[Bug target/26349] config/i386/i386.h: typo in comment?

2008-01-31 Thread bje at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- bje at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |bje at gcc dot gnu dot org |dot org

[Bug target/26349] config/i386/i386.h: typo in comment?

2008-01-31 Thread bje at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from bje at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-01 02:19 --- Thanks for the report. In the mainline i386.h (changed since 4.2), the cpu types are enumerated rather than a sequence of #defines. As a result, i486 really is "2", so the comment is now correc

[Bug preprocessor/11931] unjustified warning for C89 code using HUGE_VAL

2009-02-22 Thread bje at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- bje at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added CC|bje at gcc dot gnu dot org | http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11931 --- You are

[Bug c/16676] [3.4 Regression] ICE with nested functions and -g1, blocks glibc

2005-05-09 Thread bje at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From bje at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-10 01:24 --- Patch approved by rth and committed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW