Hello:
On 07/01/12 15:32, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
Hi:
On 07/01/12 07:37, Matthias Klose wrote:
On 01/07/2012 03:23 AM, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
Package: gdc-4.6
Version: 0.29.1-4.6.2-4
Severity: normal
Hello:
It appears that there is not gdc link to gdc-4.6, and no gdmd link to gdmd-4.6.
just in
Hi:
On 07/01/12 07:37, Matthias Klose wrote:
On 01/07/2012 03:23 AM, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
Package: gdc-4.6
Version: 0.29.1-4.6.2-4
Severity: normal
Hello:
It appears that there is not gdc link to gdc-4.6, and no gdmd link to gdmd-4.6.
just install the gdc package.
as gdc depends on gdc-4.
On Sat, Jan 07, 2012 at 07:53:25AM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> won't fix in the gcc-4.6 package; clearly these "skeletal" pages are
> not part of the upstream sources. please package those as a separate
> package if you intend to maintain these on a regular basis.
Lots of Debian packages includ
On 01/07/2012 05:36 PM, brian m. carlson wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 07, 2012 at 07:53:25AM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
>> won't fix in the gcc-4.6 package; clearly these "skeletal" pages are
>> not part of the upstream sources. please package those as a separate
>> package if you intend to maintain thes
> On 01/07/2012 05:36 PM, brian m. carlson wrote:
> > On Sat, Jan 07, 2012 at 07:53:25AM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> >> won't fix in the gcc-4.6 package; clearly these "skeletal" pages are
> >> not part of the upstream sources. please package those as a separate
> >> package if you intend to mai
On Sat, Jan 07, 2012 at 07:28:37PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> we have the original man pages in non-free (at least we had these packaged for
> earlier versions [1]; feel free to package these, I assume Nikita would
> welcome
> the help). These are far better than anything written from scratch
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "brian m. carlson"
* Package name: missing-manpages
Version : 1
Upstream Author : brian m. carlson
* URL : https://github.com/bk2204/missing-manpages
* License : GPL-2/Apache-2.0/CC-BY-SA-3.0 tri-license
Programming La
Package: gcc-4.7
Version: 4.7-20111231-1
Severity: serious
Hi,
I've been made aware that the GCC GFDL docs have been reintroduced into main
in experimental. This shouldn't have made it through NEW. Could you
please upload a new pruned tarball without the -doc packages and without
the docs in th
gcc-4.7_4.7-20120107-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
gcc-4.7_4.7-20120107-1.dsc
gcc-4.7_4.7-20120107.orig.tar.gz
gcc-4.7_4.7-20120107-1.diff.gz
gcc-4.7-source_4.7-20120107-1_all.deb
cpp-4.7-doc_4.7-20120107-1_all.deb
libstdc++6-4.7-doc_4.7
Accepted:
cpp-4.7-doc_4.7-20120107-1_all.deb
to main/g/gcc-4.7/cpp-4.7-doc_4.7-20120107-1_all.deb
cpp-4.7_4.7-20120107-1_amd64.deb
to main/g/gcc-4.7/cpp-4.7_4.7-20120107-1_amd64.deb
fixincludes_4.7-20120107-1_amd64.deb
to main/g/gcc-4.7/fixincludes_4.7-20120107-1_amd64.deb
g++-4.7
Hello:
On 07/01/12 07:37, Matthias Klose wrote:
On 01/07/2012 03:23 AM, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
Package: gdc-4.6
Version: 0.29.1-4.6.2-4
Severity: normal
Hello:
It appears that there is not gdc link to gdc-4.6, and no gdmd link to gdmd-4.6.
just install the gdc package.
Second, rdmd, which i
tags 655019 + pending
thanks
On 01/07/2012 10:48 PM, Mark Hymers wrote:
> Package: gcc-4.7
> Version: 4.7-20111231-1
> Severity: serious
>
> Hi,
>
> I've been made aware that the GCC GFDL docs have been reintroduced into main
> in experimental. This shouldn't have made it through NEW. Could yo
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 655019 + pending
Bug #655019 [gcc-4.7] GFDL docs in main
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
655019: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=655019
Debian Bug Tracki
13 matches
Mail list logo
