Bug#94701: how are you today?

Hi, Hope I am not writing to wrong address. Ib am nice, pretty looking agirl. I am planning on visiting your town this month. Can we meet each other in person? Message me back at [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact

gcc-4.2_4.2-20060606-1_multi.changes REJECTED

As requested by doko === If you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if the override file requires editing, reply to this email. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [Patch] #18: gnat-4.1: do not conflict with gnat (<= 4.1)

Matthias Klose wrote at 2006-06-17T22:48:26+0200: > checked in the changelog entry, the patch was already committed. I checked the web interface to the Subversion repository at 2006-06-18T14:49:00+0200. It indicates that, as of the last revision (1295), neither the changelog entry nor the patch a

Bug#358924: same with gcc-snapshot

Same with gcc-snapshot. When I build it, I see: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/tbm/gcc-snapshot-20060613$ (date -R ; dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot -B ; date -R ) > ../log 2>&1 *** glibc detected *** double free or corruption (out): 0x0001202f4740 *** *** glibc detected *** double free or corruption

Processed: Re: libmudflapth doesn't report simple bounds violations, libmudflap does.

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > forwarded 358761 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR26864 Bug#358761: libmudflap0: libmudflapth doesn't report simple bounds violations, libmudflap does. Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to http://gcc.gnu.org/PR26864. > tags 358761 + upstream Bug#35

Bug#358924: logs

here are the interesting parts of the testsuite logs from gcc-snapshot. -- Martin Michlmayr http://www.cyrius.com/ PASS: libmudflap.cth/pass39-frag.c (-static -DSTATIC) (test for excess errors) Setting LD_LIBRARY_PATH to .:/home/tbm/gcc-snapshot-20060613/build/gcc:/home/tbm/gcc-snapshot-20060613/

Bug#358761: libmudflapth doesn't report simple bounds violations, libmudflap does.

forwarded 358761 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR26864 tags 358761 + upstream thanks * Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-05-06 11:18]: > Maybe http://gcc.gnu.org/PR26864 I'm pretty sure that's it. gcc-snapshot works with the example provided. -- Martin Michlmayr http://www.cyrius.com/ -- To UNSU

Processed: forwarded

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 358924 + upstream Bug#358924: [alpha] libmudflap testsuite killed There were no tags set. Tags added: upstream > forwarded 358924 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR28077 Bug#358924: [alpha] libmudflap testsuite killed Noted your statement that Bug has been for

[Bug c++/28016] [4.1 Regression] emitting template constant

-- fang at csl dot cornell dot edu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||fang at csl dot cornell dot |

[Bug rtl-optimization/28062] [4.1/4.2 regression] ICE in simplify_subreg, at simplify-rtx.c:4466

-- fang at csl dot cornell dot edu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||fang at csl dot cornell dot |

[Bug libmudflap/28077] [4.1/4.2 regression] pass39-frag.c produces mudflap violation on alpha

-- tbm at cyrius dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||debian-gcc at lists dot ||debian

[bts-link] source package gcc-4.1

# # bts-link upstream status pull for source package gcc-4.1 # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html # user [EMAIL PROTECTED] # remote status report for #358761 # * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR26864 # * remote status changed: (?) -> WAITING usertags 358761 + status-WA

Processed: [bts-link] source package gcc-4.1

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # > # bts-link upstream status pull for source package gcc-4.1 > # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html > # > user [EMAIL PROTECTED] Setting user to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (was [EMAIL PROTECTED]). > # remote status report f

Processed: [bts-link] source package gcc-snapshot

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # > # bts-link upstream status pull for source package gcc-snapshot > # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html > # > user [EMAIL PROTECTED] Setting user to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (was [EMAIL PROTECTED]). > # remote status rep

[bts-link] source package gcc-snapshot

# # bts-link upstream status pull for source package gcc-snapshot # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html # user [EMAIL PROTECTED] # remote status report for #361883 # * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR27116 # * remote status changed: ASSIGNED -> RESOLVED # * remote reso

[Bug c++/28016] [4.1 Regression] emitting template constant

-- lidaobing at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||lidaobing at gmail dot com http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2