Re: Status of work on OpenOffice

Matthias Klose wrote: Jan-Hendrik Palic writes: The change from javac to gcj is the next problem. gcj will not be able to compile the javasource in openoffice, kaffe isn't it to. If anyone knows a solution, please tell us! would gcj from the HEAD branch (3.1) a solution? I was talking ab

Re: Status of work on OpenOffice

Jan-Hendrik Palic writes: > The change from javac to gcj is the next problem. gcj will not be able > to compile the javasource in openoffice, kaffe isn't it to. > If anyone knows a solution, please tell us! would gcj from the HEAD branch (3.1) a solution?

Status of work on OpenOffice

Hi all, the last days, we work hard on OpenOffice: Peter Novodvorsky ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) made a first package [1] of OpenOffice depending on OpenOffice 638c. Be carefull, it is one package but it is a beginning. Bastian Blank ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) was working on the support for gcc-3.0 in OpenOf