Synopsis: @protocol forward definitions do not work
State-Changed-From-To: open->closed
State-Changed-By: doko
State-Changed-When: Mon May 27 13:35:35 2002
State-Changed-Why:
fixed in the gcc-3.1 release
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&
>Submitter-Id: net
>Originator:Richard Braakman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Organization: The Debian Project
>Confidential: no
>Synopsis:
>Severity: non-critical
>Priority: low
>Category: java
>Class: ice-on-illegal-code
>Release: 3.1 (Debian) (Debian unstable)
>
>Submitter-Id: net
>Originator:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Organization: The Debian Project
>Confidential: no
>Synopsis:
>Severity: serious
>Priority: medium
>Category: target
>Class: ice-on-legal-code
>Release: 3.2.2 CVS 021212 (Debian) (Debian unstable)
>Environm
>Submitter-Id: net
>Originator:Bill Allombert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Organization: The Debian Project
>Confidential: no
>Synopsis:
>Severity: non-critical
>Priority: low
>Category: c
>Class: change-request
>Release: 3.2.1 (Debian) (Debian unstable)
>Environm
>Category: ada
>Synopsis: [3.3 branch regression] Ada bootstrap failure on powerpc-linux
>Confidential: no
>Severity: serious
>Priority: medium
>Class: sw-bug
>Submitter-Id: net
>Originator: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Release:gcc-3_3-branch 20021228
>Environ
>Category: ada
>Synopsis: [3.3 branch] Ada bootstrap failure on mipsel-linux
>Confidential: no
>Severity: critical
>Priority: medium
>Class: sw-bug
>Submitter-Id: net
>Originator: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Release:gcc-3_3-branch 20021228
>Environment:
mipse
>Category: bootstrap
>Synopsis: [3.3 branch regression] bootstrap failures on m68k-linux
>Confidential: no
>Severity: critical
>Priority: medium
>Class: sw-bug
>Submitter-Id: net
>Originator: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Release:gcc-3_3-branch CVS 20021228
>En
>Category: bootstrap
>Synopsis: [3.3 branch regression] bootstrap failures on arm-linux
>Confidential: no
>Severity: critical
>Priority: medium
>Class: sw-bug
>Submitter-Id: net
>Originator: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Release:gcc-3_3-branch 20021228
>Environ
Synopsis: [3.3 branch regression] Ada bootstrap failure on powerpc-linux
State-Changed-From-To: open->analyzed
State-Changed-By: doko
State-Changed-When: Tue Dec 31 03:03:09 2002
State-Changed-Why:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2002-12/msg01543.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?
Synopsis: [3.3 branch regression] Ada bootstrap failure on mipsel-linux
Responsible-Changed-From-To: unassigned->echristo
Responsible-Changed-By: doko
Responsible-Changed-When: Tue Dec 31 03:05:11 2002
Responsible-Changed-Why:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2002-12/msg01593.html
State-Changed-F
Synopsis: Improper warning when casting from pointer to non-const array to const
State-Changed-From-To: open->closed
State-Changed-By: doko
State-Changed-When: Sat Jan 11 03:16:55 2003
State-Changed-Why:
not a bug
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database
Synopsis: [3.3 branch regression] bootstrap failures on arm-linux
State-Changed-From-To: open->closed
State-Changed-By: doko
State-Changed-When: Tue Jan 21 19:16:50 2003
State-Changed-Why:
does bootstrap again. see:
http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?arch=arm&pkg=gcc-snapsho
LAST_UPDATED:
Native configuration is i386-pc-netbsdelf-gnu
=== g++ tests ===
Running target unix
=== g++ Summary ===
# of expected passes7357
# of expected failures 89
# of untested testcases 15
# of unsupported tests 3
/t
LAST_UPDATED: Fri Feb 21 16:24:42 UTC 2003
Native configuration is i386-pc-netbsdelf-gnu
=== g++ tests ===
Running target unix
=== g++ Summary ===
# of expected passes7360
# of expected failures 89
# of untested testcases 15
# of un
>Submitter-Id: net
>Originator:Matthias Klose
>Organization:
>Confidential: no
>Synopsis: [3.3 regression] libjava build error on arm-linux
>Severity: serious
>Priority: medium
>Category: target
>Class: rejects-legal
>Release: 3.3 20030301 (Debian prerelea
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37637
Matthias Klose changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||doko at debian dot org
--- Comment #2
--
doko at ubuntu dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||debian-gcc at lists dot
--- Comment #28 from doko at ubuntu dot com 2008-09-06 22:53 ---
so this bites again with trunk and ada. Jim, Steve, any news on this?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27880
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or
--
doko at ubuntu dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||debian-gcc at lists dot
--
doko at ubuntu dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||debian-gcc at lists dot
t_add_function_parameters (bootstrap
error)
Product: gcc
Version: 4.4.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: doko at
--
doko at ubuntu dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||debian-gcc at lists dot
--- Comment #3 from doko at ubuntu dot com 2008-10-14 07:21 ---
reverting r141077 on current trunk lets the bootstrap succeed on sparc-linux
--
doko at ubuntu dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
doko at ubuntu dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||debian-gcc at lists dot
--
doko at ubuntu dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||debian-gcc at lists dot
--- Comment #5 from doko at ubuntu dot com 2008-12-22 10:58 ---
no, same result.
btw, in the generated .ii file using -D__disable_PCH__ -save-temps, the
precompiled header is still referenced.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38593
--- You are receiving this
--- Comment #8 from doko at ubuntu dot com 2009-01-05 18:37 ---
Created an attachment (id=17034)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17034&action=view)
preprocessed source
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38593
--- You are receiving th
--
doko at ubuntu dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #16952|0 |1
is obsolete||
http://gcc.gnu.org
--
doko at ubuntu dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #16953|0 |1
is obsolete||
http://gcc.gnu.org
--
doko at ubuntu dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||debian-gcc at lists dot
--
doko at ubuntu dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||debian-gcc at lists dot
--- Comment #4 from doko at ubuntu dot com 2009-01-29 10:14 ---
when Ray wrote he tested with a snapshot build, I assume this was 20090107
without the patch applied, so the status on the trunk is not known yet. will
test with current trunk later.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla
--- Comment #10 from doko at ubuntu dot com 2009-01-29 22:36 ---
I'm able to reproduce it with trunk 20090129. The gsf-scan executable links
against the just built libgsf.so, so I assume we have to look for a miscompiled
file in libgsf.
--
doko at ubuntu dot com ch
--
doko at ubuntu dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||debian-gcc at lists dot
--- Comment #8 from doko at ubuntu dot com 2009-04-21 14:36 ---
- config/abi/pre/gnu.ver needs the __signbitl symbol mentioned as well.
- the patch has an empty #ifdef/#endif at the end
with this change the symbol is found in the library. checked with a native
build on hppa-linux
--- Comment #1 from doko at ubuntu dot com 2009-04-23 09:14 ---
turned out, that a wrong newlib build for spu was used. closing as invalid.
--
doko at ubuntu dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #6 from doko at debian dot org 2009-04-29 21:36 ---
Subject: Re: libstdc++ generates man pages, which conflict
with the linux manpages
bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org schrieb:
> --- Comment #1 from bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-27 22:35 ---
>
> Is
--- Comment #11 from doko at debian dot org 2009-05-13 16:28 ---
Subject: Re: [4.4/4.5 regression] symbols ce...@glibcxx_3.4.3
not exported
bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org schrieb:
> --- Comment #10 from bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-05-12 23:01 ---
>
> Sorry for
--- Comment #1 from doko at ubuntu dot com 2009-06-20 01:21 ---
The SH port does use a linker script to link with both -lgcc_s and -lgcc.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40134
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You reported the bug, or are watching
t gnu dot org
ReportedBy: doko at ubuntu dot com
GCC target triplet: s390-linux-gnu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45394
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to de
--
doko at ubuntu dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||4.6.0
Known to work||4.5.1
http
--- Comment #1 from doko at ubuntu dot com 2010-08-24 10:29 ---
seen as well with 20100824
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45394
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
--
To
--
doko at ubuntu dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||debian-gcc at lists dot
--- Comment #3 from doko at ubuntu dot com 2010-09-21 14:59 ---
https://buildd.debian.org/pkg.cgi?pkg=gcc-snapshot
yes, 20100918 still fails to build:
--
doko at ubuntu dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46486
Matthias Klose changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||debian-gcc at lists dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46479
Matthias Klose changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||debian-gcc at lists dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46958
--- Comment #1 from Matthias Klose 2010-12-18 17:00:55
UTC ---
same build failure on ia64-linux
--
Configure bugmail: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC lis
--
doko at ubuntu dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||debian-gcc at lists dot
--- Comment #3 from doko at ubuntu dot com 2009-10-14 17:24 ---
138206 2008-07-28 OK
2008-11-16 FAIL (gcc-snapshot build)
that looks consistent with my test builds; with the 2008-07-28 build the ld
testsuite passes without failures
--
http
--- Comment #4 from doko at ubuntu dot com 2009-10-14 21:21 ---
> A binary search through the gcc-4.4 snapshots has identified 4.4-20080822 as
> the last good(*) snapshot and 4.4-20080829 as the first bad one.
build in between fail for me with:
/opt/doko/gcc/139572/./gcc/xgcc
--- Comment #5 from doko at ubuntu dot com 2009-10-14 21:26 ---
looking at the interval there a three arm specific commits:
2008-08-23 Paolo Carlini
2008-08-23 Sebastian Redl
- r139509: exception propagation support
2008-08-26 Vladimir Makarov
- r139590: IRA merge
--
doko at ubuntu dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vmakarov at gcc dot gnu dot
--
doko at ubuntu dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||paolo dot carlini at oracle
--
doko at ubuntu dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pbrook at gcc dot gnu dot
--- Comment #5 from doko at ubuntu dot com 2009-12-08 12:36 ---
yes, re-testing with the version from the ML. currently passed the libstdc++
build.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42317
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for
--
doko at ubuntu dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||debian-gcc at lists dot
--
doko at ubuntu dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||debian-gcc at lists dot
--
doko at ubuntu dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||debian-gcc at lists dot
--
doko at ubuntu dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||debian-gcc at lists dot
--
doko at ubuntu dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||debian-gcc at lists dot
--- Comment #2 from doko at ubuntu dot com 2010-01-12 14:33 ---
this is fixed on the trunk, preparing a backport to the branch
--
doko at ubuntu dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
doko at ubuntu dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||debian-gcc at lists dot
--
doko at ubuntu dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||debian-gcc at lists dot
--
doko at ubuntu dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||debian-gcc at lists dot
Priority: P3
Component: other
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: doko at ubuntu dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42710
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching some
--- Comment #1 from doko at ubuntu dot com 2010-01-12 16:24 ---
Created an attachment (id=19560)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19560&action=view)
preprocessed source
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42710
--- You are receiving th
--- Comment #3 from doko at ubuntu dot com 2010-01-12 16:50 ---
configured with --enable-checking=release
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42707
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is
--
doko at ubuntu dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||debian-gcc at lists dot
--- Comment #4 from doko at ubuntu dot com 2010-01-12 23:04 ---
verified with binutils/gcc builds from 20100112 trunks
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42532
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter
e608) at ../../src/gcc/toplev.c:2447
#29 0x7616cabd in __libc_start_main () from /lib/libc.so.6
#30 0x0049f179 in _start ()
--
Summary: ICE on error recovery (segfault in build_over_call in
gcc/cp/call.c:5653
Product: gcc
Versi
--
doko at ubuntu dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||error-recovery, ice-on
--- Comment #1 from doko at ubuntu dot com 2010-01-13 13:17 ---
Created an attachment (id=19571)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19571&action=view)
preprocessed source
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42725
--- You are receiving th
--
doko at ubuntu dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||debian-gcc at lists dot
--- Comment #11 from doko at ubuntu dot com 2010-01-20 13:58 ---
the man pages still have problems with escape codes used (prefix backslashes);
I didn't build and run the check tool yet again.
Matthias
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42460
--- Yo
--- Comment #13 from doko at ubuntu dot com 2010-01-21 14:30 ---
std::basic_ios.3, std::basic_ofstream.3, std::basic_ostream.3,
std::basic_ostringstream.3, std::ios_base.3:
.PP
Definition at line 657 of file ios_base.h.
.SS "\fBstreamsize\fP std::ios_base::width () const\fC [i
--- Comment #7 from doko at ubuntu dot com 2010-02-15 15:32 ---
this seems to be the patch for the ARM unwind table linker processing? if yes,
see http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10695 for some comments.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40860
--- Comment #9 from doko at ubuntu dot com 2010-02-16 16:34 ---
confirmed with binutils trunk 20100216, checking with gold from the trunk.
--
doko at ubuntu dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
doko at ubuntu dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org|pbrook at gcc dot gnu dot
--- Comment #1 from doko at ubuntu dot com 2010-03-12 15:41 ---
Created an attachment (id=20095)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=20095&action=view)
differences for generated header files
these are the differences, when generated with gjavah 20100312; the na
--- Comment #16 from doko at ubuntu dot com 2010-03-16 13:42 ---
this change doesn't make any change to the libjava test results (configured
--with-mode=thumb).
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40860
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You rep
--- Comment #18 from doko at ubuntu dot com 2010-03-16 23:30 ---
rebuilding binutils 2.20.1 with the patch from comment #17 shows one
regression:
Running /home/doko/binutils/binutils-2.20.1/ld/testsuite/ld-arm/arm-elf.exp ...
FAIL: ld-arm/unwind-4
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla
--- Comment #20 from doko at ubuntu dot com 2010-03-17 10:51 ---
no change in the libjava testsuite when built with these binutils
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40860
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You reported the bug, or are watching the
--- Comment #2 from doko at ubuntu dot com 2006-08-17 22:40 ---
ecj.jar is from eclipse-3.2, copied the file to
http://people.ubuntu.com/~doko/ecj.jar
gcj-4.2 -v \
-O2 -g -Wl,-Bsymbolic -shared -fPIC -fjni -findirect-dispatch \
-o /tmp/ecj.jar.so /usr/share/java
--- Comment #3 from doko at ubuntu dot com 2006-08-18 11:38 ---
Created an attachment (id=12091)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12091&action=view)
example
more simple example from the gettext source, compiled with
gcj -C gnu/gettext/GetURL.java
gcj -
--
doko at ubuntu dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||debian-gcc at lists dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48159
Matthias Klose changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||debian-gcc at lists dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49690
Matthias Klose changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||debian-gcc at lists dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49049
Matthias Klose changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||debian-gcc at lists dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49049
--- Comment #5 from Matthias Klose 2011-07-21 08:31:56
UTC ---
Created attachment 24801
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24801
preprocessed volume.i source
--
Configure bugmail: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=e
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50350
Matthias Klose changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||debian-gcc at lists dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50350
--- Comment #3 from Matthias Klose 2011-10-12
19:16:01 UTC ---
I'll check, however I don't see the fix for 50326 applied to the 4.6 branch.
--
Configure bugmail: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50350
--- Comment #4 from Matthias Klose 2011-10-13
06:21:36 UTC ---
still seen on the 4.6 branch with 20111012
--
Configure bugmail: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50350
--- Comment #6 from Matthias Klose 2011-10-18
11:44:57 UTC ---
the proposed patch lets the build succeed
--
Configure bugmail: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on t
--
What|Removed |Added
CC||debian-gcc at lists dot
||debian dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bug
--
What|Removed |Added
CC||debian-gcc at lists dot
||debian dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bug
--
doko at ubuntu dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||debian-gcc at lists dot
--- Comment #1 from doko at ubuntu dot com 2006-12-09 10:20 ---
works with 4.0.3
--
doko at ubuntu dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work
--- Comment #3 from doko at ubuntu dot com 2006-12-09 11:39 ---
works in Debian unstable as well; Ubuntu specific.
--
doko at ubuntu dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
doko at ubuntu dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||debian-gcc at lists dot
--
doko at ubuntu dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||debian-gcc at lists dot
1 - 100 of 167 matches
Mail list logo
