Bug#169161: libstdc++5: Questionable type usage in mangled names

2002-11-14 Thread Stuart Anderson
Package: libstdc++5 Version: 1:3.2.1-0pre6 Severity: normal Tags: upstream Underlying types are used when creating the mangled name of symbols in C++. In libstdc++, many symbols contains the type mbstate_t. As encoded in the mangled name, the underlying type, __mbstate_t is used. When unmangled,

Bug#341882: binutils fix

2006-04-19 Thread Stuart Anderson
A fix for the binutils problem which is worked around in the patches submitted to these bugs can be found in #363423. Stuart Stuart R. Anderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] Network & Software Engineering http://www.netsweng.c

Bug#341882: gcc-4.0: [mips] support for tri-arch on mips & mipsel

2005-12-03 Thread Stuart Anderson
mips-biarch.dpatch === --- debian/patches/mips-biarch.dpatch (.../vendor/gcc-4.0/current) (revision 0) +++ debian/patches/mips-biarch.dpatch (.../src/gcc-4.0) (revision 145) @@ -0,0 +1,85 @@ +#! /bin/sh -e + +# DP: Patch author: Stuart Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Bug#341882: gcc-4.0: [mips] support for tri-arch on mips & mipsel

2005-12-03 Thread Stuart Anderson
On Sat, 3 Dec 2005, Matthias Klose wrote: why can't the biarch-include patch not be used? It probably can. This is likely the result of my attempts to keep my changes some what isolated early on. I'll have a look at reducing this to the existing biarch patch. as we don't have all required li

Bug#341882: gcc-4.0: [mips] support for tri-arch on mips & mipsel

2005-12-03 Thread Stuart Anderson
On Sun, 4 Dec 2005, Thiemo Seufer wrote: ar and ld get confused if they are not set. For some reason, it can't decide which binary format to use. It may be a binutils bug, but I was trying to not have to dig into that package and create a dependency on a specific patch level of yet another packa

Bug#341882: gcc-4.0: [mips] support for tri-arch on mips & mipsel

2005-12-04 Thread Stuart Anderson
On Sat, 3 Dec 2005, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: +! MULTILIB_DIRNAMES = n32 32 64 +! MULTILIB_DIRNAMES = 32 . 64 Why bother? Stuff in rules.d (binary-libstdcxx.mk) assume that $biarch means put it in a subdir name "64", and that $biarch32 means put it in a subdir named "32". : # remove

Bug#341882: Updated patch

2005-12-16 Thread Stuart Anderson
ch.dpatch === --- debian/patches/mips-biarch.dpatch (.../vendor/gcc-4.0/current) (revision 0) +++ debian/patches/mips-biarch.dpatch (.../src/gcc-4.0) (revision 150) @@ -0,0 +1,85 @@ +#! /bin/sh -e + +# DP: Patch author: Stuart Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> +# DP: Upstr

Bug#341882: Tri-arch support on mips(el) (was Bug#325226: libc6: Wrong dynamic linker on amd64)

2006-02-11 Thread Stuart Anderson
On Sat, 11 Feb 2006, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > Also, I am ready to give some help there. I am first trying to build the > gcc and glibc packages on a mips, but I face a chicken and egg problem > here. Does anybody already have glibc and/or gcc packages for mips? If > not, what is the easiest way to