[Bug tree-optimization/28544] [4.2 regression] ICE in add_virtual_operand, at tree-ssa-operands.c:1309

2006-08-09 Thread dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #8 from dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-09 14:38 --- I can trivially fix this, but the code isn't going to do what you want when i'm done, since it is an aliasing violation :) The assert in question just happens to be good at catching them. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/

[Bug tree-optimization/28544] [4.2 regression] ICE in add_virtual_operand, at tree-ssa-operands.c:1309

2006-08-09 Thread dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot |dot org

Bug#382290: gcc-4.1: O2 optimization problem

2006-08-09 Thread Patrick Ruckstuhl
Package: gcc-4.1 Version: 4.1.1-10 Severity: normal The following C code works fine with -O0 or -O1 but does not work correct with -O2 #include void foo (int arg1) { int loc1; if (arg1 < 0) { loc1 = -arg1; printf ("%d\n", loc1 ==

Bug#382290: marked as done (gcc-4.1: O2 optimization problem)

2006-08-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 10 Aug 2006 07:09:57 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#382290: gcc-4.1: O2 optimization problem has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it i