Your message dated Wed, 27 Nov 2002 20:59:46 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#163407: fixed in openoffice.org-debian-files 1.0.1-6+1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not
Your message dated Wed, 27 Nov 2002 20:58:53 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#162984: fixed in openoffice.org 1.0.1-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Wed, 27 Nov 2002 20:59:46 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#161970: fixed in openoffice.org-debian-files 1.0.1-6+1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not
Your message dated Wed, 27 Nov 2002 20:58:52 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#156044: fixed in openoffice.org 1.0.1-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Wed, 27 Nov 2002 20:58:52 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#162240: fixed in openoffice.org 1.0.1-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Wed, 27 Nov 2002 20:58:53 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#165036: fixed in openoffice.org 1.0.1-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Wed, 27 Nov 2002 20:58:52 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#162428: fixed in openoffice.org 1.0.1-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Wed, 27 Nov 2002 20:59:47 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#167336: fixed in openoffice.org-debian-files 1.0.1-6+1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not
Your message dated Wed, 27 Nov 2002 20:59:47 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#168820: fixed in openoffice.org-debian-files 1.0.1-6+1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not
Accepted:
openoffice.org-spellcheck-de-at_20020701-2_all.deb
to
pool/contrib/o/openoffice.org-spellcheck-de/openoffice.org-spellcheck-de-at_20020701-2_all.deb
openoffice.org-spellcheck-de-ch_20020701-2_all.deb
to
pool/contrib/o/openoffice.org-spellcheck-de/openoffice.org-spellcheck-de-ch_200
Accepted:
openoffice.org-debian-files_1.0.1-6+1.dsc
to
pool/contrib/o/openoffice.org-debian-files/openoffice.org-debian-files_1.0.1-6+1.dsc
openoffice.org-debian-files_1.0.1-6+1.tar.gz
to
pool/contrib/o/openoffice.org-debian-files/openoffice.org-debian-files_1.0.1-6+1.tar.gz
openoffice.org-d
Accepted:
openoffice.org-bin_1.0.1-6_powerpc.deb
to pool/contrib/o/openoffice.org/openoffice.org-bin_1.0.1-6_powerpc.deb
Thank you for your contribution to Debian.
Accepted:
openoffice.org-bin_1.0.1-6_i386.deb
to pool/contrib/o/openoffice.org/openoffice.org-bin_1.0.1-6_i386.deb
openoffice.org-help-en_1.0.1-6_all.deb
to pool/contrib/o/openoffice.org/openoffice.org-help-en_1.0.1-6_all.deb
openoffice.org-l10n-ar_1.0.1-6_all.deb
to pool/contrib/o/openoffic
The changelog of package OpenOffice.org (1.0.1-5.6rc1) says:
* Add pre/post-install/rm hooks into openoffice.org-debian-files
I fetched the sources of openoffice.org-debian-files but couldn't find where
or how the hooks are invoked. Which one is missing something, me or the
package?-)
- Jarn
Hello list
> [This info came from a posting by Mathias Bauer to thei OOo discuss mailing
> list]
Was an answer for me ... anyway, a trick if you don't want OOo close after
macro execution : you must open a document with parameter (private:... don't
remind the follow I haven't here, if you want i
On Wednesday 27 November 2002 10:38, Chris Halls wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 27, 2002 at 07:38:49AM +0100, Gerhard Tonn wrote:
> > >It would be easier, if we know, that you are responsable for
> > >OpenOffice.org on Debian S390 ...
> > >Chris was afraid, that we are not able to support this port very w
Package: openoffice.org
Version: 1.0.1-5.6rc1
Severity: wishlist
The pt_BR version of OO is available:
http://www.openoffice.org.br/openoffice/stable/1.0.1/OOo_1.0.1_source.tar.gz
but unfortunately not yet packaged for Debian
Thanks
Michel.
-- System Information
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Hi Chris
On Wed, Nov 27, 2002 at 10:38:18AM +0100, Chris Halls wrote:
>On Wed, Nov 27, 2002 at 07:38:49AM +0100, Gerhard Tonn wrote:
>> >It would be easier, if we know, that you are responsable for
>> >OpenOffice.org on Debian S390 ...
>> >Chris was afraid, that we are not able to support this po
On Wed, Nov 27, 2002 at 12:44:26AM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> Anyway, to resolve these occuring problems it would help to add/remove
> /usr/lib/openoffice/program to /etc/ld.so.conf and run ldconfig during
> post{inst,rm}.
Eeh, the reason for keeping all these libs off the system path is that
On Wed, Nov 27, 2002 at 07:38:49AM +0100, Gerhard Tonn wrote:
> >It would be easier, if we know, that you are responsable for
> >OpenOffice.org on Debian S390 ...
> >Chris was afraid, that we are not able to support this port very well.
>
> In case you don't know, I am a Debian developer and I am
Hmm. Maybe someone in this list knows the answer to the following...
Is thare ANY way to access currently selected text in openoffice writer
document from a macro?
I failed to find a solution for this on api.openoffice.org ...
>Hi ..
>On Tue, Nov 26, 2002 at 07:56:05PM +0100, Gerhard Tonn wrote:
>>Are you interested to integrate the s390 patches in the debian package as
>>long as they are not available upstream?
>I hope, I will get them applied ;)
I will update the patches within the next days and let you know.
>It
22 matches
Mail list logo
