Hello,
On Mon, Aug 12, 2002 at 10:09:01AM +0200, Chris Halls wrote:
> We are currently working on producing packages compiled with gcc 3.2, which
> is due to be released in the near future. I have been given advice on
> debian-gcc about a problem, thanks to Martin v. Loewis.
>
> Thanks to Anthon
On Tue, Sep 03, 2002 at 08:06:50PM +0200, Jan-Hendrik Palic wrote:
> But Chris finished building OpenOffice.org for Woody and I think, he
> will announce them in the next time after testing (for i 386).
Yup, they are there now.
I pointed 'testing' to them too, because everyone seems to want to be
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday 03 September 2002 18:20, Alex Perry wrote:
> Confused ... With a standard 'testing' sources.list, the dependency
> version
> on libgcc1 is not available and so openoffice.org cannot be installed.
> Is the testing directory of debs currently
Hi ..
On Tue, Sep 03, 2002 at 06:56:43PM +0200, Jerome Warnier wrote:
>I got the hands on a P4 1.8GHz running Woody.
>I would like to help.
>How can I compile it as best as possible?
>Any instructions to get it to work asap?
>
>Should not take long to compile it on this machine.
All you need is
Hi ..
On Tue, Sep 03, 2002 at 06:51:48PM +0200, Jan Camenisch wrote:
>it seems that openoffice.org-bin_1.0.0-5_i386.deb
>is not installable on woody anymore (see below).
>The reason seems to be that it is build for testing
>and not for woody...
>Are there any plans to provide packages for
>woo
Confused ... With a standard 'testing' sources.list, the dependency
version
on libgcc1 is not available and so openoffice.org cannot be installed.
Is the testing directory of debs currently unusable, or what am I
missing ?
Jan-Hendrik Palic wrote:
Hi ..
On Sun, Sep 01, 2002 at 04:42:44AM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
Does it make sence to build OOo with newer gcc/glibc/binutils etc etc on
woody or should I only use the woody packages and the newer needed
debhelper?
I would try to do the second, if tha
Hej,
it seems that openoffice.org-bin_1.0.0-5_i386.deb
is not installable on woody anymore (see below).
The reason seems to be that it is build for testing
and not for woody...
Are there any plans to provide packages for
woody again?
Thanks,
Jan
% apt-get install openoffice.org-bin
Read
Hi ..
On Mon, Sep 02, 2002 at 10:54:09AM +0200, Jan-Hendrik Palic wrote:
>>>Speaking of mirroring, what is the status of the gcc 3.2 rebuilds
>>> of OpenOffice.org 1.0.1? I am rather confused by the state of things
>>> as seen from...
>>>
>>> http://ftp.freenet.de/pub/ftp.vpn-junkies.de/open
9 matches
Mail list logo