Rene Engelhard wrote:
> Josh Triplett wrote:
>>I think the ideal solution would be to change hspell so that it can
>>build outside of the OO.o source tree; as far as I know, it is OK to
>>have some GPLed and some non-free plugins for the same LGPLed program,
>>as long as they are not all distribute
Hi,
thanks a lot for oo-java package. I have installed it yesterday on my
otherwise rather clean debian/sarge and it seems to work just perfectly.
Just curious, whether it will make into stable sarge.
Thanks for any reply,
Matej
--
Matej Cepl, http://www.ceplovi.cz/matej
GPG Finger: 89EF 4BC
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reopen 265148
Bug#265148: openoffice.org: Cannot print with CUPS
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
> reopen 254239
Bug#254239: openoffice.org: cups printer device options missing
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
> reopen 260007
Bug#260007: op
I tried the 1.1.2-5 incarnation tonight : color selection works as expected.
Thanks for the good work.
-- eric
Your message dated Wed, 06 Oct 2004 16:34:42 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#274896: fixed in openoffice.org 1.1.2-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Wed, 06 Oct 2004 16:34:42 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#273335: fixed in openoffice.org 1.1.2-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Wed, 06 Oct 2004 16:34:42 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#273335: fixed in openoffice.org 1.1.2-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Wed, 06 Oct 2004 16:34:42 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#272710: fixed in openoffice.org 1.1.2-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the
override file for the following file(s):
openoffice.org-mimelnk_1.1.2-5_all.deb: package says section is kde, override
says editors.
Either the package or the override file is incorrect. If you think
the override is correct and
Accepted:
openoffice.org-bin_1.1.2-5_i386.deb
to pool/main/o/openoffice.org/openoffice.org-bin_1.1.2-5_i386.deb
openoffice.org-l10n-af_1.1.2-5_all.deb
to pool/main/o/openoffice.org/openoffice.org-l10n-af_1.1.2-5_all.deb
openoffice.org-l10n-ar_1.1.2-5_all.deb
to pool/main/o/openoffice.org/ope
Your message dated Wed, 06 Oct 2004 16:34:42 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#273850: fixed in openoffice.org 1.1.2-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Wed, 06 Oct 2004 16:34:42 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#273298: fixed in openoffice.org 1.1.2-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
openoffice.org_1.1.2-5_source+all+i386.changes uploaded successfully to
localhost
along with the files:
ttf-opensymbol_1.1.2-5_all.deb
openoffice.org-mimelnk_1.1.2-5_all.deb
openoffice.org-l10n-zh-tw_1.1.2-5_all.deb
openoffice.org-l10n-cy_1.1.2-5_all.deb
openoffice.org-l10n-ar_1.1.2-5_al
Probably you are the uploader of the following file(s) in
the Debian upload queue directory:
openoffice.org_1.1.2-5.diff.gz
openoffice.org_1.1.2-5.dsc
openoffice.org_1.1.2-5_all.deb
This looks like an upload, but a .changes file is missing, so the job
cannot be processed.
If no .changes file
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi again, sent the mail too fast,
Rene Engelhard wrote:
> I know at least of one bug in this branch where we have double depends on
> the -bin, one time through the .shlibs (probably too lax with 1.1.0-2 anyway
> but I once wrote that just as a workin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
and again
Rene Engelhard wrote:
> Rene Engelhard wrote:
> > I know at least of one bug in this branch where we have double depends on
> > the -bin, one time through the .shlibs (probably too lax with 1.1.0-2 anyway
> > but I once wrote that j
Hi Scott,
Chris Halls wrote:
> On Wed, 2004-10-06 at 00:36, Scott Thatcher wrote:
> > Hello! I'm writing with a question as to whether it's too late to get
> > OpenOffice 1.1.3 into Sarge.
>
> I'd love to be able to say yes, but I don't think there is much chance
> of this happening. To do thi
Hi,
Luk Claes wrote:
> Hi Rene (we have met at LT, remember?)
yes.
> No problem, it looks quite all right.
OK. Is in 1.1.2-5.
Grüße/Regards,
René
--
.''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer
: :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/
`. `' [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Chris Halls wrote:
Hi Matt,
On Fri, 2004-09-24 at 03:08, Matt Price wrote:
There was a recent thread on dev@installation.openoffice.org:
From:
Clemmitt M. Sigler
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To:
dev@installation.openoffice.org
To:
dev@installation.openoffice.org
Hi,
Josh Triplett wrote:
> I think the ideal solution would be to change hspell so that it can
> build outside of the OO.o source tree; as far as I know, it is OK to
> have some GPLed and some non-free plugins for the same LGPLed program,
> as long as they are not all distributed together.
The hs
Hi Scott,
On Wed, 2004-10-06 at 00:36, Scott Thatcher wrote:
> Hello! I'm writing with a question as to whether it's too late to get
> OpenOffice 1.1.3 into Sarge.
I'd love to be able to say yes, but I don't think there is much chance
of this happening. To do this it would need someone to have
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Rene Engelhard wrote:
| Hi,
Hi Rene (we have met at LT, remember?)
| Luk Claes wrote:
|
|>Please find attached the Dutch po-debconf translation. This translation
|>has been vetted by the review process of the debian-l10n-dutch team.
|>Please add it
22 matches
Mail list logo
