Our university registrars office has been contacting people that we feel will
qualify for our EEPD (Employment Experience Program Degree). We have several
educational counselors standing by to assist you in obtaining this EEPD degree
which is solely based on your work experience and previous st
Package: gcc-11
Version: 11-20210306-1
Severity: normal
Tags: upstream
Dear Maintainer,
*** Reporter, please consider answering these questions, where appropriate ***
* What led up to the situation?
Attempting to build Linux kernel 5.12.0-rc2 with gcc-11
* What exactly did you do (or not
Package: gcc-8
Version: 8.2.0-3
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
*** Reporter, please consider answering these questions, where appropriate ***
* What led up to the situation?
Building a kernel using
CONCURRENCY_LEVEL=2 \
MAKEFLAGS="HOSTCC=gcc-8 CC=gcc-8 LD=ld.gold V=1 VERBOSE=1 KCFLAGS=-m
Hi, it appears that the symptoms were caused by running the build under a
kernel revision (between 4.18.0-rc8 and 4.18.0) that had issues.
Apologies for the trouble.
Please close the bug report.
On 14 August 2018 4:07:30 pm ACST, Bastian Blank wrote:
>Hi Arthur
>
>On Tue, Aug 14, 2
Package: libtsan2
Version: 12-2023-1
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
*** Reporter, please consider answering these questions, where appropriate ***
* What led up to the situation?
Performing actions...
Selecting previously unselected package cpp-12.
(Reading database ... 631827 file
forwarded 451707 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1679
thanks
Got the same issue with dmd, reported upstream.
Arthur.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
reassign 456596 gcc-defaults 1.61
thanks
Matthias,
Here is the diff against current SVN I already sent you.
Cheers,
Arthur.
From 3c86dc3d32b0570aa29e8b8e7dfd9bd69f186b02 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Arthur Loiret <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2007 23:40:33 +0100
Subject:
:55.0 +0100
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+gcc-defaults (1.61.1) unstable; urgency=medium
+
+ * Non-maintainer upload.
+ * Add gdc, make gdc-4.1 the default. Closes: #456596
+
+ -- Arthur Loiret <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Wed, 19 Dec 2007 10:17:51 +0100
+
gcc-defaults (1.61) unstable; urgency=medium
*
Gain a full 3+ inches on your Manhood, Safe and fast.
Your Wife or Girlfriend will Thank you
http://www.wrotethatit.com
Brain
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
reassign 473167 gdc-4.1
thanks
Yes, this is a ppc-specific issue, thanks for reporting.
Arthur.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Package: libffi
Version: 3.0.4-2
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
This patch adds biarchn32 support, and adds mips/mipsel to biarch64 and
biarchn32 archs. Also Updates gcc-multilib Build-Depends for mips/mipsel.
Thanks,
Arthur.
From acbaf5d46eebb9cf5c172294e783660301a4fc2b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00
Oups, forgot to add .install files. It just needs a symbol files update now.
From 54bde15a1efb9cde5933ffaeb1e2fb9b74f9fb2e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Arthur Loiret <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2008 01:19:13 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] Support MIPS triarch.
---
debian/c
severity normal
thanks
Install newlib-spu or add -nostdlib if you want to link without spu libc. I'll
add newlib-spu to gcc-4.3-spu's Recommends.
On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 02:32:36PM +0200, Adrian Knoth wrote:
> Package: gcc-4.3-spu
> Version: 4.3.0-3
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders pack
reopen 461101
reassign 461101 gcc-defaults
found 461101 1.69
retitle 461101 gdc should not be built on sparc
severity 461101 normal
merge 461101 475857 475863 475864 475865 475866 475867 475869
thanks
gdc is not broken on sparc, there is just no D runtime lib on sparc yet.
gdc-4.1 and gdc-4.2 wil
On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 12:30:28AM +0200, Gonéri Le Bouder wrote:
> > gdc is not broken on sparc, there is just no D runtime lib on sparc yet.
> gdc on sparc has a different behaviour and doesn't react as expect for
> most of the users. Having a build dependency on it is a problem. For the
> moment
On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 09:28:56AM +0200, Friedrich wrote:
> gcc-4.2 -m32 hello.c
> /usr/bin/ld: skipping incompatible
> /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/4.2.3/libgcc_s.so when searching for -lgcc_s
> /usr/bin/ld: skipping incompatible
> /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/4.2.3/libgcc_s.so when searchin
It works here in an up-to-date sid chroot:
% gcc-4.2 -m32 hello.c && file a.out
a.out: ELF 32-bit LSB executable, Intel 80386, version 1 (SYSV), for GNU/Linux
2.6.8, dynamically linked (uses shared libs), not stripped
Please give me the result of:
% dpkg -l gcc gcc-4.2 gcc-multilib gcc-4.2-mul
On Sat, Apr 19, 2008 at 03:55:49PM +0200, Ludovic Brenta wrote:
> Index: debian/changelog
> ===
> --- debian/changelog(révision 3018)
> +++ debian/changelog(copie de travail)
> @@ -1,3 +1,11 @@
> +gcc-defaults (1.71) unstable;
On Sat, Apr 19, 2008 at 04:49:35PM +0200, Arthur Loiret wrote:
> Why not libgnatvsn-dev and libgnatprj-dev as well?
>
Oups, didn't see that:
ifneq (,$(findstring gnat, $(no_packages)))
no_packages += libgnatvsn-dev libgnatprj-dev gnat-doc
endif
Sorry.
signature.asc
Descripti
On Sat, Apr 19, 2008 at 03:55:49PM +0200, Ludovic Brenta wrote:
> Index: debian/rules
> ===
> --- debian/rules(révision 3018)
> +++ debian/rules(copie de travail)
> @@ -256,6 +256,10 @@
> no_packages += gcc-spu g++
severity 472867 normal
thanks
On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 11:38:53PM +0100, Cyprien LAPLACE wrote:
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
Not that much.
> gcc-4.3 forgets some checks in -O2 and -O3, tested on x86_64 and arm
> (cross-compiler) targets.
Can you please report th
On Sat, May 03, 2008 at 12:05:32PM +0200, Cyprien LAPLACE wrote:
>> Can you please report this upstream ? See http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
>>
> I'll need to test it on bare and fresh gnu compiler, which I don't have
> right now. I'll compile one.
The gcc-4.3 from sid is up-to-date to the gcc-
On Thu, May 08, 2008 at 09:59:18PM +0400, Jan Trofimov wrote:
> Package: gcc
> Version: 4.3.0-4
>
> Im running Debian unstable on FS Pocket Loox 720. And gcc nor 4.3 nor 4.2
> version doesn't compile anything:
>
> kotoko720:~# uname -a
> Linux kotoko720 2.6.21-hh14-128M #44 PREEMPT Sat Sep 22 20
On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 12:10:28AM +0200, Alexis Huxley wrote:
> Fine, you are right, the package name might be wrong, but the bug exists.
> If I try to install 'gcc' (that should recreate the symlink, right?) then
> I get:
>
> The following extra packages will be installed:
> gcc-4.2
and
debian/libn32ffi-dev/usr/include/ which fails.
There is also a small typo (s/32n/n32/), this patch fixes the problems.
From 1468a32948c2a04d016b7f4cd0f9c9b9998a7fc9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Arthur Loiret <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, 17 May 2008 13:37:19 +
Subject: [PATCH] Fix
With this patch /usr/include/mips64-linux-gnu/ is installed in both
libn32ffi-dev and lib64ffi-dev, please wait for my next patch.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Hi Thiemo,
On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 04:13:20PM +0200, Arthur Loiret wrote:
> With this patch /usr/include/mips64-linux-gnu/ is installed in both
> libn32ffi-dev and lib64ffi-dev, please wait for my next patch.
Here is the diff between header from mips and mips64 builds (it is the same for
0332f0e06 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Arthur Loiret <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 21 May 2008 09:45:36 +
Subject: [PATCH] * Fix multiarch headers installation on mips{,el}:
- Install ABI O32 headers in /usr/include/mips{,el}-linux-gnu
- Install ABI 64 headers in /usr/include/mips
On Sat, May 24, 2008 at 03:53:25PM +0200, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
> Package: gcc-snapshot
> Version: 20080523-1
> Severity: serious
>
> Heya,
>
> Building the snapshot package failed on my buildd when preparing the
> sources:
>
This is because the sparc-biarch patch conflicts with the rec
On Mon, Jun 02, 2008 at 07:19:41PM +0100, Hector Oron wrote:
> Hello,
>
> This patch also fixes amd64->i486, plus it includes the above patch for
> powerpc.
>
> Cheers
Why do we need cross-compilers between biarched archs ? ``gcc -m32'' on amd64
and ``gcc -m64'' on i386 are fine. Also, please r
Package: gdc-4.1
Version: 0.25-20080616-4.1.2-23
$ gdc-4.1 --version
gdc-4.1 (GCC) 4.1.3 20080623 (prerelease gdc 0.25 20080419, using dmd 1.024)
(Debian 0.25-20080616-4.1.2-23)
This should be 20080616 with dmd 1.30.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
rom the gcc-4_3-branch ? This
is bug and regression fixes only, and it sounds better than adding separates
patches for fixes already applied to the branch. Do you get the same results
with an up-to-date svn-updates patch and others patches from the branch
removed ?
Arthur
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Sun, Aug 10, 2008 at 11:19:25PM +1200, Brendon Green wrote:
> Attempting to resend the info. in smaller chunks. I will try to send
> the sched.i.gz file as a series of attachments (hopefully this is
> supported by the bugs.debian.org mailer)
It does, please send it.
signature.asc
Descript
t way to have them fixed.
Thanks for this! I will try to report Debian bugs upstream from now.
> >I hope that Arthur Loiret can provide access to an alpha machine. Note
> >that Debian conigures gcc on alpha to include -mieee by default. for
> >testing you'll find other gc
> should look into pruning unneeded information from debian/copyright.
Please upload.
Thanks for your work,
Arthur.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
reopen 499746
found 499746 0.10~pre34-1
thanks
Still fails to build.
On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 08:57:22PM +0200, Roberto Bagnara wrote:
>
> A new PPL 0.10 snapshot that should fix this problem
> is available at
>
> ftp://ftp.cs.unipr.it/pub/ppl/snapshots/
>
signature.asc
Description: Digi
Hi,
I have the same behaviour.
Arthur Lutz
--
Arthur LUTZ
LOGILAB, Paris (France).
http://www.logilab.com http://www.logilab.fr http://www.logilab.org
Développement logiciel avancé - Intelligence Artificielle - Formations
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
inline "String::funcOne[^\\n]*inline
copy in int main"
=== g++ Summary ===
# of expected passes18643
# of unexpected failures1
# of expected failures 135
# of unsupported tests 151
/home/arthur/gcc-4.4/gcc-4.4-4.4-20081128/build/gcc/t
inline "String::funcOne[^\\n]*inline
copy in int main"
=== g++ Summary ===
# of expected passes18637
# of unexpected failures1
# of expected failures 135
# of unsupported tests 151
/home/arthur/gcc-4.4/gcc-4.4-4.4-20081121/build/gcc/t
retitle 504684 [Fixed in 4.4] gcc-4.3: __attribute__((const)) breaks
__attribute__((warn_unused_result))
thanks
The bug is fixed in GCC 4.4 from trunk.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
forwarded 504684 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR38560
thanks
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
notforwarded 504684
forwarded 502283 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR38560
thanks
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
tags 510616 + unreproductible
thanks
On Sat, Jan 03, 2009 at 08:32:20PM +0100, Hramrach wrote:
> Compiling the attached file takes ~10s with gcc 4.2 and ~ 6min with gcc
> 4.3
>
> Most people would think the compiler has lockued up already.
>
> gcc-4.3 -O2 -g -Wall -Wno-parentheses -o parse.o -c
objection about this?
[0] http://gcc.gnu.org/PR38969
Thanks,
Arthur.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Probably my fault, I'll have a look. Thanks for reporting.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Hi,
2009/4/11, Kurt Roeckx :
> I've attached a reduced test case that gives a simular error message:
Awesome! Thanks, I'll forward it upstream.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
2009/4/11, Kurt Roeckx :
>> Awesome! Thanks, I'll forward it upstream.
>
> I've already done that.
Then please send the forwarded command to the BTS.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
gcc doesn't look there. As such, the program "#include "
> doesn't compile. I'm an author for an upstream program that uses libffi, and
> I can't write a autoconf script to detect ffi.h if it's not in some sort of
> standard place.
GCC from Debian *doe
Right. This is a recent regression, from 4.3.3-7 upload. The multiarch
patch has been changed and seems to be off. I'll have a look, thanks
for reporting!
Arthur.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble?
Thanks for your report. I'm trying to have this fixed asap.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
The missing dir separator has been added, the fix is in our svn. Now a
few comments about your bug report:
2009/5/8, Goswin Brederlow :
> # Broken path. Missing a '/'?
Yes, fixed.
> * Duplicate entry after canonicalize
Not an issue.
> ! Path for the wrong target
Not an issue as long as the 32
Hi!
Thanks for your test case. Could you please try again with
gcc-4.5/libgomp1 from experimental?
Thanks!
Arthur.
2009/8/21, Ole Laursen :
> Hi!
>
> Forgot to attach a test case. It's really simple. Install
> python-vipscc and run the following (and also attached) Python s
tag 551188 + unreproducible
thanks
Hi!
I can't reproduce your bug. Does it still occur, and if yes, have you
tried on an other machine?
Thanks!
Arthur.
2009/10/16, Delian Krustev :
> Package: libgomp1
> Version: 4.4.1-4
> Severity: normal
>
> $ ulimit -a > pre
>
ve gcc-4.5 in Squeeze (improvements for our users), and
that it has been conscientiously tested (see above).
What else makes you feel it shouldn't be allowed? If you have more
questions, please just ask them.
Finally, thanks a lot for the time you spent on this issue. I hope
this mail doesn'
2010/8/20, Ludovic Brenta :
> Arthur Loiret writes:
>> Are you saying that we are developing an operating system which is not
>> suitable for active development, or that it shouldn't be made suitable
>> for active development?
>
> I think he meant that st
u haven't applied that patch (if it's still required)
> your argument is moot. But I agree the plugin infrastructure *is* a
> compelling reason.
dragonegg doesn't need to patch GCC anymore. Plus there is a "2.7" release.
Arthur.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to deb
Hi,
Here is a reduced testcase based on libssh2. I get the ICE with gcc-4.3 -O2
only.
typedef long unsigned int size_t;
typedef struct _LIBSSH2_SESSION LIBSSH2_SESSION;
typedef struct _LIBSSH2_CHANNEL LIBSSH2_CHANNEL;
typedef struct _LIBSSH2_SFTP LIBSSH2_SFTP;
typedef struct _LIBSSH2_SFTP_ATTRIB
Hi,
Thanks for your bug report. Can you provide a minimal testcase, ie the
simplest fie possible for which the bug is triggered?
Thanks!
Arthur.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
The mapping is missing in gcc/multiarch.h (see
debian/patches/gcc-multiarch.inc). What is the corresponding GNU
triplet to m4-nofpu (it seems to be sh4-linux-gnu for m4)?
Arthur.
2010/1/5, Nobuhiro Iwamatsu :
> reopen 546443
> thanks
>
> Hi,
>
> This bug is not yet revised.
paste the include paths and library
paths for both m4/m4-nofpu obtained from gcc -v?
Thanks,
Arthur.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Hi,
The real error is from gnatlib's s-taprop.adb:
/build/buildd-gcc-snapshot_20100310-1-kfreebsd-i386-c6zRmm/gcc-snapshot-20100310/build/./gcc/xgcc
-B/build/buildd-gcc-snapshot_20100310-1-kfreebsd-i386-c6zRmm/gcc-snapshot-20100310/build/./gcc/
-B/usr/lib/gcc-snapshot/i486-kfreebsd-gnu/bin/
-B/us
Package: gpc-2.1-4.1
Version: 4.1.1-1
Severity: normal
gpc-2.1-4.1 is the only version of GNU Pascal Compiler installed on this
system, but a symbolic link from gpc was *not* created when I installed
gpc-2.1-4.1.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
Package: gpc-2.1-4.1-doc
Version: 4.1.1-3
Severity: normal
When installing, I get the following error:
Setting up gpc-2.1-4.1-doc (4.1.1-3) ...
warning: file `/usr/share/info/gpc-2.1-4.1.info.gz' does not exist at
/usr/sbin/install-docs line 718,
line 15.
warning: file mask `/usr/share/info/g
Package: gcc-4.2
Version: 4.2-20070609
Hello,
The file libstdc++-v3/config/linker-map.gnu has moved in gcc-4.2 to
libstdc++-v3/config/abi/pre/gnu.ver, then I suggest to correct the path
in binary-libstdcxx-cross.mk.
A simple patch is joined, and I have successfully built gcc-4.2 for
several tar
Here is the error I got:
cp -p
/usr/src/gcc-4.2/gcc-4.2-4.2-20070609/src/libstdc++-v3/config/linker-map.gnu
\
debian/libstdc++6-4.2-pic-sparc-cross/usr/lib/gcc/sparc-linux-gnu/4.2.1/libstdc++_pic.map
cp: cannot stat
`/usr/src/gcc-4.2/gcc-4.2-4.2-20070609/src/libstdc++-v3/config/linker-map.gnu':
N
after.
It could be replaced by:
ssp_no_archs = alpha hppa ia64 m68k mips mipsel hurd-i386
ifdef DEB_CROSS
ssp_no_archs += arm armel
endif
A patch is joined to this mail.
Have a nice day,
Arthur.
--- rules.defs 2007-07-15 06:04:23.0 +
+++ ../debian/rules.defs 2007-07-15 06:14
Hello
I wonder, if arm doesn't support ssp at all, as doko said, why should
it be disabled only when cross compiling?
Is there a specific reason or something ?
Thank you for your time, have a nice day.
Arthur.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "u
severity 439573 important
thanks
> No buildd is able to build it. amd64 and i386 was not uploaded from a
> buildd, the others failed.
You'll find the full amd64 build log here [0], excelsior has been able
to build it, and amd64 package has been uploaded from it.
[0]
http://buildd.debian.org/fet
return 0;
}
(just test it links fine, there are some issues with fpclassify and
signbit in libphobos and libm, at least on sparc, even if they are not
called in sources here)
Have a nice day,
Arthur.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
tags 439836 + confirmed upstream
thanks
Thanks for your bug report, reported upstream here:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1783085&group_id=154306&atid=791252
Have a nice day,
Arthur.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
Arthur.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
endif
Try to build for example with:
% DEB_CROSS_INDEPENDENT=yes DEB_CROSS_NO_BIARCH GCC_TARGET=arm
fakeroot debian/rules binary
DEB_CROSS_INDEPENDENT is not required with gcc-4.2, it has been merged
with DEB_CROSS.
Arthur.
2007/9/20, Phil Endecott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Dear Expert
`'LS
Depends: BASEDEP, g++`'PV`'TS (= ${gcc:Version}), libstdc++CXX_SO`'LS
(>= ${gcc:Version}), ${dep:libcdev}
libstdc++-dev just depends on g++, you perhaps wanted to install
libstdc++ instead.
Arthur.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ur PC and
you'll get libstdc++ headers in /usr/arm-linux-gnu, your
cross-compiler should be able to find them.
Arthur.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Hi Arthur,
>
> I have used dpkg-cross extensively in the past. I am now trying this
> alternative approach, which seems to work well except for libstdc++.
> For a typical package X I can simply install X and X-dev on the ARM
> system and the cross-compiler will see the inclu
be adapted for the debian gdc package or
> as an option for a specific debian package for gdc?
I'm going to try this and see, thanks.
Arthur.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
tags 443744 + upstream confirmed
thanks
Reported upstream:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1800931&group_id=154306&atid=791252
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: gcc-5
Version: 5.2.1-24
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
*** Reporter, please consider answering these questions, where appropriate ***
* What led up to the situation?
Upgrading gcc-5 from 5.2.1-23 to 5.2.1-24 and associated libraries.
iceweasel locked up as in bug #804060, and
Package: gcc-5
Followup-For: Bug #805850
Dear Maintainer,
*** Reporter, please consider answering these questions, where appropriate ***
After upgrading chromium to version 47.0.2526.73-1 and iceweasel to
version 42.0-1 the problem no longer occurs.
Please feel free to close this bug.
*** End
Package: gcc-6
Version: 6-20151211-1
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
*** Reporter, please consider answering these questions, where appropriate ***
* What led up to the situation?
Attempting to build mplayer source from:
svn checkout svn://svn.mplayerhq.hu/mplayer/trunk mplayer
with ./co
Package: gcc-4.9
Version: 4.9-20140110-1
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
*** Please consider answering these questions, where appropriate ***
* What led up to the situation?
building current git head kernel with gcc-4.9
CONCURRENCY_LEVEL=6 MAKEFLAGS="CC=gcc-4.9 LD=ld.gold CFLAGS=-march=ath
Package: gcc-4.9
Version: 4.9.0-2
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
*** Reporter, please consider answering these questions, where appropriate ***
After installing gcc-4.9.0-2, the bug reported and fixed at:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60902
still hasn't been applied.
*** E
Package: gcc-6
Followup-For: Bug #808432
Dear Maintainer,
*** Reporter, please consider answering these questions, where appropriate ***
After upgrading gcc-6 to version 6-20160103-1, mplayer built without
problem.
Please close the bug report.
*** End of the template - remove these template li
Package: gcc-4.8
Version: 4.8.0-8
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
*** Please consider answering these questions, where appropriate ***
* What led up to the situation?
* What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or
ineffective)?
* What was the outcome of this action?
Package: gcc-4.8
Version: 4.8.0-8
Followup-For: Bug #710266
I tried building the kernel with:
MAKEFLAGS="CC=gcc-4.8 LD=ld.gold CFLAGS=-save-temps=obj" \
make-kpkg --config menuconfig --initrd linux-image
which finished with:
CC arch/x86/boot/compressed/misc.o
/tmp/ccP2VYLr.s: Assembler m
://realtimeremove.just1ce.com/deletion.asp
Best Regards,
Arthur Pittman
Account Manager
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Comment #10 from arthur dot loiret at gmail dot com 2009-01-07 21:04
---
Your patch fixes the build and brings no regression in testsuite.
--
arthur dot loiret at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
87 matches
Mail list logo
