Package: openoffice.org
Version: 1.0.1-6
Severity: normal
Hi!
Just tried out openoffice.org with simply issung command
"apt-get install openoffice.org".
After apt-get I tried to start oo with command ooffice,
and I got this in my xterm:
SIOCGIFADDR got '00:00:00:00:00:00'
sh: line 1: /usr/sbin/l
Accepted:
openoffice.org-debian-files_1.0.1-6+3.dsc
to
pool/contrib/o/openoffice.org-debian-files/openoffice.org-debian-files_1.0.1-6+3.dsc
openoffice.org-debian-files_1.0.1-6+3.tar.gz
to
pool/contrib/o/openoffice.org-debian-files/openoffice.org-debian-files_1.0.1-6+3.tar.gz
openoffice.org-d
Your message dated Sun, 01 Dec 2002 14:48:08 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#171345: fixed in openoffice.org-debian-files 1.0.1-6+2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not
Repository: oo-debian-files/debian
who:rene
time: Sun Dec 1 19:59:44 UTC 2002
Log Message:
*shit* Why has this happened???
DO not install spadmin twice
Files:
changed:changelog rules
Accepted:
openoffice.org-debian-files_1.0.1-6+2.dsc
to
pool/contrib/o/openoffice.org-debian-files/openoffice.org-debian-files_1.0.1-6+2.dsc
openoffice.org-debian-files_1.0.1-6+2.tar.gz
to
pool/contrib/o/openoffice.org-debian-files/openoffice.org-debian-files_1.0.1-6+2.tar.gz
openoffice.org-d
Repository: oo-debian-files/debian
who:rene
time: Sun Dec 1 19:30:23 UTC 2002
Log Message:
fix or override all lintian warnings/errors except one (no manpage for
regcomp).
Files:
changed:copyright dirs rules
added: overrides
tag 171345 - moreinfo
tag 171345 + pending
thanks
Hi Martin,
martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Rene Engelhard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.12.01.1830 +0100]:
> > 1.0.1-5 did contain it and therefore openoffice.org-debian-files has
> > "Conflicts: openoffice.org (<= 1.0.1-5).
>
> 1.0.1-5+woody.2,
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 171345 - moreinfo
Bug#171345: openoffice.org-debian-files: overwriting a file
Tags were: moreinfo
Tags removed: moreinfo
> tag 171345 + pending
Bug#171345: openoffice.org-debian-files: overwriting a file
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
Repository: oo-debian-files/debian
who:rene
time: Sun Dec 1 18:09:27 UTC 2002
Log Message:
<< instead of <
Files:
changed:control
On Sunday 01 Dec 2002 4:17 pm, Kevin B. Hendricks wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > For some reason i had changed that line to "DICT en US en_GB"
>
> In the future, please tell people you have hacked and played around with
> installing other dictionaries. That would have been a helpful piece of
> information to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sunday 01 Dec 2002 4:19 pm, you wrote:
> > seems to suggest much better alternatives than openoffice's built in
> > spellchecker.
>
> Specific examples please
A bit tough there, its one of those 'general feeling' things and i just seem
general
Repository: oo-debian-files/manpages
who:rene
time: Sun Dec 1 17:55:39 UTC 2002
Log Message:
- add simple regcomp wrapper script
- add OOo's command line options to manpage (thanks Wouter van Heyst)
- fix Conflicts:
Files:
changed:openoffice.1
Repository: oo-debian-files/debian
who:rene
time: Sun Dec 1 17:55:38 UTC 2002
Log Message:
- add simple regcomp wrapper script
- add OOo's command line options to manpage (thanks Wouter van Heyst)
- fix Conflicts:
Files:
changed:changelog control rules
Repository: oo-debian-files/bin
who:rene
time: Sun Dec 1 17:55:38 UTC 2002
Log Message:
- add simple regcomp wrapper script
- add OOo's command line options to manpage (thanks Wouter van Heyst)
- fix Conflicts:
Files:
added: regcomp
tag 171345 + moreinfo
thanks
Hi Martin,
martin f krafft wrote:
> Package: openoffice.org-debian-files
> Version: 1.0.1-6+1
> Severity: serious
> Justification: Policy 11.7.3
>
> Unpacking openoffice.org-debian-files (from
> .../openoffice.org-debian-files_1.0.1-6+1_all.deb) ...
> dpkg: error pr
also sprach Rene Engelhard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.12.01.1830 +0100]:
> 1.0.1-5 did contain it and therefore openoffice.org-debian-files has
> "Conflicts: openoffice.org (<= 1.0.1-5).
1.0.1-5+woody.2, which is > 1.0.1-5, thus.
I suggest conflicts on < 1.0.1-6
--
.''`. martin f. krafft <[
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 171345 + moreinfo
Bug#171345: openoffice.org-debian-files: overwriting a file
There were no tags set.
Tags added: moreinfo
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(admi
Package: openoffice.org-debian-files
Version: 1.0.1-6+1
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 11.7.3
Unpacking openoffice.org-debian-files (from
.../openoffice.org-debian-files_1.0.1-6+1_all.deb) ...
dpkg: error processing
/var/cache/apt/archives/openoffice.org-debian-files_1.0.1-6+1_all.deb
Hi,
> using aspell
> seems to suggest much better alternatives than openoffice's built in
> spellchecker.
BTW, I looked at the en_GB.aff file and they do *not* use the replacement
table feature of MySpell. So their suggestions mechanism will ONLY catch
common typing problems (additional letter
Hi,
> On a side note, it it possible to make openoffice
> use aspell rather than its built in one as kmail/kword using aspell
No, aspell is not crossplatform enough but Kevin Atkinbson is trying to
make it better. He would welcome the any development help you might
offer.
> seems to suggest mu
Hi,
> For some reason i had changed that line to "DICT en US en_GB"
In the future, please tell people you have hacked and played around with
installing other dictionaries. That would have been a helpful piece of
information to post in the bug report don't you think.
> it must have been a
Hi Kevin,
Kevin B. Hendricks wrote:
> Yes, here are a few other things to check.
>
> 1. are there any old or extra en_US peices found in the user's own
> spellcheck directory (upstream look in
> ~/OpenOffice.org1.0.1/user/wordbook
> That directory should now be empty.
Tom? Have you something
Hi.
This reply accidentially went only to Kevin. Fowarding to
debian-openoffice
Rene
- Forwarded message from Rene Engelhard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
Date: Sun, 1 Dec 2002 17:12:30 +0100
From: Rene Engelhard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Kevin B. Hendricks" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Spel
It is now fixed, i was missing the .aff file for en_GB
Thanks for help guys. On a side note, it it possible to make openoffice use
aspell rather than its built in one as kmail/kword using aspell seems to
suggest much better alternatives than openoffice's built in spellchecker.
Tom
On Sunday 01 Dec 2002 3:45 pm, Kevin B. Hendricks wrote:
> Hi,
>
> No the problem is not upstream. Spellchecking works fine upstream.
> So something about the debain installation is not correct (it seems to be
> missing the affix information).
>
> Please check for the files en_US.aff and en_US.dic
Hi,
Here are some more things to check:
3. are en_US.aff and en_US.dic world readable?
4. do the share/dict/ooo directories have execute privs enabled
5. As A test, you could simply remove the en_US.* files and manully place
known good copies (use the dictionary installer available from the
Hi,
Yes, here are a few other things to check.
1. are there any old or extra en_US peices found in the user's own
spellcheck directory (upstream look in
~/OpenOffice.org1.0.1/user/wordbook
That directory should now be empty.
2. Corruption of the en_US.aff file. Please zip up those files and
Hi Kevin,
Kevin B. Hendricks wrote:
> No the problem is not upstream. Spellchecking works fine upstream.
> So something about the debain installation is not correct (it seems to be
> missing the affix information).
>
> Please check for the files en_US.aff and en_US.dic being present in your
>
Hi,
No the problem is not upstream. Spellchecking works fine upstream.
So something about the debain installation is not correct (it seems to be
missing the affix information).
Please check for the files en_US.aff and en_US.dic being present in your
tree in the proper place (under an official
Hi,
Jan-Hendrik Palic:
> http://bourbaki.math.uni-kiel.de/~jpalic/OpenOffice.org (not
> apt-getable).
>
> Do you have the problem then too?
>
Yes. I'll mail the file to you privately.
--
Matthias Urlichs | noris network AG | http://smurf.noris.de/
pgpvBqPgNgH4D.pgp
Descriptio
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ive had this problem for a while with the debian packages, but as it is still
in the latest version (upgraded yesterday) i thought i would report it. The
spell check (en_us or manually installed en_gb) is basically useless as it
cant recognise any p
Hi,
attached is another patch that makes also nas to compile with gcc-3.2.
Gerhard--- oo_1.0.1_src/nas/makefile.mk.bak2002-12-01 10:45:45.0 +0100
+++ oo_1.0.1_src/nas/makefile.mk2002-12-01 10:45:19.0 +0100
@@ -77,10 +77,10 @@
.IF "$(GUI)"=="UNX"
#relative to CONFIGU
On Sunday 01 December 2002 00:55, Jan-Hendrik Palic wrote:
> Hi ..
>
> I tried to build OOo with explicity exporting of CC/CXX to see, if libs
> like freetype/libdb/libz etc etc are build with gcc-3.2/g++-3.2, too.
> As Gerhard mentioned, the problem of the relocation error might be the
> usage of
33 matches
Mail list logo
