Bug#439836:

tags 439836 + confirmed upstream thanks Thanks for your bug report, reported upstream here: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1783085&group_id=154306&atid=791252 Have a nice day, Arthur. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". T

Processed: your mail

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 439836 + confirmed upstream Bug#439836: gdc-4.1: generates invalid assembler code There were no tags set. Tags added: confirmed, upstream > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system adm

Bug#431984: [hppa] ICE: verify_ssa failed (expected an SSA_NAME object in statement)

On Mon, Aug 27, 2007 at 11:53:30AM +0200, Martin Michlmayr wrote: > * Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-07-06 15:41]: > > Happened while trying to build a current linux-2.6 from Linus' tree: > > Can you still reproduce this bug? I cannot with gcc-snapshot > 20070720-1 (the latest on hp

Processing of gdc-4.1_0.24-4.1.2-15_multi.changes

gdc-4.1_0.24-4.1.2-15_multi.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: gdc-4.1_0.24-4.1.2-15.diff.gz gdc-4.1_0.24-4.1.2.orig.tar.gz gdc-4.1_0.24-4.1.2-15.dsc gdc-4.1_0.24-4.1.2-15_i386.deb gdc-4.1_0.24-4.1.2-15_powerpc.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemo

Processing of gpc-4.1_2.1-4.1.2-15_multi.changes

gpc-4.1_2.1-4.1.2-15_multi.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: gpc-4.1_2.1-4.1.2-15_i386.deb gpc-4.1-doc_2.1-4.1.2-15_all.deb gpc-4.1_2.1-4.1.2-15_powerpc.deb gpc-4.1_2.1-4.1.2-15.diff.gz gpc-4.1_2.1-4.1.2-15.dsc gpc-4.1_2.1-4.1.2.orig.tar.gz Greetings,

gdc-4.1_0.24-4.1.2-15_multi.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: gdc-4.1_0.24-4.1.2-15.diff.gz to pool/main/g/gdc-4.1/gdc-4.1_0.24-4.1.2-15.diff.gz gdc-4.1_0.24-4.1.2-15.dsc to pool/main/g/gdc-4.1/gdc-4.1_0.24-4.1.2-15.dsc gdc-4.1_0.24-4.1.2-15_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gdc-4.1/gdc-4.1_0.24-4.1.2-15_i386.deb gdc-4.1_0.24-4.1.2-15_powerpc.deb to

gpc-4.1_2.1-4.1.2-15_multi.changes is NEW

(new) gpc-4.1-doc_2.1-4.1.2-15_all.deb optional doc Documentation for the GNU Pascal compiler (gpc) Documentation for the GNU Pascal compiler in info format. . WARNING: the integration of gpc into gcc-4.x is still in an experimental stage. For production use, please use gpc or gpc-2.1-3.4. (new

Al-Manahel Newsletter List Unsubscription

The removal of the email address: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >From the mailing list: Al-Manahel Newsletter List is all set. Date of this removal: Tue Aug 28 08:11:36 2007 Please save this email message for future reference. --

Bug#431984: [hppa] ICE: verify_ssa failed (expected an SSA_NAME object in statement)

* Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-08-28 15:14]: > > Can you still reproduce this bug? I cannot with gcc-snapshot > > 20070720-1 (the latest on hppa). > I get another ICE now, but not this one. What ICE do you get now? Is it in the same file or a different one? -- Martin Michlmayr h

[Bug c++/32596] [4.3 Regression] ICE with inline template specialization in anonymous namespace

--- Comment #4 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-28 16:08 --- Subject: Bug 32596 Author: jakub Date: Tue Aug 28 16:08:02 2007 New Revision: 127863 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=127863 Log: PR c++/32596 PR c++/32400 * pt.c (check_e

[Bug c++/32596] [4.3 Regression] ICE with inline template specialization in anonymous namespace

--- Comment #5 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-28 16:10 --- Fixed. -- jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED

Bug#439670: marked as done (depends on non-existing version of ecj-gcj)

Your message dated Tue, 28 Aug 2007 18:53:40 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line close has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the

Processed: [bts-link] source package gcc-snapshot

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # > # bts-link upstream status pull for source package gcc-snapshot > # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html > # > user [EMAIL PROTECTED] Setting user to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (was [EMAIL PROTECTED]). > # remote status rep

[bts-link] source package gcc-snapshot

# # bts-link upstream status pull for source package gcc-snapshot # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html # user [EMAIL PROTECTED] # remote status report for #429268 # * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR32370 # * remote status changed: ASSIGNED -> RESOLVED # * remote reso

[Bug c++/33194] [4.3 Regression] ICE: canonical types differ for identical types void ()(const char*, ...) and void ()(const char*, ...)

-- dgregor at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |dgregor at gcc dot gnu dot |dot org

[Bug c++/33194] [4.3 Regression] ICE: canonical types differ for identical types void ()(const char*, ...) and void ()(const char*, ...)

--- Comment #1 from dgregor at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-28 21:12 --- Patch available here: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-08/msg02013.html -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33194 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for

Bug#431984: [hppa] ICE: verify_ssa failed (expected an SSA_NAME object in statement)

On Tue, Aug 28, 2007 at 04:31:38PM +0200, Martin Michlmayr wrote: > * Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-08-28 15:14]: > > > Can you still reproduce this bug? I cannot with gcc-snapshot > > > 20070720-1 (the latest on hppa). > > I get another ICE now, but not this one. > > What ICE do y

Processed: severity of 428509 is important ..., retitle 428509 to fails to compile vanilla glibc

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.7 > severity 428509 important Bug#428509: gcc-4.1 post 4.1.2-8 breaks glibc compilation Bug#429487: glibc_2.6-0exp3(hppa/experimental): FTBFS: undefined reference to `__librt_multiple_th