I still don't see this, but obviously I'm doing something wrong. Can
someone show me the command line used to produce this segfault with
the .i file?
--
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAI
Package: gcc
Version: 4.1
Severity: important
I get below message when i want to install gcc package
The following packages have unmet dependencies.
gcc-4.1: Depends: gcc-4.1-base (= 4.1.2-13) but 4.1.2-14 is to be installed
Depends: cpp-4.1 (= 4.1.2-13) but 4.1.2-14 is to be install
* Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-08-21 10:12]:
> > I still don't see this, but obviously I'm doing something wrong. Can
> > someone show me the command line used to produce this segfault with
> > the .i file?
> Err, they are both attached to the original bug report.
I said the command line
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 438504 critical
Bug#438504: gcc-4.1: [powerpc] ICE while compiling linux kernel :
drivers/scsi/aic7xxx/aic79xx_core.c
Severity set to `critical' from `normal'
> # this affects the official build of the powerpc kernel on the
> # autobuilders.
* Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-08-21 10:37]:
> This is what failed. the .i producing thingy did not die.
Well, I was explicitly asking for a way to reproduce it with the .i
file.
> You guys have a real problem, you want me to forget the past hurts, but
...
No, Sven, you have a real prob
Your message dated Tue, 21 Aug 2007 11:16:13 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#438976: gcc can not be installed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26
> severity 438504 normal
Bug#438504: gcc-4.1: [powerpc] ICE while compiling linux kernel :
drivers/scsi/aic7xxx/aic79xx_core.c
Severity set to `normal' from `critical'
>
End of messag
--- Comment #25 from cesarb at cesarb dot net 2007-08-21 10:54 ---
The testcase seems to be missing one case where it should warn:
class H
{
protected:
~H();
public:
virtual void deleteme() = 0;
};
H::~H()
{
}
void
H::deleteme()
{
delete this;
}
class I : publ
>
> We have tested it on a powerbook and a mpc8349e-mitx board, but it seems
> they don't believe in me or something, so what is really needed is an
> independent test and confirmation.
>
> Could you do :
>
> apt-get build-dep linux-2.6
> apt-get source linux-2.6
> cd linux-2.6-2.6.22
>
Package: gcc-snapshot
Version: 20070811-1
Followup-For: Bug #437854
I can reproduce this problem with attached file (part of source of
program that uses Qt4):
% g++ 1.ii
1.ii:14: internal compiler error: in expand_or_defer_fn, at cp/semantics.c:3225
Please submit a full bug report,
with preproces
severity 438504 important
tags 438504 - confirmed
merge 438504 424918
thanks
This is the same as #424918.
--
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 438504 important
Bug#438504: gcc-4.1: [powerpc] ICE while compiling linux kernel :
drivers/scsi/aic7xxx/aic79xx_core.c
Severity set to `important' from `normal'
> tags 438504 - confirmed
Bug#438504: gcc-4.1: [powerpc] ICE while compiling linu
* Falk Hueffner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-06-19 17:03]:
> I can confirm this on i386, but not amd64 or alpha. A shorter test
Falk, are you going to forward this upstream?
--
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". T
* Patrick Winnertz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-07-17 14:50]:
> I've tried today to compile the linux-source-2.6.18 with this compiler and it
> failed with this output:
>
> fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmrecovery.c: In function ?dlm_mig_lockres_worker?:
> fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmrecovery.c:1433: internal compiler error: S
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-05-28 12:57]:
> Package: gcc-4.1
> Version: 4.1.1-21
> Severity: important
>
> $ cat test.c
> int f() { foo; }
>
> $ gcc -c test.c
> test.c: In function â:
> test.c:1: error: â undeclared (first use in this function)
Do you still see this with curr
I can reproduce this with:
/home/tbm/src/linux-2.6-2.6.21/debian/build/build-powerpc-none-powerpc
(sid)971:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: ..build-powerpc-none-powerpc] gcc-4.1 -nostdinc
-isystem /usr/lib/gcc/powerpc-linux-gnu/4.1.3/include -D__KERNEL__ -Iinclude
-include include/linux/autoconf.h -Iarch/pow
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> #
> # bts-link upstream status pull for source package gcc-snapshot
> # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
> #
> user [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Setting user to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (was [EMAIL PROTECTED]).
> # remote status rep
#
# bts-link upstream status pull for source package gcc-snapshot
# see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
#
user [EMAIL PROTECTED]
# remote status report for #413815
# * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR30564
# * remote status changed: ASSIGNED -> RESOLVED
# * remote reso
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 429657 + upstream
Bug#429657: gcc-4.1: optimisation bug abs() in nested if
There were no tags set.
Tags added: upstream
> forwarded 429657 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR33142
Bug#429657: gcc-4.1: optimisation bug abs() in nested if
Noted your statement tha
tags 429657 + upstream
forwarded 429657 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR33142
thanks
Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> * Falk Hueffner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-06-19 17:03]:
>> I can confirm this on i386, but not amd64 or alpha. A shorter test
>
> Falk, are you going to forward this upstream?
Accepted:
gappletviewer-4.2_4.2.1-3_i386.deb
to pool/main/g/gcj-4.2/gappletviewer-4.2_4.2.1-3_i386.deb
gappletviewer-4.2_4.2.1-3_powerpc.deb
to pool/main/g/gcj-4.2/gappletviewer-4.2_4.2.1-3_powerpc.deb
gappletviewer-4.2_4.2.1-3_sparc.deb
to pool/main/g/gcj-4.2/gappletviewer-4.2_4.2.1-3_sparc
FYI: The status of the gcc-4.1 source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 4.1.2-13
Current version: 4.1.2-15
--
This email is automatically generated; [EMAIL PROTECTED] is responsible.
See http://people.debian.org/~henning/trille/ for more information.
FYI: The status of the gcc-4.2 source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 4.2-20070712-1
Current version: 4.2.1-4
--
This email is automatically generated; [EMAIL PROTECTED] is responsible.
See http://people.debian.org/~henning/trille/ for more informatio
23 matches
Mail list logo
