Re: [dev] Builds fails after 24h on PPC ....

2002-03-04 Thread Kevin B . Hendricks
Hi Jan, Apply this patch in sw/source/core/unocore to makefile.mk --- makefile.mk~Tue Nov 6 03:34:24 2001 +++ makefile.mk Fri Dec 7 12:13:51 2001 @@ -144,8 +144,14 @@ $(SLO)$/unotbl.obj \ $(SLO)$/unotext.obj -EXCEPTIONSNOOPTFILES = \ -$(SLO)$/unoportenum.obj +.IF "$

Re: [dev] Builds fails after 24h on PPC ....

2002-03-04 Thread Kevin B . Hendricks
Hi, That error message looked familiar. I looked back in the releases and [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing lists around November 20th to the 22nd of last year. So Yes this is because someone turned on NOOPT for everyone which prevented some things from coompiling properly. Here is my message about i

Builds fails after 24h on PPC ....

2002-03-04 Thread Jan-Hendrik Palic
Hi ... after 24h I got this on PPC: Making: ../unxlngppc.pro/lib/libsw641lp.so g++ -c -fPIC -o ../unxlngppc.pro/slo/sw_dflt_version.o -DUNX -I../unxlngppc.pro/inc /home/palic/Files/Projekte/OpenOffice/source/debian/openoffice-641c/build-tree/oo_641c_src/solenv/src/version.cxx gcc -shared -Wl,--ve

Re: Perhaps stupid request

2002-03-04 Thread Jan-Hendrik Palic
Hi ... On Mon, Mar 04, 2002 at 01:03:15PM +0100, Bernhard R. Link wrote: >* Rene Horn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020302 20:28]: >> I know, but you don't actually have a listing showing what builds (and how >> to >> build those things) and what doesn't. That's what I want. >The Problem is, that there

Re: mandrake source rpm

2002-03-04 Thread Jan-Hendrik Palic
Hi Nidd .. hi all ... On Mon, Mar 04, 2002 at 12:44:50PM +0300, Peter Novodvorsky wrote: >I found today that mandrake made an openoffice rpm that builds from >source, that is based my 638c packages. They missed to insert my >copyright, but I'm not angry with them. hmmm I mailed with one mandrake

unsubscribe

2002-03-04 Thread Johan Silen
-- Johan Silen, Geophysics Research, Finnish Meterological Institute Vuorikatu 15, P.O.Box 503, FIN-00101 HELSINKI, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED] (private) Phone: +358505423872,office: +358-9-19294661, fax:+358-9-19294603

Re: Compile report

2002-03-04 Thread asho
Bastian Kleineidam wrote: >Hi, > >here is a report on my build try with OpenOffice: > > >1) Build-Depends is missing tcsh >2) Build-Depends has libstlport4.0, which does not exist, I used > libstlport4.5. > So Build-Depends needs libstlport4.5, libstlport4.5-dev and > libstlport4.5-dbg. > >3

Re: Perhaps stupid request

2002-03-04 Thread Bernhard R. Link
* Rene Horn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020302 20:28]: > I know, but you don't actually have a listing showing what builds (and how to > build those things) and what doesn't. That's what I want. The Problem is, that there is currently only the one large build-script from the OpenOffice.org guys. This i

Fwd: Looking for sponsor

2002-03-04 Thread Bernhard R. Link
- Forwarded message from Stefan Schwandter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - From: Stefan Schwandter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sun, 3 Mar 2002 12:49:23 +0100 To: debian-mentors@lists.debian.org Subject: Looking for sponsor Resent-Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Resent-From: debian-mentors@lists.debian

mandrake source rpm

2002-03-04 Thread Peter Novodvorsky
Hello! I found today that mandrake made an openoffice rpm that builds from source, that is based my 638c packages. They missed to insert my copyright, but I'm not angry with them. I ask you to take a look at there patches: http://www.linux-mandrake.com/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/contrib-SPECS/openoffice