t libstdc++, but only an .a file for linking into 64-bit
binaries, not 32-bit.
Not sure if we should provide both when built on 64-bit arch, or if we
should make separate packages for .a files (which I hate).
- Tom
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a s
Buyer beware - Penis patches!
http://www.xunepa.com/ss/
Desire makes everything blossom; possession makes everything wither and fade.
Just turn left at Greenland...
I don't believe in astrology; I'm a Sagitarian and we're skeptical.
The greatest griefs are those we cause ourselve
Package: g77-2.95
Version: 1:2.95.4-12
Severity: normal
I have a multi-language application. It used to compile fine. Now, it
has an undefined reference when linking.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/hello/runF77]>g77 -g -O2 -o runF772C
helloclient.o ./.libs/libClient.a -L/usr/lib/gcc-lib/i386-linux/2.95.4
.../
Package: g++-4.3
Version: 4.3.2-1.1
Severity: normal
As documented here:
http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-4.3.5/gcc/Structure_002dPacking-Pragmas.html#Structure_002dPacking-Pragmas
g++ supports using the #pragma pack syntax to forcibly pack a structure
which must be the minimum size. The a
Package: g77-3.4
Version: 3.4.6-4
Severity: normal
Setting up g77 (3.4.6-13) ...
/var/lib/dpkg/info/g77.postinst: line 12: /usr/share/man/man1/g77.1.gz: No such
file or directory
dpkg: error processing g77 (--configure):
subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1
Errors wer
Package: gfortran
Version: 4:4.1.1-9
Severity: normal
Setting up gfortran (4.1.1-9) ...
/var/lib/dpkg/info/gfortran.postinst: line 5:
/usr/share/man/man1/gfortran.1.gz: No such file or directory
dpkg: error processing gfortran (--configure):
subprocess post-installation script returned error exi
Package: g++-4.2
Version: 4.2-20070528-1
Severity: normal
I reported this upstream here:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32182
I may have found a situation where GCC's optimizations causes a constructor to
be skipped that leads to a crash. This problem first manifested itself in a
pro
Verlaag uw drinkwaterfactuur
Kies voor een SipWell waterkoeler
En bied uw klanten en werknemers water van bronkwaliteit
Ontdek alle voordelen
Waarom kiezen voor SipWell waterkoelers?
-Unieke designs voor elk interieur
-Geen zorgen om levering en facturatie
Package: gcj-4.8-jre-headless
Version: 4.8.2-2
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
# apt-get install -f
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
Correcting dependencies... Done
The following packages were automatically installed and are no longe
>>>>> "Matthias" == Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Matthias> This report is very vague. Should it be submitted to bugzilla anyway?
Could you get more info first?
Ideally the reporter could find out exactly what goes wrong.
Tom
Hi,
This bug is several years old and seems to have been fixed. Should
it be closed?
Thanks,
--
Tom Zych
This email address will expire at some point to thwart spammers.
Permanent address: echo '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' | rot13
Matthias Klose wrote:
> it's not fixed in any released gcc version.
Hmm, yes, I didn't read it carefully enough. Sorry.
--
Tom Zych
This email address will expire at some point to thwart spammers.
Permanent address: echo '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' | rot13
mains I'd like to
get a bugzilla entry for it.
Tom
>>>>> "Matthias" == Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Matthias> class Bug {
Matthias> static synchronized Object get(int i) { return null; }
Matthias> static synchronized Object get() { return get(1); }
Matthias> }
This fails for me (on x86) with -O1, but not with -O0.
Tom
Package: g77-2.95
Version: 1:2.95.4-0.010424
Severity: normal
I've got a mixed language program that has FORTRAN 77 and C. It runs cleanly
on other Unix-like operating systems, but when I ran it on Linux, I see the
follow message once when a F77 program is run:
/usr/lib/gcc-lib/i386-linux/2.95.4/
Hello. This bug can be closed, since the current gcc3.0.2 branch has a
slightly different fix checked in now.
--
Tom Rini (TR1265)
http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/
ich prints "foo" once
>> with javac, but twice with gcj/libgcj.
This bug also exists in the gcj CVS trunk. I've written a patch which
I am testing. I will check it in as soon as I'm satisfied with it.
The fix will appear in gcj 3.1.
Tom
Matthias Klose pointed this bug out to me.
I looked at it a little. The gij in gcc 3.1 (current cvs trunk) does
something that resembles what the JDK `java' does. (Output appended.)
Tom
creche. gij xcvae
Exception in thread "main" java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: xcvae
mplete short program that shows the exact problem?
That would be most convenient.
Thanks,
Tom
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: g++-3.3
Version: 1:3.3.3-6
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.5
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C
Versions of packages g++-3.3 depends on:
ii gcc
Package: g++-3.3
Version: 1:3.3.3-6
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.5
Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US
Versions of packages g++-3.3 depends on:
Previous patch forgot to disable -Wctor-dtor-privacy in the defaults. Here
is a new one. I should have tested better before submitting it. :-/
diff -Naur gcc-3.3-3.3.3ds6.orig/debian/README.Debian
gcc-3.3-3.3.3ds6/debian/README.Debian
--- gcc-3.3-3.3.3ds6.orig/debian/README.Debian 2004-04-29 2
ldd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?
> pkg=freecad&arch=mipsel&ver=0.18.3%2Bdfsg1-3&stamp=1568784049&raw=0
>
> https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?
> pkg=freecad&arch=s390x&ver=0.18.3%2Bdfsg1-3&stamp=1569764936&raw=0
>
I think it would be the easiest for me to reproduce on i386, so if you
could provide the reproduction information for that one, that would be
great.
Thanks,
- Tom
On 15-10-2019 14:33, Matthias Klose wrote:
> On 14.10.19 10:10, Tom de Vries wrote:
>> On 13-10-2019 21:34, Kurt Kremitzki wrote:
>>> Hi Matthias,
>>>
>>> On Saturday, October 12, 2019 12:34:30 PM CDT Matthias Klose wrote:
>>>> Control: ta
24 matches
Mail list logo
