Package: java-gcj-compat
Version: 1.0.78-1
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 10.7.3
*** Please type your report below this line ***
After upgrading my system, a java program failed to run because the java
alternative was overwritten from the previously selected sun java.
-- System Informat
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 479950 + moreinfo
Bug#479950: java-gcj: java alternative overwritten
There were no tags set.
Tags added: moreinfo
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator
tag 479950 + moreinfo
thanks
Blars Blarson writes:
> Package: java-gcj-compat
> Version: 1.0.78-1
> Severity: serious
> Justification: Policy 10.7.3
>
> *** Please type your report below this line ***
>
> After upgrading my system, a java program failed to run because the java
> alternative was
#
# bts-link upstream status pull for source package gcc-4.0
# see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
#
user [EMAIL PROTECTED]
# remote status report for #107123
# * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR3507
# * remote status changed: (?) -> ASSIGNED
usertags 107123 + status-AS
#
# bts-link upstream status pull for source package gcc-4.1
# see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
#
user [EMAIL PROTECTED]
# remote status report for #356316
# * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR7302
# * remote status changed: (?) -> ASSIGNED
usertags 356316 + status-AS
gcj-4.2_4.2.3-4_m68k.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
gcj-4.2-base_4.2.3-4_m68k.deb
gij-4.2_4.2.3-4_m68k.deb
libgcj8-1_4.2.3-4_m68k.deb
libgcj8-1-awt_4.2.3-4_m68k.deb
gappletviewer-4.2_4.2.3-4_m68k.deb
libgcj8-dev_4.2.3-4_m68k.deb
libgcj8-dbg_4.2.3-4_m6
Accepted:
gappletviewer-4.2_4.2.3-4_m68k.deb
to pool/main/g/gcj-4.2/gappletviewer-4.2_4.2.3-4_m68k.deb
gcj-4.2-base_4.2.3-4_m68k.deb
to pool/main/g/gcj-4.2/gcj-4.2-base_4.2.3-4_m68k.deb
gcj-4.2_4.2.3-4_m68k.deb
to pool/main/g/gcj-4.2/gcj-4.2_4.2.3-4_m68k.deb
gij-4.2_4.2.3-4_m68k.deb
to poo
On Wed, May 07, 2008 at 12:04:44PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > After upgrading my system, a java program failed to run because the java
> > alternative was overwritten from the previously selected sun java.
>
> maybe this works for the simple case, but how is it technically
> possible to keep
On Wed, May 07, 2008 at 12:04:44PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> maybe this works for the simple case, but how is it technically
> possible to keep an alternative in manual state, if you change
> priority, add or remove slave links?
Neither of these actions cause the manual status to change since
9 matches
Mail list logo