Bug#148651: gcc 3.1-2 patch breaks binutils builds

On Sun, Jun 02, 2002 at 10:04:52AM +0200, Martin v. Loewis wrote: > Jack Howarth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > HJ Lu has requested that we regress out the g++-cxa-atexit.dpatch > > patch. > > The patch, in itself, is correct. Applications that want to conform to > the C++ ABI *must* use __

Bug#148651: gcc 3.1-2 patch breaks binutils builds

On Sun, Jun 02, 2002 at 11:45:46PM +0200, Martin v. Loewis wrote: > "H . J . Lu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > The patch, in itself, is correct. Applications that want to conform to > > > the C++ ABI *must* use __cxa_atexit. It is not the defaul

Re: libunwind in unstable

On Tue, Nov 23, 2004 at 04:31:46PM +1100, Ian Wienand wrote: > On Mon, Nov 22, 2004 at 05:30:38PM -0800, David Mosberger wrote: > > That would make sense. libstdc++5 calls _Unwind_Resume() which > > is/should be implemented by libunwind.so.7. With older versions of > > GCC, it was implemented as

Re: [hppa] binutils will not build shared libraries with external deps?

On Thu, May 29, 2003 at 04:37:06AM +0930, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Mon, May 26, 2003 at 10:22:51PM -0700, Randolph Chung wrote: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ gcc -shared -fPIC -o blah.so blah.c > > /tmp/ccC3fZeH.o(.text+0x1c): In function `call_foo': > > : undefined reference to `foo' > > This sho