cvs commit to oo-deb/debian/scripts by gromitt

2002-09-02 Thread Debian Openoffice CVS
Repository: oo-deb/debian/scripts who:gromitt time: Mon Sep 2 23:24:25 UTC 2002 Log Message: Killed the additional dependencies in debian/script/vars.$ARCH and dropped doubled dependencies in debian/control.in Files: changed:vars.i386 vars.powerpc

cvs commit to oo-deb/debian by gromitt

2002-09-02 Thread Debian Openoffice CVS
Repository: oo-deb/debian who:gromitt time: Mon Sep 2 23:24:24 UTC 2002 Log Message: Killed the additional dependencies in debian/script/vars.$ARCH and dropped doubled dependencies in debian/control.in Files: changed:control.in

Re: oo vs gcc 3.2

2002-09-02 Thread Jan-Hendrik Palic
Hi Jack . On Mon, Sep 02, 2002 at 12:41:36AM -0400, Jack Howarth wrote: >Jan, > Speaking of mirroring, what is the status of the gcc 3.2 rebuilds >of OpenOffice.org 1.0.1? I am rather confused by the state of things >as seen from... > >http://ftp.freenet.de/pub/ftp.vpn-junkies.de/openoffice/poo

Re: Problem with upgrading OpenOffice

2002-09-02 Thread Paul Cupis
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Monday 02 September 2002 10:48, John Lewis wrote: > Sorry, but the following packages have unmet dependencies: > openoffice.org-bin: Depends: libgcc1 (>= 1:3.2-0pre3) but > 1:3.1.1-0pre3 is to be installed > Depends: libstdc

Problem with upgrading OpenOffice

2002-09-02 Thread John Lewis
Following an apt-get update, upgrade sequence of commands the latest version of openoffice (1.0.1-5) was downloaded (from http://ftp.freenet.de testing/contrib Release) and partially installed with openoffice.org-bin being held back trying apt-get -u install openoffice.org-bin results in the fo

Re: oo vs gcc 3.2

2002-09-02 Thread Jan-Hendrik Palic
Hi .. On Mon, Sep 02, 2002 at 10:11:13AM +0200, Chris Halls wrote: >On Mon, Sep 02, 2002 at 12:41:36AM -0400, Jack Howarth wrote: >> Jan, >>Speaking of mirroring, what is the status of the gcc 3.2 rebuilds >> of OpenOffice.org 1.0.1? I am rather confused by the state of things >> as seen from

Re: oo vs gcc 3.2

2002-09-02 Thread Chris Halls
On Mon, Sep 02, 2002 at 12:41:36AM -0400, Jack Howarth wrote: > Jan, >Speaking of mirroring, what is the status of the gcc 3.2 rebuilds > of OpenOffice.org 1.0.1? I am rather confused by the state of things > as seen from... > > http://ftp.freenet.de/pub/ftp.vpn-junkies.de/openoffice/pool/main

Re: Locales names in OOo

2002-09-02 Thread Chris Halls
Hi Jerome, On Mon, Sep 02, 2002 at 01:13:58AM +0200, Jerome Warnier wrote: > As you all know, the problem with OOo not keeping localization settings > is now clear (at least to me) :-) > It is due to OOo's strange handling of locales names. > I figured out that forcing a translation in /usr/bin/o

Re: oo vs gcc 3.2

2002-09-02 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi Jack, Jack Howarth wrote: > http://ftp.freenet.de/pub/ftp.vpn-junkies.de/openoffice/pool/main/stlport/ > http://ftp.freenet.de/pub/ftp.vpn-junkies.de/openoffice/pool/contrib/openoffice.org/ > > I see an openoffice.org 1.0.1-5 dsc which claims to Build-Depends g++-3.2 > yet I don't see a libstl