in spare time...) if you have that much knowledge (also referring to The C++ part below I snipped in this reply..)? This also would result in the bug probably be fixed quickly. As you a

Bug#289715: Same already fixed bugs are back rendering Impress almost unusable

Hi, Eric Valette wrote: > Rene Engelhard wrote: > >Hi, > > > >Eric Valette wrote: > > > >>Well done guys. Could you backup your erroneous patches once again... > >> > >> > >>

Bug#289793: marked as done (openoffice.org-debian-files: cannot launch oowriter et al. due to missing setup.bin, soffice.bin)

Your message dated Tue, 11 Jan 2005 17:03:26 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#289793: openoffice.org-debian-files: cannot launch oowriter et al. due to missing setup.bin, soffice.bin has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim t

Bug#289800: openoffice.org: autosave is not enabled by default?!?!?!?!?!?!

severity 289800 wishlist retitle 289800 openoffice.org: please enable autosave per default thanks Lee Revell wrote: > Package: openoffice.org > Version: 1.1.3-4 > Severity: critical > Justification: causes serious data loss No, this is *not* critical. > I was SHOCKED and ENRAGED to find that Ope

Processed: Re: Bug#289800: openoffice.org: autosave is not enabled by default?!?!?!?!?!?!

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 289800 wishlist Bug#289800: openoffice.org: autosave is not enabled by default?!?!?!?!?!?! Severity set to `wishlist'. > retitle 289800 openoffice.org: please enable autosave per default Bug#289800: openoffice.org: autosave is not enabled by d